The present study aimed to observe the relationships between online trolling, exposure to antisocial online content, frequency of social media use, and gender, using the GAM as a theoretical framework. Four hundred twenty-nine Brazilian internet users (mean = 25.07 years; SD = 7.59; EP = 0.36), most of whom were women (71.8%), participated in the survey. Bivariate correlations indicated a positive relationship between online trolling, exposure to antisocial online content (r = 0.12; p < 0.01), Facebook use (r = 0.21; p < 0.01), Twitter Use (r = 0.12; p < 0.01), and gender (r = 0.15; p < 0.01). An explanatory model including these variables was tested, and obtained a significant model fit (GFI = 0.99; Comparative Fit-Index = 0.99; Tucker Lewis Index = 0.97; Root Mean Square Residual = 0.02; RMSEA = 0.02 | CI = 0 .01–0.07 |). Were also observed indirect effects for exposure to antisocial online content through Twitter use and Facebook use on trolling (λ = 0.03; CI = 0.01–0.05; p < 0.05). It is possible to conclude that the research objectives were fulfilled, emphasizing the role of situational variables in the understanding of online trolling.
AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2018). Media violence and the general aggression model. Journal of Social Issues, 74(2), 386–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12275
3.
ArriagaP.AguiarC. (2019). Gender differences in aggression: The role of displaying facial emotional cues in a competitive situation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60(5), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12568
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The essence of control. Freeman.
6.
BlankenshipK. L.AllenJ. J.KaneK. A.AndersonC. A. (2019). The role of attitudes in violence and aggression. In AlbarracinD.JohnsonB. T. (Eds.), Handbook of Attitudes (2nd Edition, Vol. 2, pp. 299–336)Routledge. Applications.
BuchananT. (2015). Aggressive priming online: Facebook adverts can prime aggressive cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior, 48(2), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.072
9.
BuckelsE. E.TrapnellP. D.AndjelovicT.PaulhusD. L. (2018). Internet trolling and everyday sadism: Parallel effects on pain perception and moral judgment. Journal of Personality, 87(2), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12393
10.
BuckelsE. E.TrapnellP. D.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016
BushmanB. J.AndersonC. A. (2002). Violent video games and hostile expectations: A test of the general aggression model. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1679–1686. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237649
13.
BushmanB. J.HuesmannL. R. (2006). Short-term and long-term effects of violent media on aggression in children and adults. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 160(4), 348–352. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.160.4.348
14.
ByrneB. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. Routledge.
CrakerN.MarchE. (2016). The dark side of Facebook: The Dark Tetrad, negative social potency, and trolling behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.043
17.
Del ReyR.LazurasL.CasasJ. A.BarkoukisV.Ortega-RuizR.TsorbatzoudisH. (2016). Does empathy predict (cyber) bullying perpetration, and how do age, gender and nationality affect this relationship?. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.021
18.
DeWallC. N.AndersonC. A. (2011). The general aggression model. In ShaverP. R.MikulincerM. (Eds.), Herzilya series on personality and social psychology. Human aggression and violence: Causes, manifestations, and consequences (pp. 15–33). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12346-001
19.
FerencziN.MarshallT. C.BejanyanK. (2017). Are sex differences in antisocial and prosocial Facebook use explained by narcissism and relational self-construal?. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.033
20.
FichmanP.SanfilippoM. R. (2016). Online trolling and its perpetrators: Under the cyberbridge. Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
FrissenT. (2020). Internet, the great radicalizer? Exploring relationships between seeking for online extremist materials and cognitive radicalization in young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106549
22.
FujiK.EndoH. (2016). The short and long term effect of blocking-coping in cybervictimization. Journal of Media, Information and Communication, 1(24), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16244893
23.
HardakerC. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(2), 215–242. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2010.011
24.
HongF.-Y.ChengK.-T. (2018). Correlation between university students' online trolling behavior and online trolling victimization forms, current conditions, and personality traits. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.016
25.
HowardK.ZolnierekK. H.CritzK.DaileyS.CeballosN. (2019). An examination of psychosocial factors associated with malicious online trolling behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.020
26.
HuL. t.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
27.
HuesmannL. R.GuerraN. G. (1997). Children's normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 408–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.408
28.
KircaburunK.JonasonP. K.GriffithsM. D. (2018). The Dark Tetrad traits and problematic social media use: The mediating role of cyberbullying and cyberstalking. Personality and Individual Differences, 135, 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.034
29.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.
30.
KokkinosC. M.AntoniadouN. (2019). Cyber-bullying and Cyber-victimization among Undergraduate Student Teachers through the Lens of the General Aggression Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.007
31.
KurokawaM. (2010). Relationship between victimization and psychological stress, peer relationships, and enjoyment of school life: Traditional and cyber bulling. Japanese Journal of Counselling Science, 43(3), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.11544/cou.43.3_171
32.
LinJ.-H. (2013). Do video games exert stronger effects on aggression than film? The role of media interactivity and identification on the association of violent content and aggressive outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.001
33.
MarchE. (2019). Psychopathy, sadism, empathy, and the motivation to cause harm: New evidence confirms malevolent nature of the Internet Troll. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.001
34.
MarôcoJ. (2010). Análise de equações estruturais. Report Number.
35.
MarwickA.EllisonN. B. (2012). “There Isn't Wifi in Heaven!” Negotiating Visibility on Facebook Memorial Pages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705197
36.
McVittieC.SambarajuR.BainF. (2021). ‘I love James Blunt as much as I love herpes’ - ‘I love that you're not ashamed to admit you have both’: Attempted insults and responses on Twitter. Language & Communication, 76, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.10.001
37.
MedeirosB. G. d.PimentelC. E.SarmetM. M.MarianoT. E. (2020). “Brutal Kill!” Violent video games as a predictor of aggression. Psico-USF, 25(2), 261–271. Epub August 14, 2020https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712020250205
Navarro-CarrilloG.Torres-MarínJ.Carretero-DiosH. (2021). Do trolls just want to have fun? Assessing the role of humor-related traits in online trolling behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106551
PhillipsW. (2011). LOLing at tragedy: Facebook trolls, memorial pages and resistance to grief online. First Monday, 16(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i12.3168
42.
PowersRACochranJKMaskalyJSellersCS (2017). Social learning theory, gender, and intimate partner violent victimization: A structural equations approach. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(17–18), 3554–3580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517710486
SantosI.PimentelC.MarianoT. (2021). Conteúdo Antissocial Online: Uma análise Psicossocial e Dados de uma Amostra Brasileira Roger Goulart Mello; Patrícia Gonçalves de Freitas. (Org.). In Caminhos da comunicação digital: conhecimento e informação (pp. 93–102). e-publicar.
45.
SavageM. W.TokunagaR. S. (2017). Moving toward a theory: Testing an integrated model of cyberbullying perpetration, aggression, social skills, and Internet self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.016
46.
SestN.MarchE. (2017). Constructing the cyber-troll: Psychopathy, sadism, and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.038
TayadeP.ShaikhS.DeshmukhS. (2017). To discover trolling patterns in social media: Troll filter. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 2(5), 698–703. http://ijsrcseit.com/paper/CSEIT1725158.pdf
50.
ThackerS.GriffithsM. D. (2012). An exploratory study of trolling in online video gaming. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 2(4), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcbpl.2012100102
