This research examined the relationships between leader motivating language and employee task and contextual performance using the psychological mechanism of feedback quality. We obtained a sample of 237 supervisor–subordinate dyads. Our research findings showed that feedback quality had a positive mediating role in the relationship between leader motivating language and contextual performance. The relationship between leader motivating language and task performance was statistically significant; however, feedback quality had little effect in mediating the direct relationship between leader motivating language and task performance.
AnseelF.LievensF. (2007).
The long-term impact of the feedback environment on job satisfaction: A field study in a Belgian context. Applied Psychology,
56, 254–266. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00253.x
2.
BachrachD. G.WangH.BendolyE.ZhangS. (2007).
Importance of organizational citizenship behaviour for overall performance evaluation: Comparing the role of task interdependence in China and the USA. Management and Organization Review,
3, 255–276. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00071.x
3.
BormanW. C.MotowidloS. J. (1997).
Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance,
10, 99–109.
4.
BrislinR. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In TriandisH. C.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (vol. 2, pp. 389–444).
Boston, MA:
Allyn & Bacon.
5.
BrowerH. H.FiolC. M.EmrichC. G. (2007).
The language of leaders. Journal of Leadership Studies,
1, 67–80. doi:10.1002/jls.20026
6.
CampbellJ. P.McHenryJ. J.WiseL. L. (1990).
Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Personnel Psychology,
43, 313–333. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01561.x
7.
ChristianM. S.GarzaA. S.SlaughterJ. E. (2011).
Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology,
64, 89–136. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
8.
DuttonJ. E.WorkmanK. M.HardinA. E. (2014).
Compassion at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior,
1, 277–304. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091221
9.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1976).
Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,
16, 250–279. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
10.
IacobucciD.SaldanhaN.DengX. (2007).
A meditation on mediation: Evidence that structural equations models perform better than regressions. Journal of Consumer Psychology,
17, 139–153. doi:10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70020-7
11.
JohnsonJ. W. (2001).
The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,
86, 984–996. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.984
12.
KlugerA. N.DeNisiA. (1996).
The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin,
119, 254–284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
13.
LamC. F.DeRueD. S.KaramE. P.HollenbeckJ. R. (2011).
The impact of feedback frequency on learning and task performance: Challenging the “more is better” assumption. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
116, 217–228. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.002
14.
LinC.-C.PengT.-K. (2010).
From organizational citizenship behaviour to team performance: The mediation of group cohesion and collective efficacy. Management and Organization Review,
6, 55–75. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00172.x
15.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
16.
MacKinnonD. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis.
Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
17.
MadlockP. E. (2013).
The influence of motivational language in the technologically mediated realm of telecommuters. Human Resource Management Journal,
23, 196–210. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2012.00191.x
18.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. (2007).
The effects of leader communication on a worker’s intent to stay: An investigation using structural equation modeling. Human Performance,
20, 85–102. doi:10.1080/08959280701332018
19.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. (2009).
The role of leader motivating language in employee absenteeism. Journal of Business Communication,
46, 455–479. doi:10.1177/0021943609338665
20.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. (2012).
The relationship between leader motivating language and self-efficacy: A partial least squares model analysis. Journal of Business Communication,
49, 357–376. doi:10.1177/0021943612456036
21.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. (2016). The diffusion process of strategic motivating language: An examination of the internal organizational environment and emergent properties. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2329488416629093
22.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. (2018). Motivating language theory: Effective leader talk in the workplace.
Cham, Switzerland:
Springer International Publishing.
23.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM.KopfJ. (1998).
The effects of leader motivating language on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Human Resource Management,
37, 235–248. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199823/24)37:3/4<235::AID-HRM6>3.0.CO;2-X
24.
MayfieldM.MayfieldJ. (2015).
The effects of leader motivating language use on employee decision making. International Journal of Business Communication,
53, 465–484. doi:10.1177/2329488415572787
25.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998/2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.).
Los Angeles, CA:
Muthén & Muthén.
26.
OldhamG. R.FriedY. (2016).
Job design research and theory: Past, present and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
136, 20–35. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.002
27.
PengJ.-C.ChiuS.-F. (2010).
An integrative model linking feedback environment and organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology,
150, 582–607. doi:10.1080/00224540903365455
28.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003).
Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology,
88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
29.
RosenC. C.LevyP. E.HallR. J. (2006).
Placing perceptions of politics in the context of the feedback environment, employee attitudes, and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,
91, 211–220. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.211
30.
SalancikG. R.PfefferJ. (1978).
A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly,
23, 224–253. doi:10.2307/2392563
31.
SchraubE. M.MichelA.ShemlaM.SonntagK. (2012).
The roles of leader emotion management and team conflict for team members' personal initiative: A multilevel perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,
23, 263–276. doi:10.1080/1359432x.2012.728700
32.
SteelmanL. A.LevyP. E.SnellA. F. (2004).
The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement,
64, 165–184. doi:10.1177/0013164403258440
33.
SullivanJ. J. (1988).
Three roles of language in motivation theory. Academy of Management Review,
13, 104–115. doi:10.5465/amr.1988.4306798
34.
Van QuaquebekeN.FelpsW. (2018).
Respectful inquiry: A motivational account of leading through asking open questions and listening. Academy of Management Review,
43, 5–27. doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0537
35.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (1st ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
36.
WhitakerB. G.DahlingJ. J.LevyP. (2007).
The development of a feedback environment and role clarity model of job performance. Journal of Management,
33, 570–591. doi:10.1177/0149206306297581
37.
WhitakerB. G.LevyP. (2012).
Linking feedback quality and goal orientation to feedback seeking and job performance. Human Performance,
25, 159–178. doi:10.1080/08959285.2012.658927
38.
WilliamsL. J.AndersonS. E. (1991).
Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management,
17, 601–617. doi:10.1177/014920639101700305
39.
YuklG. A. (2012). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.).
Boston, MA:
Pearson.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
