Online Trolling: The Impact of Antisocial Online Content,Social Media Use,and Gender

Abstract

The present study aimed to observe the relationships between online trolling, exposure to antisocial online content, frequency of social media use, and gender, using the GAM as a theoretical framework. Four hundred twenty-nine Brazilian internet users (mean = 25.07 years; SD = 7.59; EP = 0.36), most of whom were women (71.8%), participated in the survey. Bivariate correlations indicated a positive relationship between online trolling, exposure to antisocial online content (r = 0.12; p < 0.01), Facebook use (r = 0.21; p < 0.01), Twitter Use (r = 0.12; p < 0.01), and gender (r = 0.15; p < 0.01). An explanatory model including these variables was tested, and obtained a significant model fit (GFI = 0.99; Comparative Fit-Index = 0.99; Tucker Lewis Index = 0.97; Root Mean Square Residual = 0.02; RMSEA = 0.02 | CI = 0 .01–0.07 |). Were also observed indirect effects for exposure to antisocial online content through Twitter use and Facebook use on trolling (λ = 0.03; CI = 0.01–0.05; p < 0.05). It is possible to conclude that the research objectives were fulfilled, emphasizing the role of situational variables in the understanding of online trolling.

Keywords

online trolling social media violent media gender

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

C. A.

Bushman

B. J.

(2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231

Anderson

C. A.

Bushman

B. J.

(2018). Media violence and the general aggression model. Journal of Social Issues, 74(2), 386–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12275

Arriaga

Aguiar

(2019). Gender differences in aggression: The role of displaying facial emotional cues in a competitive situation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60(5), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12568

Bandura

(1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The essence of control. Freeman.

Blankenship

K. L.

Allen

J. J.

Kane

K. A.

Anderson

C. A.

(2019). The role of attitudes in violence and aggression. In Albarracin

Johnson

B. T.

(Eds.), Handbook of Attitudes (2nd Edition, Vol. 2, pp. 299–336)Routledge. Applications.

Brewer

Kerslake

(2015). Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.073.

Buchanan

(2015). Aggressive priming online: Facebook adverts can prime aggressive cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior, 48(2), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.072

Buckels

E. E.

Trapnell

P. D.

Andjelovic

Paulhus

D. L.

(2018). Internet trolling and everyday sadism: Parallel effects on pain perception and moral judgment. Journal of Personality, 87(2), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12393

10.

Buckels

E. E.

Trapnell

P. D.

Paulhus

D. L.

(2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016

11.

Burrell

(2015). Twitter is winning war on trolls and extremists, says its europe chief. http://www.independent.co.uk/lifestyle/gadgets-and-tech/news/twitter-is-winning-war-on-trolls-and-extremists-says-its-europe-chief-a6786246.html

12.

Bushman

B. J.

Anderson

C. A.

(2002). Violent video games and hostile expectations: A test of the general aggression model. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1679–1686. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237649

13.

Bushman

B. J.

Huesmann

L. R.

(2006). Short-term and long-term effects of violent media on aggression in children and adults. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 160(4), 348–352. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.160.4.348

14.

Byrne

B. M.

(2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. Routledge.

15.

Chevalier

(2020). Latin America: Most targeted countries by cyber attacks 2020 https://www.statista.com/statistics/818412/latin-american-countries-highest-share-cyber-attacks/

16.

Craker

March

(2016). The dark side of Facebook: The Dark Tetrad, negative social potency, and trolling behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.043

17.

Del Rey

Lazuras

Casas

J. A.

Barkoukis

Ortega-Ruiz

Tsorbatzoudis

(2016). Does empathy predict (cyber) bullying perpetration, and how do age, gender and nationality affect this relationship?. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.021

18.

DeWall

C. N.

Anderson

C. A.

(2011). The general aggression model. In Shaver

P. R.

Mikulincer

(Eds.), Herzilya series on personality and social psychology. Human aggression and violence: Causes, manifestations, and consequences (pp. 15–33). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12346-001

19.

Ferenczi

Marshall

T. C.

Bejanyan

(2017). Are sex differences in antisocial and prosocial Facebook use explained by narcissism and relational self-construal?. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.033

20.

Fichman

Sanfilippo

M. R.

(2016). Online trolling and its perpetrators: Under the cyberbridge. Rowman & Littlefield.

21.

Frissen

(2020). Internet, the great radicalizer? Exploring relationships between seeking for online extremist materials and cognitive radicalization in young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106549

22.

Fuji

Endo

(2016). The short and long term effect of blocking-coping in cybervictimization. Journal of Media, Information and Communication, 1(24), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16244893

23.

Hardaker

(2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(2), 215–242. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2010.011

24.

Hong

F.-Y.

Cheng

K.-T.

(2018). Correlation between university students' online trolling behavior and online trolling victimization forms, current conditions, and personality traits. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.016

25.

Howard

Zolnierek

K. H.

Critz

Dailey

Ceballos

(2019). An examination of psychosocial factors associated with malicious online trolling behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.020

26.

L. t.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

27.

Huesmann

L. R.

Guerra

N. G.

(1997). Children's normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 408–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.408

28.

Kircaburun

Jonason

P. K.

Griffiths

M. D.

(2018). The Dark Tetrad traits and problematic social media use: The mediating role of cyberbullying and cyberstalking. Personality and Individual Differences, 135, 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.034

29.

Kline

R. B.

(2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.

30.

Kokkinos

C. M.

Antoniadou

(2019). Cyber-bullying and Cyber-victimization among Undergraduate Student Teachers through the Lens of the General Aggression Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.007

31.

Kurokawa

(2010). Relationship between victimization and psychological stress, peer relationships, and enjoyment of school life: Traditional and cyber bulling. Japanese Journal of Counselling Science, 43(3), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.11544/cou.43.3_171

32.

Lin

J.-H.

(2013). Do video games exert stronger effects on aggression than film? The role of media interactivity and identification on the association of violent content and aggressive outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.001

33.

March

(2019). Psychopathy, sadism, empathy, and the motivation to cause harm: New evidence confirms malevolent nature of the Internet Troll. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.001

34.

Marôco

(2010). Análise de equações estruturais. Report Number.

35.

Marwick

Ellison

N. B.

(2012). “There Isn't Wifi in Heaven!” Negotiating Visibility on Facebook Memorial Pages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705197

36.

McVittie

Sambaraju

Bain

(2021). ‘I love James Blunt as much as I love herpes’ - ‘I love that you're not ashamed to admit you have both’: Attempted insults and responses on Twitter. Language & Communication, 76, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.10.001

37.

Medeiros

B. G. d.

Pimentel

C. E.

Sarmet

M. M.

Mariano

T. E.

(2020). “Brutal Kill!” Violent video games as a predictor of aggression. Psico-USF, 25(2), 261–271. Epub August 14, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712020250205

38.

Navarro

(2020). Most popular social media websites in Brazil in 1st half 2020, based on share of visits. https://www.statista.com/statistics/290220/market-share-of-the-most-popular-social-media-websites-in-brazil/#:∼:text=Brazil%3Asocialmediavisitshare2020&text=Throughoutthefirsthalfof,ofFacebookusersinBrazil

39.

Navarro-Carrillo

Torres-Marín

Carretero-Dios

(2021). Do trolls just want to have fun? Assessing the role of humor-related traits in online trolling behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106551

40.

Pew Research Centre (2014). Online harassment. http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/10/22/online-harassment/

41.

Phillips

(2011). LOLing at tragedy: Facebook trolls, memorial pages and resistance to grief online. First Monday, 16(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i12.3168

42.

Powers

Cochran

Maskaly

Sellers

(2017). Social learning theory, gender, and intimate partner violent victimization: A structural equations approach. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(17–18), 3554–3580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517710486

43.

Santana

A. D.

(2014). Virtuous or Vitriolic. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.813194

44.

Santos

Pimentel

Mariano

(2021). Conteúdo Antissocial Online: Uma análise Psicossocial e Dados de uma Amostra Brasileira Roger Goulart Mello; Patrícia Gonçalves de Freitas. (Org.). In Caminhos da comunicação digital: conhecimento e informação (pp. 93–102). e-publicar.

45.

Savage

M. W.

Tokunaga

R. S.

(2017). Moving toward a theory: Testing an integrated model of cyberbullying perpetration, aggression, social skills, and Internet self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.016

46.

Sest

March

(2017). Constructing the cyber-troll: Psychopathy, sadism, and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.038

47.

StatCounter (2020). Social media stats Brazil. https://gs.statcounter.com/social-media-stats/all/brazil

48.

Tankovska

(2021). Social network users in selected countries in 2020 and 2025. https://www.statista.com/statistics/278341/number-of-social-network-users-in-selected-countries/

49.

Tayade

Shaikh

Deshmukh

(2017). To discover trolling patterns in social media: Troll filter. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 2(5), 698–703. http://ijsrcseit.com/paper/CSEIT1725158.pdf

50.

Thacker

Griffiths

M. D.

(2012). An exploratory study of trolling in online video gaming. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 2(4), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcbpl.2012100102