A cognitive bias known as the sunk cost effect has been found across a number of contexts. This bias drives the continued investment of time, effort, or money into an endeavor on the basis of prior investments into it. In Studies 1 and 2, we attempted to observe whether this effect occurs for short-term behavioral investments. In both studies, a reverse, or no sunk cost effect was found. In Study 3, we attempted to find an effect using hypothetical scenarios that were analagous to the behavioral investments presented in Study 1. This also failed to reveal an effect. Finally, Study 4 was an attempt to replicate a previously used hypothetical investment scenario; with results this time revealing the effect. A number of explanations for this pattern of results, such as participation and salient physical exertion, are discussed, with the possibility that some short-term behavioral investments are not subject to the sunk cost effect.
ArkesH. R. (1996) The psychology of waste. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making9(3): 213–224. doi:10.1002/(Sici)1099-0771(199609)9:3<213::Aid-Bdm230>3.0.Co;2-1.
2.
ArkesH. R.AytonP. (1999) The sunk cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals?Psychological Bulletin125(5): 591–600. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.125.5.591.
3.
ArkesH. R.BlumerC. (1985) The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes35(1): 124–140. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4.
4.
ArkesH. R.HutzelL. (2000) The role of probability of success estimates in the sunk cost effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making13(3): 295–306. doi:10.1002/1099-0771(200007/09)13:3<295::Aid-Bdm353>3.0.Co;2-6.
5.
AvilaR.YankelevitzR. L.GonzalezJ. C.HackenbergT. D. (2013) Varying the costs of sunk costs: Optimal and non-optimal choices in a sunk-cost task with humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior100(2): 165–173. doi:10.1002/jeab.42.
6.
BravermanJ. A.Blumenthal-BarbyJ. S. (2012) Assessment of the sunk-cost effect in clinical decision-making. Social Science & Medicine75(1): 186–192. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.006.
7.
ColemanM. D. (2009) Sunk cost and commitment to dates arranged online. Current Psychology28(1): 45–54. doi:10.1007/s12144-009-9042-5.
8.
ColemanM. D. (2010) Sunk cost and commitment to medical treatment. Current Psychology29(2): 121–134. doi:10.1007/s12144-010-9077-7.
GarlandH. (1990) Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to an ongoing project. Journal of Applied Psychology75(6): 728–731. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.728.
12.
GarlandH.ConlonD. E. (1998) Too close to quit: The role of project completion in maintaining commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology28(22): 2025–2048.
13.
HeathC. (1995) Escalation and de-escalation of commitment in response to sunk costs: The role of budgeting in mental accounting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes62(1): 38–54. doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1029.
14.
HoT.-H.PngI. P. L.RezaS. (2017) Sunk cost fallacy in driving the world’s costliest cars. Management Science64(4): 1477–1973. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2651.
15.
JustD. R.WansinkB. (2011) The flat-rate pricing paradox: Conflicting effects of “All-You-Can-Eat” buffet pricing. The Review of Economics and Statistics93(1): 193–200. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00057.
16.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979) Prospect theory—Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica47(2): 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185.
17.
KirkpatrickL. A.EpsteinS. (1992) Cognitive experiential self-theory and subjective-probability—Further evidence for 2 conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63(4): 534–544. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.534.
18.
KuhbergerA.Schulte-MecklenbeckM.PernerJ. (2002) Framing decisions: Hypothetical and real. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes89(2): 1162–1175. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00021-3.
19.
LoewensteinG. (1996) Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes65(3): 272–292. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0028.
MacaskillA. C.HackenbergT. D. (2012) The sunk cost effect with pigeons: Some determinants of decisions about persistence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior97(1): 85–100.
22.
MacaskillA. C.HackenbergT. D. (2013) Optimal and nonoptimal choice in a laboratory-based sunk cost task with humans: A cross-species replication. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior100(3): 301–315. doi:10.1002/jeab.52.
23.
MagalhãesP.WhiteK. G. (2014a) Persistence in extinction: The sunk time effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes40(1): 38–54. doi:10.1037/xan0000009.
24.
MagalhãesP.WhiteK. G. (2014b) A good time to leave?: The sunk time effect in pigeons. Behavioral Processes105: 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.010.
25.
MagalhãesP.WhiteK. G. (2016) The sunk cost effect across species: A review of persistence in a course of action due to prior investment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior105(3): 339–361. doi:10.1002/jeab.202.
26.
MagalhãesP.WhiteK. G.StewartT.BeebyE.Van Der VlietW. (2012) Suboptimal choice in nonhuman animals: Rats commit the sunk cost error. Learning and Behavior40(2): 195–206. doi:10.3758/s13420-011-0055-110.1037/0033-2909.125.5.591.
27.
MáñezJ. A.Rochina-BarrachinaM. E.SanchisA.SanchisJ. A. (2009) The role of sunk costs in the decision to invest in R&D. The Journal of Industrial Economics57(4): 712–735. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00398.x.
28.
MaxwellS. E.LauM. Y.HowardG. S. (2015) Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean?American Psychologist70(6): 487–498. doi:10.1037/a0039400.
29.
NavarroA. D.FantinoE. (2005) The sunk cost effect in pigeons and humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior83(1): 1–13.
30.
NavarroA. D.FantinoE. (2009) The sunk-time effect: An exploration. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making22(3): 252–270. doi:10.1002/Bdm.624.
31.
ParkJ. Y.JangS. (2014) Sunk costs and travel cancellation: Focusing on temporal cost. Tourism Management40: 425–435. doi:10.1016/J.Tourman.2013.08.005.
32.
SalterK. C.FawcettR. F. (1993) The art test of interaction: A robust and powerful rank test of interaction in factorial models. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation22(1): 137–153. doi:10.1080/03610919308813085.
33.
SimonsonI.NyeP. (1992) The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes51(3): 416–446. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90020-8.
34.
SofisM. J.JarmolowiczD. P.HudnallJ. L.ReedD. D. (2015) On sunk costs and escalation. Psychological Record65(3): 487–494. doi:10.1007/s40732-015-0124-5.
35.
SomanD. (2001) The mental accounting of sunk time costs: Why time is not like money. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making14(3): 169–185. doi:10.1002/Bdm.370.
36.
StawB. M. (1976) Knee-deep in big muddy—Study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance16(1): 27–44. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2.
37.
StawB. M.HoangH. (1995) Sunk costs in the Nba—Why draft order affects playing Time and survival in professional basketball. Administrative Science Quarterly40(3): 474–494. doi:10.2307/2393794.
38.
StroughJ.SchlosnagleL.DidonatoL. (2011) Understanding decisions about sunk costs from older and younger adults’ perspectives. Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences66(6): 681–686. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbr057.
39.
StroughJ.SchlosnagleL.KarnsT.LemasterP.PichayayothinN. (2014) No time to waste: Restricting life-span temporal horizons decreases the sunk-cost fallacy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making27(1): 78–94. doi:10.1002/bdm.1781.
40.
TanH. T.YatesJ. F. (1995) Sunk cost effects: The influences of instruction and future return estimates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes63(3): 311–319. doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1082.
41.
ThalerR. (1980) Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization1(1): 39–60. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7.
42.
The-Open-Science-Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science349(6251): 1–8. doi:ARTN aac471610.1126/science.aac4716.
43.
WobbrockJ. O.FindlaterL.GergleD.HigginsJ. J. (2011) The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY: ACM, pp. 143–146.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
