Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-6
Assessing Mobile Phone Attachment: Validation of the Mobile Attachment Questionnaire in Turkish University Students and Examination of Related Variables
The main aim of this study was to adapt the Mobile Attachment Questionnaire (MAQ) to Turkish culture. It was also aimed to investigate whether mobile phone attachment (MPA) exists in Turkish university students and whether it has the main characteristics of interpersonal attachment. This study also aimed to investigate the MPA’s relationship with nomophobia, smartphone addiction and materialism, and to examine the predictive power of them on MPA. The study group consisted of a total of 242 university students. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to determine the structural validity of the MAQ-TR. The goodness of fit indices met the model fit requirements for the four-factor 13-item MAQ-TR. Reliability analyses results provided high internal consistency coefficients. Correlation analyses results showed that individuals highly attached to their phones experienced more severe symptoms of nomophobia and smartphone addiction and materialists were more likely to accept their phones as attachment object. Regression analysis showed that nomophobia, smartphone addiction and materialism were significant predictors of MPA. Given that MPA is an understudied concept, this study provides a starting point for future researches on problematic and non-problematic phone use.
AinsworthM. D. (1985). Attachments across the life span. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 61(9), 792–812.
2.
ArpaciI. (2019). Culture and nomophobia: The role of vertical versus horizontal collectivism in predicting nomophobia. Information Development, 35(1), 96–106.
3.
AsanteR. K. B. (2019). Exploration of the forms of mobile phone attachment among traders in Ghana. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918764015
BaumgartnerH.HomburgC. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0
6.
BeardenW.NetemeyerR.MobleyM. (1999). Handbook of marketing scales: Multi item measures for marketing and consumer behavior research. SAGE.
7.
BelkR. (1984). Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: Reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 291–297.
8.
BelkR. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.
BillieuxJ.MaurageP.Lopez-FernandezO.KussD. J.GriffithsM. D. (2015). Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research. Current Addiction Reports, 2(2), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1429
11.
BillieuxJ.Van der LindenM.RochatL. (2008). The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(9), 1195–1210.
12.
BowlyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss volume I attachment. Basic Books.
13.
BrethertonI. (1985). Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1/2), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333824
14.
BrowneM.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK.LongJ. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). SAGE.
15.
BuyukcolpanH. (2019). Nomophobia, attachment styles, depression and perceived social support among university students. Hacettepe University.
16.
ByrneB. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
17.
CheeverN. A.RosenL. D.CarrierL. M.ChavezA. (2014). Out of sight is not out of mind: The impact of restricting wireless mobile device use on anxiety levels among low, moderate and high users. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.002
18.
CholizM. (2012). Mobile-phone addiction in adolescence: The test of mobile phone dependence (TMD). Progress in Health Sciences, 2, 33–44.
19.
ClaytonR.LeshnerG.AlmondA. (2015). The extended iSelf: The impact of iPhone separation on cognition, emotion, and physiology. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 119–135.
20.
DohooI. R.DucrotC.FourichonC.DonaldA.HurnikD. (1997). An overview of techniques for dealing with large numbers of independent variables in epidemiologic studies. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 29(3), 221–239.
21.
DurakH. (2019). Investigation of nomophobia and smartphone addiction predictors among adolescents in Turkey: Demographic variables and academic performance. The Social Science Journal, 56(4), 492–517.
22.
ErenS.EroğluF.HaciogluG. (2012). Compulsive buying tendencies through materialistic and hedonic values among college students in Turkey. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1370–1377.
23.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.
24.
FloresP. (2004). Addiction as an attachment disorder. The Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
25.
ForgaysD.HymanI.SchreiberJ. (2014). Texting everywhere for everything: Gender and age differences in cell phone etiquette and use. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 314–321. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.053
26.
FowlerJ.NoyesJ. (2015). From dialing to tapping: University students report on mobile phone use. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 4716–4723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.568
27.
FullwoodC.QuinnS.KayeL. K.ReddingC. (2017). My virtual friend: A qualitative analysis of the attitudes and experiences of smartphone users: Implications for smartphone attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 347–355.
28.
GentinaE.RoweF. (2020). Effects of materialism on problematic smartphone dependency among adolescents: The role of gender and gratifications. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102134.
29.
GeorgeD.MalleryM. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update. Allyn & Bacon.
30.
GogginG. (2006). Cell phone culture: Mobile technology in everyday life. Routledge.
31.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.
HanS.KimK.KimJ. (2017). Understanding nomophobia: Structural equation modeling and semantic network analysis of smartphone separation anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20(7), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0113
34.
HuL.BentlerP. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
35.
KarabatiS.CemalcilarZ. (2010). Values, materialism, and well-being: A study with turkish university students. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(4), 624–633.
KeeferL. A.LandauM. J.RothschildZ. K.SullivanD. (2012). Attachment to objects as compensation for close others’ perceived unreliability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 912–917.
KimE.ChoI.KimE. J. (2017). Structural equation model of smartphone addiction based on adult attachment theory: Mediating effects of loneliness and depression. Asian Nursing Research, 11(2), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2017.05.002
40.
KingA. L. S.ValençaA. M.SilvaA. C. O.BaczynskiT.CarvalhoM. R.NardiA. E. (2013). Nomophobia: Dependency on virtual environments or social phobia?Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 140–144.
41.
KingA. L. S.ValençaA. M.SilvaA. C.SancassianiF.MachadoS.NardiA. E. (2014). Nomophobia: Impact of cell phone use interfering with symptoms and emotions of individuals with panic disorder compared with a control group. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 10, 28–35.
42.
KleineS.BakerS. (2004). An integrative review of material possession attachment. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.025
43.
KlineR. (1998). Measurement models and confirmatory factor analysis. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
44.
KlineR. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
45.
KlineR. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
46.
KnudsenH. C.Vázquez-BarqueroJ. L.WelcherB.GaiteL.BeckerT.ChisholmD.RuggeriM.ScheneA. H.ThornicroftG. (2000). Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of outcome measurements for schizophrenia: EPSILON study 2. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177(S39), S8–S14. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.177.39.s8.
47.
KolsakerA.DrakatosN. (2009). Mobile advertising: The influence of emotional attachment to mobile devices on consumer receptiveness. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15(4), 267–280.
48.
KonokV.GiglerD.BereczkyB. M.MiklósiÁ. (2016). Humans’ attachment to their mobile phones and its relationship with interpersonal attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 537–547.
49.
KonokV.PoganyA.MiklosiA. (2017). Mobile attachment: Separation from the mobile induces physiological and behavioural stress and attentional bias to separation-related stimuli. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 228–239.
50.
KwonM.LeeJ.-Y.WonW.-Y.ParkJ.-W.MinJ.-A.HahnC.GuX.ChoiJ.-H.KimD.-J. (2013). Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PLoS One, 8(2), e56936–e56937.
51.
LeeH.AhnH.ChoiS.ChoiW. (2014). The SAMS: Smartphone addiction management system and verification. Journal of Medical Systems, 38(1), 1–10.
52.
LeeY.-K.ChangC.-T.LinY.ChengZ.-H. (2014). The dark side of smartphone usage: Psychological traits, compulsive behavior and technostress. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 373–383.
53.
LeppA.BarkleyJ.KarpinskiA. (2014). The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 343–350.
54.
LittmanA. J.WhiteE.SatiaJ. A.BowenD. J.KristalA. R. (2006). Reliability and validity of 2 single-item measures of psychosocial stress. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 17(4), 398–403.
55.
LongJ.WangP.LiuS. (2019). Materialism and adolescent problematic smartphone use: The mediating role of fear of missing out and the moderating role of narcissism. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00526-0
MannionK. (2018). The effect of smartphones on anxiety: An attachment issue or fear of missing out? Seton Hall University. https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations
59.
MartinC. R.NewellR. J. (2004). Factor structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in individuals with facial disfigurement. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 9(3), 327–336.
60.
MeyersL.GamstG.GuarinoA. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. SAGE.
61.
NieJ.WangP.LeiL. (2020). Why can't we be separated from our smartphones? The vital roles of smartphone activity in smartphone separation anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 109, 106351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106351
62.
NoyanC.DarcinA.NurmedovS.YilmazO.DilbazN. (2015). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the smartphone addiction scale-short version among university students. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 16, 73–81.
O’KeeffeG. S.Clarke-PearsonK. (2011). Clinical report—the impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800–804.
65.
OksmanV.RautiainenP. (2003). Perhaps it is a body part: How the mobile phone became an organic part of the everyday lives of Finnish children and teenagers. In KatzJ. (Ed.), Machines that become us: The social context of communication technology (pp. 293–308). Transaction Publishers.
66.
OnalN. (2019). Metaphoric perceptions of high school students about nomophobia. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5, 437–449.
67.
ParentN. (2014). Attachment to mobile phones: An examination of university students’ mobile phone use within an attachment theory framework. McGill University.
68.
ParkC.MacinnisD. (2006). What’s in and what’s out: Questions on the boundaries of the attitude construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 16–18. https://doi.org/10.1086/504122
69.
RaubenheimerJ. (2004). An item selection procedure to maximise scale reliability and validity. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 59–64.
70.
RichinsM. (1994). Special possessions and the expression of material values. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1086/209415
71.
RichinsM. (2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 209–219.
72.
RichinsM.DawsonS. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303–316.
73.
RobertsJ.PirogS. (2013). A preliminary investigation of materialism and impulsiveness as predictors of technological addictions among young adults. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(1), 56–62.
74.
Rodríguez-TorricoP.ProdanovaJ.San-MartínS.JimenezN. (2020). The ideal companion: The role of mobile phone attachment in travel purchase intention. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(13), 1659–1672.
75.
Schermelleh-EngelK.MoosbruggerH. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.
76.
SchimmentiA.PassanisiA.GervasiA. M.ManzellaS.FamàF. I. (2014). Insecure attachment attitudes in the onset of problematic internet use among late adolescents. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 45(5), 588–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-013- 0428-0
77.
ShrumL. J.WongN.ArifF.ChuganiS. K.GunzA.LowreyT. M.NairnA.PandelaereM.RossS. M.RuvioA.ScottK.SundieJ. (2013). Reconceptualizing materialism as identity goal pursuits: Functions, processes, and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1179–1185.
78.
ShwetakN.JulieA.GillianR. (2006). Farther than you may think: An empirical investigation of the proximity of users to their mobile phones. UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous computing (pp. 123–140). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
79.
SolomonM. (1983). The role of products as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1086/208971
80.
TabachnickB.FidellL. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
81.
TaberK. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
82.
TakaoM.TakahashiS.KitamuraM. (2009). Addictive personality and problematic mobile phone use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 12(5), 501–508.
83.
TrubL.BarbotB. (2016). The paradox of phone attachment: Development and validation of the young adult attachment to phone scale (YAPS). Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 663–672.
UzunO.YildirimV.UzunE. (2016). Habit of using social media and correlation of social media addiction, self esteem, perceived social support in adolescent with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 10, 142–147.
86.
VincentJ.HaddonL.HamillL. (2005). The influence of mobile phone users on the design of 3G products and services. Journal of the Communications Network, 4, 69–73.
87.
WalshS.WhiteK. M. (2007). Me, My mobile, and I: The role of self- and prototypical identity influences in the prediction of mobile phone behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(10), 2405–2434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00264.x
88.
WalshS. P.WhiteK. M.YoungR. M. (2010). Needing to connect: The effect of self and others on young people’s involvement with their mobile phones. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 194–203.
89.
WehmeyerK. (2007). Assessing users’ attachment to their mobile devices (pp. 16–24). Management of Mobile Business.
90.
WeiM.VogelD. L.KuT.-Y.ZakalikR. A. (2005). Adult attachment, affect regulation, negative mood, and interpersonal problems: The mediating roles of emotional reactivity and emotional cutoff. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.1.14
91.
WilliamsD.VaskeJ. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49, 830–840.
92.
WinnicottD. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena: A study of the first not-me possession. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34(2), 89–97.
93.
YildirimC. (2014). Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Developing and validating a questionnaire using mixed methods research. Iowa State University.
94.
YildirimC.CorreiaA. (2015). Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 130–137.
95.
YildirimC.SumuerE.AdnanM.YildirimS. (2016). A growing fear: Prevalence of nomophobia among Turkish college students. Information Development, 32(5), 1322–1331.
96.
YooB.DonthuN. (2001). Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an internet shopping site (SITEQUAL). Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11885-7_129
