Since the original Freedman and Fraser studies were published, a great amount of research using the foot-in-the-door tactic has revealed its effectiveness. Nevertheless, the effect sizes reported in meta-analysis studies tend to be low and the effect size obtained by Freedman and Fraser in their studies has never been obtained again. We conducted a direct replication of the original foot-in-the-door experiment in two time intervals and in two countries. The results indicate a drop of compliance over time. The results reveal that, while in 2003 the foot-in-the-door strategy was effective in Ukraine and ineffective in Poland, in 2013, the effect was insignificant in both Ukraine and Poland. The results are explained by high ecological validity of the foot-in-the-door procedure.
BemD. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (
vol. 6, pp. 1–62).
New York, NY:
Academic Press.
2.
BeamanA. L.ColeC. M.PrestonM.KlentzB.SteblayN. M. (1983).
Fifteen years of foot-in-the-door research: A meta analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
9(2), 181–196. doi:10.1177/0146167283092002
3.
BurgerJ. M. (1999).
The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review,
3(4), 303–325. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_2
4.
BurgerJ. M.CaldwellD. F. (2003).
The effects of monetary incentives and labeling on the foot-in-the-door effect: Evidence for a self-perception process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,
25(3), 235–241. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2503_06
5.
BurgerJ. M.GuadagnoR. E. (2003).
Self-concept clarity and the foot-in-the-door procedure. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,
25(1), 79–86. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2501_6
6.
Central Europe risks downgrades on worsening finances (update1) (2009, September 21). Bloomberg. Retrieved from http://bloomberg.com
7.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R.NewsomJ. T. (1995).
Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
69(2), 318–328. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.318
8.
DeJongW.FunderD. (1977).
Effect of payment for initial compliance: Unanswered questions about the foot-in-the-door phenomenon. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
3(4), 662–665. doi:10.1177/014616727700300421
9.
DeJongW.MusilliL. (1982).
External pressure to comply: Handicapped versus nonhandicapped requesters and the foot-in-the-door phenomenon. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
8(3), 522–527. doi:10.1177/0146167282083020
10.
DillardJ. P. (1990).
Self-inference and the foot-in-the-door technique: Quantity of behavior and attitudinal mediation. Human Communication Research,
16(3), 422–447. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1990.tb00218.x
11.
DillardJ. P.HunterJ. E.BurgoonM. (1984).
Sequential request persuasive strategies: Meta analysis of foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face. Human Communication Research,
10(4), 461–488. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00028.x
12.
DolinskaB.DolinskiD. (2006).
To command or to ask? Gender and effectiveness of “tough” vs “soft” compliance-gaining strategies. Social Influence,
1(1), 48–57. doi:10.1080/15534510500314571
13.
DolinskiD. (2000).
On inferring one’s beliefs from one’s attempts and consequences for subsequent compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
78(2), 260–272. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.260
14.
DolinskiD. (2016). Techniques of social influence: The psychology of gaining compliance.
London, England:
Taylor & Francis Group.
15.
ESOMAR. (2010). Global market research 2010: An ESOMAR industry report.
Amsterdam, the Netherlands:
Author.
16.
ESOMAR. (2011). Global market research 2011: An ESOMAR industry report.
Amsterdam, the Netherlands:
Author.
17.
ESOMAR. (2012). Global market research 2012: An ESOMAR industry report.
Amsterdam, the Netherlands:
Author.
18.
ESOMAR. (2013). Global market research 2013: An ESOMAR industry report.
Amsterdam, the Netherlands:
Author.
FrancisG. (2012).
The psychology of replication and replication in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science,
7(6), 585–594. doi:10.1177/1745691612459520
21.
FreedmanJ. L.FraserS. C. (1966).
Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
4(2), 195–202. doi:10.1037/h0023552
22.
Gamian-WilkM.Lachowicz-TabaczekK. (2007).
Implicit theories and compliance with the foot-in-the-door technique. Polish Psychological Bulletin,
38(1), 50–63.
23.
Gamian-WilkM.Lachowicz-TabaczekK. (2009).
The belief to have fixed or malleable traits and help giving: Implicit theories and sequential social influence techniques. Polish Psychological Bulletin,
40(2), 85–100. doi:10.2478/s10059-009-0009-z
24.
GirandolaF. (2002).
Sequential requests and organ donation. Journal of Social Psychology,
142(2), 171–178. doi:10.1080/00224540209603893
25.
GoldmanM.CreasonC. R.McCallC. G. (1981).
Compliance employing a two-feet-in-the-door procedure. The Journal of Social Psychology,
114(2), 259–265. doi:10.1080/00224545.1981.9922755
26.
GorassiniD. R.OlsonJ. M. (1995).
Does self-perception change explain the foot-in-the-door effect?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
69(1), 91–105. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.91
GuéguenN. (2001).
Social labeling and compliance: An evaluation of the link between the label and the request. Social Behavior and Personality,
29(8), 743–748.
KooleS. L.LakensD. (2012).
Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science,
7(6), 608–614. doi:10.1177/1745691612462586
LepperM. R. (1973).
Dissonance, self-perception, and honesty in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
25(1), 65–74. doi:10.1037/h0034269
LokhorstA. M.WernerC.StaatsH.van DijkE.GaleJ. L. (2011).
Commitment and behavior change: A meta-analysis and critical review of commitment-making strategies in environmental research. Environment and Behavior,
45(1), 3–34. doi:10.1177/0013916511411477
35.
MillerR. L.SulsJ. (1977).
Helping, self-attribution, and size of an initial request. Journal of Social Psychology,
103(2), 203–208. doi:10.1080/00224545.1977.9713318
36.
NawratR. (1989).
Manipulacja społeczna: Przegląd technik i wybranych wyników badań. [Social manipulation: The review of social influence techniques literaturȩ ]. Przegląd Psychologiczny,
32, 125–154.
37.
NosekB. A.SpiesJ. R.MotylM. (2012).
Science utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science,
7(6), 615–631. doi:10.1177/1745691612459058
38.
PascualA.GuéguenN. (2005).
Foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face: A comparative meta-analytic study. Psychological Reports,
96(1), 122–128. doi:10.2466/pr0.96.1.122-128
39.
PascualA.GuéguenN.PujosS.FelonneauM.-L. (2012).
Foot-in-the-door and problematic requests: A field experiment. Social Influence,
8(1), 46–53. doi:10.1080/15534510.2012.696038
40.
PashlerH.HarrisC. R. (2012).
Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science,
7(6), 531–536. doi:10.1177/1745691612463401
41.
PratkanisA. (2007). An introduction to social influence research. In PratkanisA. R. (Ed.), The science of social influence: Advances and future progress (pp. 1–15).
New York, NY:
Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group.
42.
PrislinR.CranoW. D. (2012). A history of social influence research. In KruglanskiA. W.StroebeW. (Eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 321–340).
New York, NY:
Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group.
43.
Skandrani-MarzoukiI.MarzoukiY.JouleR.-V. (2012).
Effects of subliminal affective priming on helping behavior using the foot-in-the-door technique. Psychological Reports: Mental & Physical Health,
111(3), 669–686. doi:10.2466/07.17.21.PR0.111.6.669-686
44.
SnyderM.CunninghamM. R. (1975).
To comply or not comply: Testing the self-perception explanation of the “foot-in-the-door” phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
31(1), 64–67. doi:10.1037/h0076245
45.
SouchetL.GirandolaF. (2013).
Double foot-in-the-door, social representations, and environment: Application for energy savings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
43(2), 306–315. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01000.x
46.
StimpsonD. V.WaranusuntikuleS. (1987).
Mediating effects of material payment, social reinforcement, and familiarity on foot-in-the-door phenomena in Thailand. The Journal of Psychology,
121(5), 515–520. doi:10.1080/00223980.1987.9915505
UranowitzS. W. (1975).
Helping and self-attributions: A field experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
31(5), 852–854. doi:10.1037/h0076690
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
