Linking Judging Moral to Acting Moral: A Relational Motivations Approach to Judging and Practicing Covid-19 Behaviors

Abstract

Building on the Relational Motivation Theory, the present research argues that relational motivations (RM) underlie both the regulation and the moral judgment of socially (un)responsive Covid-19 behaviors (e.g., physical distancing) and links these two via moral identity. We hypothesize that different types of socially unresponsive behaviors are judged morally wrong through perceptions of RM violations and that a stronger concern for unity predicts the extent to which individuals self-report to perform socially responsive Covid-19 behaviors. Additionally, the role of moral identity as an individual-level moderator variable linking perceptions about RM violation to the practice of Covid-19 responsible behaviors is explored. The results support the predictions with data collected from participants living in Turkey and the USA. In both cultures, socially unresponsive Covid-19 behaviors of others were judged morally wrong through RMs, plus individuals’ general concern for unity predicted their self-reported socially responsive Covid-19 behaviors. Additionally, for the sample from Turkey, results revealed that the general concern for unity was positively associated with self-reported tendencies to perform Covid-19 socially responsive behaviors only among individuals with a low or moderate moral identity, but not when moral identity was high.

Keywords

Covid-19 relational motivations moral wrongness prosocial behavior unity culture

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

Brown

T. C.

Carvajal

(2004). Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1108–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264079

Anderson

R. M.

Heesterbeek

Klinkenberg

Hollingsworth

T. D.

(2020). “How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?” Lancet 395(10228), 931–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5

Aquino

Reed

(2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423

Bear

Rand

D. G.

(2016). Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(4), 936–941. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517780113

Blasi

(1983). Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review, 3(2), 178–210.

Blasi

(1993). The development of identity: Some implications for moral functioning. In Noam

G. G.

Wren

T. E.

Nunner-Winkler

Edelstein

(Eds.), The moral self (pp. 99–122). The MIT Press.

Boegershausen

Aquino

Reed

(2015) Moral identity. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6(1), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.017

Capraro

Barcelo

(2020). The effect of messaging and gender on intentions to wear a face covering to slow down COVID-19 transmission. PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/tg7vz/

Chen

Yang

Wang

Bärnighausen

(2020). COVID-19 control in China during mass population movements at New Year. Lancet, 395(10226), 764–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30421-9

10.

Christner

Sticker

R. M.

Söldner

Mammen

Paulus

(2020). Prevention for oneself or others? Psychological and social factors that explain social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320980793

11.

Cruwys

Stevens

Greenaway

K. H.

(2020). A social identity perspective on COVID‐19: Health risk is affected by shared group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 584–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12391

12.

Curry

O. S.

(2016). Morality as cooperation: A problem-centred approach. In Shackelford

T. K.

Hansen

R .D.

(Eds.). The evolution of morality (pp. 27–51). Springer International Publishing.

13.

Everett

J. A.

Colombatto

Chituc

Brady

W. J.

Crockett

(2020). The effectiveness of moral messages on public health behavioral intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic. PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/9yqs8/

14.

Falco

Zaccagni

(2020). Promoting social distancing in a pandemic: Beyond the good intentions. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/a2nys

15.

Festinger

(1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Row, Peterson.

16.

Fiske

A. P.

(1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99(4), 689–723. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.689

17.

Gates

(2020). Responding to Covid-19—A once-in-a-century pandemic? New England Journal of Medicine, 382(18), 1677–1679. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2003762.

18.

Gelfand

M. J.

Harrington

J. R.

Jackson

J. C.

(2017). The strength of social norms across human groups. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 800–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708631

19.

Gouin

(2020). Social, cognitive, and emotional predictors of adherence to physical distancing during the covid-19 pandemic. PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/ksj52/

20.

Graham

Haidt

Koleva

Motyl

Iyer

Wojcik

S. P

Ditto

P. H.

(2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press.

21.

Graham

Nosek

B. A.

Haidt

Iyer

Koleva

Ditto

P. H.

(2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847

22.

Haidt

Kesebir

(2010). Morality. In Fiske

S. T.

Gilbert

D. T.

Lindzey

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002022

23.

Harper

C. A.

Satchell

L. P.

Fido

Latzman

R. D.

(2020). Functional fear predicts public health compliance in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5

24.

Hayes

A. F.

(2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved from http://afhayes.com/introduction-to-mediation-moderation-and-conditional-process-analysis.html.

25.

Heffner

Vives

FeldmanHall

(2020). Emotional responses to prosocial messages increase willingness to self-isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic. PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/qkxvb/

26.

Hertz

S. G.

Krettenauer

(2016). Does moral identity effectively predict moral behavior? A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 20(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000062

27.

Holshue

M. L.

DeBolt

Lindquist

Lofy

K. H.

Wiesman

Bruce

Spitters

Ericson

Wilkerson

Tural

Diaz

Cohn

Fox

L. A.

Patel

Gerber

S. I.

Kim

Tong

Lindstrom

(2020). First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 382, 929–936. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001191

28.

Ahn

Wang

Chen

(2020). An early examination: Psychological, health, and economic correlates and determinants of social distancing amidst covid-19. PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/9ravu/

29.

John Hopkins University (2020). Coronavirus Resource Center. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html

30.

Jordan

Yoeli

Rand

(2020). Don’t get it or don’t spread it? Comparing self-interested versus prosocially framed COVID-19 prevention messaging. PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/yuq7x/

31.

Kachanoff

Bigman

Kapsaskis

Gray

(2020). Measuring two distinct psychological threats of COVID-19 and their unique impacts on wellbeing and adherence to public health behaviors. PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/5zr3w/

32.

Kuiper

M. E.

de Bruijn

A. L.

Reinders Folmer

Olthuis

Brownlee

Kooistra

E. B.

Fine

van Rooij

(2020). The intelligent lockdown: Compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures in The Netherlands. PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/5wdb3

33.

Larsen

Nyrup

Petersen

M. B.

(2020). Do survey estimates of the public’s compliance with COVID-19 regulations suffer from social desirability bias? Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.32.164

34.

Lunn

P. D.

Timmons

Barjaková

Belton

C. A.

Julienne

Lavin

(2020). Motivating social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic: An online experiment. PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/x4agb

35.

Oosterhoff

Palmer

C. A.

Wilson

Shook

(2020). Adolescents’ motivations to engage in social distancing during the covid-19 pandemic: associations with mental and social health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.004

36.

Pfattheicher

Nockur

Böhm

Sassenrath

Petersen

M. B.

(2020). The emotional path to action: Empathy promotes physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/y2cg5/

37.

Rai

T. S.

Fiske

A. P.

(2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021867

38.

Sailer

Stadler

Botes

Fischer

Greiff

(2020). Science knowledge and trust in medicine affect individuals’ behavior in pandemic crises. PsyArXiv. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tmu8f

39.

Tepe

Aydinli-Karakulak

(2019). Beyond harmfulness and impurity: Moral wrongness as a violation of relational motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(2), 310–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000169

40.

Walker

P. G. T

Whittaker

Watson

Baguelin

Ainslie

K. E. C.

Bhatia

Bhatt

Boonyasiri

Boyd

Cattarino

(2020). The global impact of COVID-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression. Imperial College London. https://doi.org/10.25561/77735.

41.

World Health Organization . (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public

42.

Yilmaz

A. G. F.

Yilmaz

A. G. F.

(2016). Ahlaki kimlik ölçeği Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.18026/cbusos.35372

43.

Zhou

Yang

X.-L.

Wang

X.-G.

Zhang

H. R.

Zhu

Huang

C. L.

Chen

H. D.

Chen

Luo

Guo

Jiang

R. D.

Liu

M. Q.

Chen

Shen

X. R.

Wang

Shi

Z. L.

(2020). A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature, 579(7798), 270–273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.22 MB