Previous research has found that a negative life event is a main risk factor for hopelessness, which in turn is considered to be a proximal cause of major depression disorder and a suicide risk factor. Unfortunately, very little attention has been paid to the role of decision-making constructs between negative life events and hopelessness. To fill this gap, the present study aims to test the moderation role of sunk cost propensity in this relationship, which is an over-generalized tendency to persist, based on past investment. A total of 495 university students completed assessment of their resistance to sunk cost propensity, whereas the negative life events, hopelessness, mental health state (depression, anxiety) and big-five personality traits were measured by various questionnaires. Participants’ tendency to resist sunk cost propensity moderated the relationship between negative life events and hopelessness. Individuals who tended to resist sunk cost bias are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of negative life events. This effect is still significant, even after controlling for individuals’ psychological well-being (depression, anxiety) and big-five personality traits. The current findings provide preliminary evidence that resistance to sunk cost propensity may be an important characteristic associated with an individual’s hopelessness when exposed to a negative life event.
AbramsonL. Y.MetalskyG. I.AlloyL. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 96(2), 358–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.358
2.
BarnettP. A.GotlibI. H. (1988). Psychosocial functioning and depression: Distinguishing among antecedents, concomitants, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 97–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.97
3.
BauerB. W.HomM. A.KarnickA. T.CharpentierC. J.KeeferL. A.CapronD. W.BryanC. J. (2022). Does hopelessness accurately predict how bad you will feel in the future? Initial evidence of affective forecasting errors in individuals with elevated suicide risk. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 46(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-021-10285-7
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BeckJ. S.NewmanC. F. (1993). Hopelessness, depression, suicidal ideation, and clinical diagnosis of depression. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 23(2), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-278X.1993.tb00378.x
6.
Bruine de BruinW.ParkerA. M.FischhoffB. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 938–956. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938
7.
ChangE. C.SannaL. J.HirschJ. K.JeglicE. L. (2010). Loneliness and negative life events as predictors of hopelessness and suicidal behaviors in Hispanics: Evidence for a diathesis-stress model. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(12), 1242–1253. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20721
8.
ChenM. K.LakshminarayananV.SantosL. (2005). The evolution of our preferences: Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Yale University. https://doi.org/10.1086/503550
9.
ChioquetaA. P.StilesT. C. (2005). Personality traits and the development of depression, hopelessness, and suicide ideation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(6), 1283–1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.08.010
DubersteinP. R.LaurentJ.ConnerK. R.ConwellY.CoxC. (2001). Personality correlates of hopelessness in depressed inpatients 50 years of age and older. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(2), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7702_16
12.
EmichK. J.PyoneJ. S. (2018). Let it go: Positive affect attenuates sunk cost bias by enhancing cognitive flexibility. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(4), 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1030
13.
FengT.PengJ. X.ZhangJ. X.HuoQ. Q.WeiX. (2015). The revision of adult decision-making competence in Chinese young cadets. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23(6), 1028–1031. https://10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.06.016
14.
HaatainenK. M.TanskanenA.KylmäJ.AntikainenR.HintikkaJ.HonkalampiK.ViinamäkiH. (2003). Life events are important in the course of hopelessness—a 2-year follow-up study in a general population. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38(8), 436–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-003-0660-1
15.
HadlaczkyG.HökbyS.MkrtchianA.WassermanD.BalazsJ.MachínN.CarliV. (2018). Decision-making in suicidal behavior: The protective role of loss aversion. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00116.
16.
Haita-FalahC. (2017). Sunk-cost fallacy and cognitive ability in individual decision-making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 58(C), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.12.001
17.
HayesJ.WardC. L. P.McGregorI. (2016). Why bother? Death, failure, and fatalistic withdrawal from life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(1), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000039
HudsonC. G. (2005). Socioeconomic status and mental illness: Tests of the social causation and selection hypotheses. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.75.1.3
20.
JarmolowiczD. P.BickelW. K.SofisM. J.HatzL. E.MuellerE. T. (2016). Sunk costs, psychological symptomology, and help seeking. Springerplus, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3402-z
21.
JollantF.GuillaumeS.JaussentI.BellivierF.LeboyerM.CastelnauD.CourtetP. (2007). Psychiatric diagnoses and personality traits associated with disadvantageous decision-making. European Psychiatry, 22(7), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.06.001
22.
JonasE.McGregorI.KlacklJ.AgroskinD.FritscheI.HolbrookC.QuirinM. (2014). Advances in experimental social psychology. In OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.) Threat and Defense: From Anxiety to Approach, (49, pp. 219–286). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800052-6.00004-4
23.
KarvelisP.DiaconescuA. O. (2022). A computational model of hopelessness and active-escape bias in suicidality. Computational Psychiatry, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/cpsy.80
24.
KlingerE. (1975). Consequences of commitment to and disengagement from incentives. Psychological Review, 82(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076171
25.
KongY. Y.ZhangJ.JiaS.H. (2007). Reliability and validity of the Beck hopelessness scale for adolescent. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 21(10), 686. https://10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.001
26.
LiH.LinC. D.BrayM. A.KehleT. J. (2005). The measurement of stressful events in Chinese college students. Psychology in the Schools, 42(3), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20082
27.
LiY. J.KenrickD. T.GriskeviciusV.NeubergS. L. (2012). Economic decision biases and fundamental motivations: How mating and self-protection alter loss aversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025844
28.
LinY. E.FanW. M.ChihH. H. (2014). Throwing good money after bad? The impact of the escalation of commitment of mutual fund managers on fund performance. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2013.849706
29.
LiuR. T.KleimanE. M.NestorB. A.CheekS. M. (2015). The hopelessness theory of depression: A quarter-century in review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 22(4), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12125
30.
Mac GiollabhuiN.HamiltonJ. L.NielsenJ.ConnollyS. L.StangeJ. P.VargaS.BurdetteE.OlinoT. M.AbramsonL. Y.AlloyL. B. (2018). Negative cognitive style interacts with negative life events to predict first onset of a major depressive episode in adolescence via hopelessness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000301
31.
McConnellA. R.RenaudJ. M.DeanK. K.GreenS. P.LamoreauxM. J.HallC. E.RydellR. J. (2005). Whose self is it anyway? Self-aspect control moderates the relation between self-complexity and well-being. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.004
32.
McGregorI.GailliotM. T.VasquezN. A.NashK. A. (2007). Ideological and personal zeal reactions to threat among people with high self-esteem: Motivated promotion focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(11), 1587–1599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207306280
33.
Nunes-CostaR.SerraM.SousaT.LeiteÂ. (2019). Being psychologically abused is not enough into ending a relationship: Sunk cost effect in intimate abusive relationships. Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 53(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.30849/RIP/IJP.V53I3.1157
Pot-KolderR.VelingW.CounotteJ.Van Der GaagM. (2018). Self-reported cognitive biases moderate the associations between social stress and paranoid ideation in a virtual reality experimental study. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 44(4), 749–756. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbx119
36.
RegoS.ArantesJ.MagalhãesP. (2018). Is there a sunk cost effect in committed relationships?Current Psychology, 37(3), 508–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9529-9
37.
RomensS. E.AbramsonL. Y.AlloyL. B. (2009). High and low cognitive risk for depression: Stability from late adolescence to early adulthood. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33(5), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-008-9219-5
38.
SiniverE.MealemY.YanivG. (2013). Overeating in all-you-can-eat buffet: Paying before versus paying after. Applied Economics, 45(35), 4940–4948. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2013.808309
39.
SofisM. J.LemleyS. M.BudneyA. J.StangerC.JarmolowiczD. P. (2020). Persisting on the past: Cross-sectional and prospective associations between sunk cost propensity and cannabis use. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 28(2), 225. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000299
40.
Sokol-HessnerP.RutledgeR. B. (2019). The psychological and neural basis of loss aversion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418806510
41.
StahlJ. C.JacobsonJ. A.MemphisArkesT. N. H. R.AytonP. (2007, January1999). Effects of negative and positive life events on levels of causal uncertaintyPoster accepted for presentation at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social PsychologyThe sunk cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals?Psychological Bulletin, 125(5), 591–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.591
42.
StanovichK. E.WestR. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–665. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00003435
43.
StarrL. R.DavilaJ. (2012). Responding to anxiety with rumination and hopelessness: Mechanism of anxiety-depression symptom co-occurrence?Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(4), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-011-9363-1
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.21
49.
TaylorS. E.KemenyM. E.ReedG. M.BowerJ. E.GruenewaldT. L. (2000). Psychological resources, positive illusions, and health. American Psychologist, 55(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.99
50.
ThompsonE. A.MazzaJ. J.HertingJ. R.RandellB. P.EggertL. L. (2005). The mediating roles of anxiety depression, and hopelessness on adolescent suicidal behaviors. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 35(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.35.1.14.59266
WatzekJ.BrosnanS. F. (2020). Capuchin and rhesus monkeys show sunk cost effects in a psychomotor task. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77301-w
53.
WilkeA.HutchinsonJ. M.ToddP. M.CzienskowskiU. (2009). Fishing for the right words: Decision rules for human foraging behavior in internal search tasks. Cognitive Science, 33(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01020.x
54.
WongK. F. E.KwongJ. Y. Y. (2007). The role of anticipated regret in escalation of commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.545
55.
WroschC.ScheierM. F.CarverC. S.SchulzR. (2003). The importance of goal disengagement in adaptive self-regulation: When giving up is beneficial. Self and Identity, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309021
56.
YaoR. S.LiangL. Y. (2010). Analysis of the application of simplified NEO-FFI to undergraduates. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18(1), 457–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.99
