Prosociality improves with interpersonal synchronization—the temporal coordination of movement across individuals. We tested whether the benefits of interpersonal synchronization extend to temporary circumstances of induced frustration, where negative changes in prosociality are expected as a result. Participants performed two joint tasks—synchronization versus non-synchronization. Each task was performed twice, with high versus low induced frustration. After each joint task, prosociality was measured both with explicit tests, in which participants were aware of the test goal, and implicit ones, where they were less aware. Frustration levels per task were also reported. Results showed that increase in frustration led to decrease in implicit prosociality after the non-synchronization task, but not after synchronization, suggesting that interpersonal synchronization attenuates the antisocial outcomes of frustration. In addition, our study highlights the advantages of implicit measures of prosociality, among which the test we created (Interpersonal Trust Test) may stand as a useful resource in future experimental research.
AckermanS. J.LewisK. C.TaylorA. E. (2014). The thematic apperception test: A performance-based assessment technique. In Personality assessment (pp. 383–412). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203119143-15
2.
AcockA. C. (2014). A gentle introduction to stata (4th ed.): Stata Press. 9781597181426.
3.
AhmedA.SalasO. (2013). Religious context and prosociality: An experimental study from valparaíso, Chile. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(3), 627–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12045
4.
AkninL. B.BroeschT.HamlinJ. K.Van de VondervoortJ. W. (2015). Prosocial behavior leads to happiness in a small-scale rural society. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), 788–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000082
5.
AmselA.RousselJ. (1952). Motivational properties of frustration: I. effect on a running response of the addition of frustration to the motivational complex. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43(5), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059393
6.
AndoJ.KawamotoT. (2021). Genetic and environmental structure of altruism characterized by recipients in relation to personality. Medicina, 57(6), 593. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57060593
7.
AnshelA.KipperD. A. (1988). The influence of group singing on trust and cooperation. Journal of Music Therapy, 25(3), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/25.3.145
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv:1406.5823 [stat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823
11.
BatsonC. D.PowellA. A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In Handbook of psychology (pp. 463–484). American Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0519
12.
BehrendsA.MüllerS.DziobekI. (2012). Moving in and out of synchrony: A concept for a new intervention fostering empathy through interactional movement and dance. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 39(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2012.02.003
13.
BereczkeiT.BirkasB.KerekesZ. (2010). The presence of others, prosocial traits, machiavellianism. Social Psychology, 41(4), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000032
14.
BernieriF. J.ReznickJ. S.RosenthalR. (1988). Synchrony, pseudosynchrony, and dissynchrony: Measuring the entrainment process in mother-infant interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.243
15.
BlairR. J. R. (2001). ADVANCES IN NEUROPSYCHIATRY: Neurocognitive models of aggression, the antisocial personality disorders, and psychopathy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 71(6), 727–731. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.71.6.727
CacioppoS.ZhouH.MonteleoneG.MajkaE. A.QuinnK. A.BallA. B.NormanG. J.SeminG. R.CacioppoJ. T. (2014). You are in sync with me: Neural correlates of interpersonal synchrony with a partner. Neuroscience, 277, 842–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.051
18.
CarloG.HausmannA.ChristiansenS.RandallB. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431602239132
19.
Christian CadenheadA.RichmanC. L. (1996). The effects of interpersonal trust and group status on prosocial and aggressive behaviors. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 24(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1996.24.2.169
20.
CirelliL. K.EinarsonK. M.TrainorL. J. (2014). Interpersonal synchrony increases prosocial behavior in infants. Developmental Science, 17(6), 1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12193
21.
EckelC. C.GrossmanP. J. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1996.0081
22.
EllisL.HoskinA. W.RatnasingamM. (2018). Handbook of social status correlates. Academic Press
23.
FairhurstM. T.JanataP.KellerP. E. (2013). Being and feeling in sync with an adaptive virtual partner: brain mechanisms underlying dynamic cooperativity. Cerebral Cortex, 23(11), 2592-2600. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs243
24.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
25.
FoubertKCollinsTDe BackerJ (2017). Impaired maintenance of interpersonal synchronization in musical improvisations of patients with borderline personality disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 537. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00537
GadermannA.GuhnM.ZumboB. D. (2014). Ordinal alpha. In MichalosA. C. (Ed), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 4513–4515). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2025
28.
GallucciA.RivaP.Romero LauroL. J.BushmanB. J. (2020). Stimulating the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) modulates frustration-induced aggression: A tDCS experiment. Brain Stimulation, 13(2), 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.015.
29.
GiacaloneR. A.GreenbergJ. (1997). Antisocial behavior in organizations. SAGE
30.
GieserL.SteinM. I. (1999). Evocative images: The thematic apperception test and the art of projection. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10334-000
31.
GreenP.MacLeodC. J. (2016). SIMR : An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
32.
HelliwellJ. F.AkninL. B.ShiplettH.HuangH.WangS. (2017). Social Capital and prosocial Behaviour as Sources of well-being (working paper N. 23761). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23761
33.
HershcovisM. S.TurnerN.BarlingJ.ArnoldK. A.DupréK. E.InnessM.LeBlancM. M.SivanathanN. (2007). Predicting workplace aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.228
34.
HoveM. J.RisenJ. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949
35.
HuY.HuY.LiX.PanY.ChengX. (2017). Brain-to-brain synchronization across two persons predicts mutual prosociality. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(12), 1835–1844. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx118
KellerP. E.NovembreG.HoveM. J. (2014). Rhythm in joint action: psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130394. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0394
38.
KeltnerD.KoganA.PiffP. K.SaturnS. R. (2014). The Sociocultural Appraisals, Values, and Emotions (SAVE) Framework of prosociality: core processes from Gene to meme. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 425–460. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115054
39.
KirschnerS.TomaselloM. (2010). Joint music making promotes prosocial behavior in 4-year-old children☆☆☆. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.04.004
40.
Knafo-NoamA.UzefovskyF.IsraelS.DavidovM.Zahn-WaxlerC. (2015). The prosocial personality and its facets: Genetic and environmental architecture of mother-reported behavior of 7-year-old twins. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00112
41.
KnafoA.IsraelS. (2010). Genetic and environmental influences on prosocial behavior. In Em Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 149-167). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12061-008
42.
KnafoA.PlominR. (2006). Parental discipline and affection and children’s prosocial behavior: genetic and environmental links. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.147
43.
KobanL.RamamoorthyA.KonvalinkaI. (2019). Why do we fall into sync with others? Interpersonal synchronization and the brain’s optimization principle. Social Neuroscience, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2017.1400463
44.
KokalI.EngelA.KirschnerS.KeysersC. (2011). Synchronized drumming enhances activity in the caudate and facilitates prosocial commitment - if the rhythm comes easily. PLOS ONE, 6(11), e27272. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027272
45.
LaunayJ.DeanR. T.BailesF. (2013). Synchronization can influence trust following virtual interaction. Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000173
46.
LefevorG. T.FowersB. J.AhnS.LangS. F.CohenL. M. (2017). To what degree do situational influences explain spontaneous helping behaviour? A meta-analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 28(1), 227–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2017.1367529
47.
LoureiroA.LimaM. L. (2009). Escala de atitudes altruístas: Estudo de validação e fiabilidade. Laboratório de Psicologia, 7, 73–83.
48.
LuriaG.CnaanR. A.BoehmA. (2015). National culture and prosocial behaviors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(5), 1041–1065. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014554456
49.
MarshK. L.RichardsonM. J.SchmidtR. C. (2009). Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 320–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01022.x
50.
MatsumotoY.YamagishiT.LiY.KiyonariT. (2016). Prosocial behavior increases with age across five economic games. PLOS ONE, 11(7), e0158671. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158671
51.
MillerN. E. (1941). I. The frustration-aggression hypothesis. Psychological Review, 48(4), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055861
52.
MurrayH. A. (1943). Thematic apperception test. Harvard University Press
53.
NakagawaS.SchielzethH. (2013). A general and simple method for obtainingR2from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
54.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (2015). Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach. Oxford University Press
55.
R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
56.
RandDGKraft-ToddGT (2014). Reflection does not undermine self-interested prosociality. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 300. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00300
RennungM.GöritzA. S. (2016). Prosocial consequences of interpersonal synchrony. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224(3), 168–189. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000252
59.
RoedererJ. G. (1984). The search for a survival value of music. Music Perception, 1(3), 350–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285265
60.
RotenbergK. J.FoxC.GreenS.RudermanL.SlaterK.StevensK.CarloG. (2005). Construction and validation of a children’s interpersonal trust belief scale. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X26192
61.
SaroglouV.PichonI.TrompetteL.VerschuerenM.DernelleR. (2005). Prosocial behavior and religion: New evidence based on projective measures and peer ratings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(3), 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00289.x
62.
SimõesFCalheirosMM (2016). The relations between prosocial behaviors and self-regulation: evidences from the validation of the ptm-r for portuguese early adolescents. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, E73. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2016.70
63.
SkoeE. E. A.CumberlandA.EisenbergN.HansenK.PerryJ. (2002). The influences of sex and gender-role identity on moral cognition and prosocial personality traits. Sex Roles, 46(9), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020224512888
64.
StarkweatherJ. (2014). Factor analysis with binary items: A quick review with examples. Benchmarks RSS matters. http://it.unt.edu/benchmarks
65.
StupacherJ.MaesP.-J.WitteM.WoodG. (2017). Music strengthens prosocial effects of interpersonal synchronization - if you move in time with the beat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.007
van den BosW.CroneE. A.MeuweseR.GüroğluB. (2018). Social network cohesion in school classes promotes prosocial behavior. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0194656. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194656
YongA. G.PearceS. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor Analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
