Academic-related stressors are common for college students, such as future career decisions or pressures to succeed academically. Furthermore, the impact of health and finance issues may add to the burden. Perceived support from an academic community, peers, or family can provide a buffer to mitigate the effects of these stressors. Several studies have emphasized the importance of support by instructors in particular and found that students’ perceptions of instructor support can counteract academic stress and promote retention. The purpose of the present study was to validate a scale for instructor support, which consisted of four factors: autonomy, expectation, interpersonal relationships, and engagement. A confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good fit for the items within each factor. Results also indicated that students who planned to return to the university next semester were more likely to report higher levels of autonomy and expectation. The Scale of Perceived Instructor Support (SPIS) is a short, 24 item-inventory that can be used by faculty advisors as part of a formal advising practice or informally by class instructors.
AllenJ.RobbinsS. B.CasillasA.OhI. (2008). Third-year college retention and transfer: Effects of academic performance, motivation, and social connectedness. Research in Higher Education, 49(7), 647–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9098-3
2.
BarnettE. (2011). Validation experiences and persistence among community college students. The Review of Higher Education, 34(2), 193–230.
BergerJ. B.MilemJ. F. (1999). The role of student involvement and perceptions of integration in a causal model of student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40(6), 641–664. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018708813711
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
7.
ChaoR. C. (2012). Managing perceived stress among college students: The roles of social support and dysfunctional coping. Journal of College Counseling, 15(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2012.00002.x
8.
ChapmanD. W.PascarellaE. T. (1983). Predictors of academic and social integration of college students. Research in Higher Education, 19(3), 295–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00976509
9.
ChenJ. J. (2005). Relation of academic support from parents, teachers, and peers to Hong Kong adolescents’ academic achievement: The mediating role of academic engagement. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(2), 77–127. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.131.2.77-127
10.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
11.
ChickeringA. W.GamsonZ. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3–7.
12.
CutronaC. E.ColeV.ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.RussellD. W. (1994). Perceived parental social support and academic achievement: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2), 369–378. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.369
13.
DanielsenA. G.SamdalO.HetlandJ.WoldB. (2009). School-related social support and students’ perceived life satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.4.303-320
14.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
15.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 38). Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). University of Nebraska Press.
16.
DennisJ. M.PhinneyJ. S.ChuatecoL. I. (2005). The role of motivation, parental support, and peer support in the academic success of ethnic minority first-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 46(3), 223–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/csd.2005.0023
17.
ElkinsS. A.BraxtonJ. M.JamesG. W. (2000). Tinto’s separation stage and its influence on first-semester college student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 41(2), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007099306216
18.
FriedlanderL. J.ReidG. J.ShupakN.CribbieR. (2007). Social support, self-esteem, and stress as predictors of adjustment to university among first-year undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 48(3), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0024
19.
GarciaT.PintrichP. R. (1996). The effects of autonomy on motivation and performance in the college classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 477–486.
GraunkeS. S.WoosleyS. A. (2005). An exploration of the factors that affect the academic success of college sophomores. College Student Journal, 39(2), 367.
22.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
23.
JöreskogK. G.SörbomD. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24.
JorgensenT. D.PornprasertmanitS.SchoemannA. M.RosseelY. (2018). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.5–1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
25.
KomarrajuM.MusulkinS.BhattacharyaG. (2010). Role of student-faculty interactions in developing college students’ academic self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 51(3), 332–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0137
26.
KuhG. D.CruceT. M.ShoupR.KinzieJ.GonyeaR. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116
27.
LakensD. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
28.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
29.
MarksM. B.HaugJ. C.HuckabeeW. A. (2016). Understanding the factors that influence student satisfaction with the undergraduate business major. Journal of Education for Business, 91(5), 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2016.1188757
30.
MultonK. D.BrownS. D.LentR. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30
31.
NadelsonL. S.SemmelrothC.MartinezG.FeatherstoneM.FuhrimanC. A.SellA. (2013). Why did they come here? The influences and expectations of first-year students’ college experience. Higher Education Studies, 3(1), 50–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/hes.v3n1p50
32.
NagdaB. A.GregermanS. R.JonidesJ.von HippelW.LernerJ. S. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. The Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1998.0016
33.
NosheenA.RiazM. N.MalikN. I.YasminH.MalikS. (2017). Mental health outcomes of sense of coherence in individualistic and collectivistic culture: Moderating role of social support. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 32(2), 563–579.
34.
O‘DonnellS. L.ChangK. B.MillerS. (2013). Relations among autonomy, attribution style, and happiness in college students. College Student Journal, 47(1), 228–234.
35.
PascarellaE. T.TerenziniP. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. Jossey-Bass.
36.
PauleyP. M.HesseC. (2009). The effects of social support, depression, and stress on drinking behaviors in a college student sample. Communication Studies, 60(5), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970903260335
37.
PelletierL. G.FortierM. S.VallerandR. J.BriereN. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25(4), 279–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014805132406
38.
RobertsJ.StyronR. (2009). Student satisfaction and persistence: Factors vital to student. Research in Higher Education Journal, 6, 1–18.
39.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
SmithJ. S.WertliebE. C. (2005). Do first-year college students’ expectations align with their first-year experiences?NASPA Journal, 42(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.2202/1949-6605.1470
43.
SteigerJ. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
44.
SuldoS. M.ShafferE. J.RileyK. N. (2008). A social-cognitive-behavioral model of academic predictors of adolescents’ life satisfaction. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 56–69. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.56
45.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
46.
TaylorS. E. (2011). Social support: A review. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), Oxford handbook of health psychology (pp.189–214). Oxford University Press.
47.
TennantJ. E.DemarayM.MaleckiC.TerryM.ClaryM.ElzingaN. (2015). Students’ ratings of teacher support and academic and social-emotional well-being. School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 30(4), 494–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000106
48.
TintoV. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089
49.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
50.
TompkinsK. A.BrechtK.TuckerB.NeanderL. L.SwiftJ. K. (2016). Who matters most? The contribution of faculty, student-peers, and outside support in predicting graduate student satisfaction. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 10(2), 102–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tep0000115
51.
UmbachP. D.WawrzynskiM. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1
52.
VallerandR. J.BlssonnetteR. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60(3), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00922.x
53.
WalkerC. O.GreeneB. A.MansellR. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation and self efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004
54.
WethingtonE.KesslerR. (1986). Perceived support, received support, and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27(1), 78–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2136504
55.
Young-JonesA.BurtT.YadonC.CarrM. (2012). Dynamic duo of faculty and advisors: Implications for student success based on academic support [Poster presentation]. 58th Annual Meeting of Southwestern Psychological Association, Oklahoma City, OK.
56.
YvesR. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
57.
ZimetG.DahlemN. W.ZimetS. G.FarleyG. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
