Normal and Maladaptive Personality Traits as Predictors of Motives for Social Media Use and Its Effects on Well-Being

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the motives for social media sites use in the general population and determine what personality traits (normal and maladaptive) predict different motives for social media sites use. Another objective was to analyze which motives for SMSs use are related to well-being. The sample consisted of 420 subjects (211 men, 209 women), mean age 40.29 years (SD = 14.93). Data were gathered using the Big Five Inventory, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form -Adult, the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form, and a scale designed ad hoc to evaluate the motives for social media sites use. The results showed that the most frequent motives were Personal relationship maintenance/Search for information, Pastime/Exhibitionism, and Search for companionship. In addition, it was found that normal and, especially, maladaptive personality traits increased the explained variance for the three motives for social media sites use, beyond age and gender. Predictors of relationship initiation and pastime/exhibitionism motives were related to more negative features (e.g., antagonism and disinhibition) than predictors of personal relationship maintenance/search for information. Finally, personal relationship maintenance/search for information was positively related to all the components of well-being, while the other motives for social media sites use were negatively associated with well-being.

Keywords

Social media sites motives normal personality traits maladaptive personality traits well-being

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexa. (2017). The top 500 sites on the web. https://www.alexa.com/topsites

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Amichai-Hamburger

Vinitzky

(2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1289–1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018

Anderson

E. L.

Steen

Stavropoulos

(2017). Internet use and problematic internet use: A systematic review of longitudinal research trends in adolescence and emergent adulthood. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(4), 430–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2016.1227716

Bargh

J. A.

McKenna

K. Y. A.

(2004). The internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573–590.

Barker

(2009). Older adolescents’ motivations for social network site use: The influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(2), 209–213.

Boyd

D. M.

Ellison

N. B.

(2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.

Buckels

E. E.

Trapnell

P. D.

Andjelovic

Paulhus

D. L.

(2018). Internet trolling and everyday sadism: Parallel effects on pain perception and moral judgment. Journal of Personality, 87, 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12393

Burke

Kraut

(2016). The relationship between Facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength: Facebook and well-being. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21, 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12162

10.

Castro Solano

Casullo

M. M.

(2001). Rasgos de personalidad, bienestar psicológico y rendimiento académico en adolescentes argentinos [Personality traits, psychological well-being, and academic achievement of Argentine adolescents]. Interdisciplinaria, 18, 65–85.

11.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

(1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.

12.

Ellison

Vitak

Gray

Lampe

(2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855–870.

13.

Errasti

Amigo

Villadangos

(2017). Emotional uses of Facebook and Twitter: Its relation with empathy, narcissism, and self-esteem in adolescence. Psychological Reports, 120(6), 997–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117713496

14.

Fullwood

Nicholls

Makichi

(2014). We’ve got something for everyone: How individual differences predict different blogging motivations. New Media & Society, 17(9), 1583–1600. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448145302488

15.

George

Mallery

(2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. (10th ed.). Pearson.

16.

Gervasi

A. M.

La Marca

Lombardo

E. M. C.

Mannino

Iacolino

Schimmenti

(2017). Maladaptive personality traits and internet addiction symptoms among young adults: A study based on the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 14(1), 20–28.

17.

Góngora

V. C

Castro Solano

(2017). Assessment of the mental health continuum in a sample of Argentinean adults. Psychology, 8, 303–318. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.83018

18.

Gravetter

Wallnau

(2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (8th ed.). Wadsworth.

19.

Green

(2011). Pushing the social media buttons. Media Development, 58, 12–15.

20.

Hair

Black

W. C.

Babin

B. J.

Anderson

R. E.

(2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education International.

21.

Hampton

Goulet

Rainie

Purcell

(2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Internet & American Life Research Center.

22.

Hanson

Haridakis

(2008). YouTube users watching and sharing the news: A uses and gratifications approach. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(3), 6. https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0011.305

23.

Henderson

Bowley

(2010). Authentic dialogue? The role of “friendship” in a social media recruitment campaign. Journal of Communication Management, 14, 237–257.

24.

Hew

K. F.

(2011). Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.0200

25.

Hollenbaugh

E. E.

Ferris

A. L.

(2014). Facebook self-disclosure: Examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 50–58.

26.

Horzum

M. B.

(2016). Examining the relationship to gender and personality on the purpose of Facebook usage of Turkish university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 319–328.

27.

Kim

Siwek

Wilder

(2017). The Facebook paradox: Effects of Facebooking on individuals’ social relationships and psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00087

28.

Hussain

Griffiths

M. D.

(2018). Problematic social networking site use and comorbid psychiatric disorders: A systematic review of recent large-scale studies. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 686. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00686

29.

Jin

Lin

J.-S.

Gilbreath

Lee

Y.-I.

(2017). Motivations, consumption emotions, and temporal orientations in social media use: A strategic approach to engaging stakeholders across platforms. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 11, 115‒132. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2017.1285769

30.

John

O. P.

Donahue

E. M.

Kentle

R. L.

(1991). The Big Five Inventory–Versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.

31.

Katz

Blumler

J. G.

Gurevitch

(1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523.

32.

Kayiş

A. R.

Satici

S. A.

Yilmaz

M. F.

Şimşek

Ceyhan

Bakioğlu

(2016). Big five-personality trait and internet addiction: A meta-analytic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.012

33.

Keyes

C. L. M.

(1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787065

34.

Keyes

C. L. M.

(2005). The subjective well-being of America’s youth: Toward a comprehensive assessment. Adolescent & Family Health, 4, 3–11.

35.

Kircaburun

Alhabash

Tosuntaş

Ş. B.

Griffiths

M. D.

(2018). Uses and gratifications of problematic social media use among university students: A simultaneous examination of the big five of personality traits, social media platforms, and social media use motives. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9940-6

36.

Kraut

Kiesler

Boneva

Cummings

Helgeson

Crawford

(2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00248

37.

Kraut

Patterson

Lundmark

Kiesler

Mukopadhyay

Scherlis

(1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017–1031. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.53.9.10177

38.

Krueger

R. F.

Derringer

Markon

K. E.

Watson

Skodol

A. E.

(2013). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5—Brief Form (PID-5-BF)—Adult. American Psychiatric Association.

39.

Laier

Wegmann

Brand

(2018). Personality and cognition in gamers: Avoidance expectancies mediate the relationship between maladaptive personality traits and symptoms of internet-gaming disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 304. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00304

40.

Luchman

J. N.

Bergstrom

Krulikowski

(2014). A motives framework of social media website use: A survey of young Americans. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.016

41.

Lupano Perugini

M. L.

de la Iglesia

Castro Solano

Keyes

C. L. M.

(2017). The Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) in the Argentinean context: Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance. Europe Journal of Psychology, 13, 93–108. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v13i1.1163

42.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Podsakoff

P. M.

(2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555.

43.

Mancinelli

Bassi

Salcuni

(2019). Predisposing and motivational factors related to social network sites use: Systematic review. JMIR Formative Research, 3(2), e12248. https://doi.org/10.2196/12248

44.

Manuoğlu

Uysal

(2019). Motivation for different Facebook activities and well-being: A daily experience sampling study. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. Advance online publication. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000262

45.

Marino

Caselli

& Spada, (2018). Motives to use Facebook and problematic Facebook use in adolescents. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(2), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.32

46.

Nie

Sousa-Poza

Nimrod

(2015). Internet use and subjective well-being in China. Social Indicators Research, 132, 489–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1227-8

47.

Oliden

P. O.

Zumbo

B. D.

(2008). Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenada. Psicothema, 20(4), 896–901.

48.

Papacharissi

Mendelson

(2011). Toward a new(er) sociability: Uses, gratifications and social capital on Facebook. In Papathanassopoulos

(Ed.), Media perspectives for the 21st century (pp. 212–230). Routledge.

49.

Papacharissi

Rubin

A. M.

(2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175–196.

50.

Park

Kee

K. F.

Valenzuela

(2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901.

51.

Pornsakulvanich

(2018). Excessive use of Facebook: The influence of self-monitoring and Facebook usage on social support. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39, 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.02.001

52.

Ramirez

Jr. Broneck

(2009). IM me’: Instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Journal of Social and Personal, 26(2–3), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509106719

53.

Rubin

A. M.

(1993). Audience activity and media use. Communications Monographs, 60(1), 98–105.

54.

Rubin

A. M.

(2002). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In Bryant

Zillmann

(Eds.), LEA’s communication series. Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 525–548). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

55.

Ruggiero

T. E.

(2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02

56.

Ryan

Xenos

(2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1658–1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004

57.

Ryff

C. D.

(1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

58.

Sanecka

(2017). The dark side of social media: Associations between the Dark Triad of personality, self-disclosure online and selfie-related behaviours. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 2, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20172.71.88

59.

Satici

S. A.

Uysal

(2015). Well-being and problematic Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.005

60.

Schimmenti

Musetti

Costanzo

Terrone

Maganuco

N. R.

Rinella

C. A.

Gervasi

A. M.

(2019). The unfabulous four: Maladaptive personality functioning, insecure attachment, dissociative experiences, and problematic internet use among young adults. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00079-0

61.

Seidman

(2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 402–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009

62.

Shane-Simpson

Manago

Gaggi

Gillespie-Lynch

(2018). Why do college students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.041

63.

Sheldon

(2008). Student favorite: Facebook and motives for its use. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 23(2), 39–53.

64.

Sheldon

(2009). Maintain or develop new relationships? Gender differences in Facebook use. Rocky Mountain Communication Review, 6(1), 51–56.

65.

Sheldon

Bryant

(2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89–97.

66.

Smock

A. D.

Ellison

N. B.

Lampe

Wohn

D. Y.

(2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322–2329.

67.

Special

Li-Barber

(2012). Self-disclosure and student satisfaction with Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 624–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.008

68.

Stieger

(2019). Facebook usage and life satisfaction. Frontiers in Psycholology, 10, 2711. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02711

69.

Stoycheff

Liu

Wibowo

K. A.

Nanni

D. P.

(2017). What have we learned about social media by studying Facebook? A decade in review. New Media & Society, 19(6), 968–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817695745

70.

Süral

Griffiths

M. D.

Kircaburun

Emirtekin

(2019). Trait emotional intelligence and problematic social media use among adults: The mediating role of social media use motives. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17(2), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-0022-6

71.

Tausczik

Y. R.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54.

72.

Tsitsika

A. K.

Tzavela

E. C.

Janikian

Olafsson

Iordache

Schoenmakers

T. M.

, Tzavara, C., & Richardson, C. (2014). Online social networking in adolescence: Patterns of use in six European Countries and links with psychosocial functioning. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(1), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.010

73.

Whiting

Williams

(2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research, 16(4), 362–369.

74.

Zimmermann

Altenstein

Krieger

Holtforth

M. G.

Pretsch

Alexopoulos

Spitzer

Benecke

Krueger

R. F.

Markon

K. E.

Leising

(2014). The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits: Findings from two German-speaking samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(4), 518–540. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_130