The 15-item version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) is widely employed to assess depression in old people, but it is unclear if there are biases in the total score depending on respondents’ gender and age. In the current study, we investigated the measurement equivalence of the GDS-15 to provide evidence that the test is a fair screening tool when administered to young-old, old-old, and oldest-old men and women. Item Response Theory-based Differential Item Functioning analyses were applied on a large sample of Italian old people. One item exhibited Differential Item Functioning when comparing men and women, and one item showed Differential Item Functioning across different age-groups. Nonetheless, the magnitude of Differential Item Functioning was small and did not produce any differential test functioning. The gender and age measurement equivalence of the GDS-15 confirms that the test can be used for clinical and research screening purposes.
AzulaiA.WalshC. A. (2015) Screening for geriatric depression in residential care facilities: a systematic narrative review. Journal of Gerontological Social Work58(1): 20–45.
2.
BakerF. B.KimS. H. (2004) Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques, New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
3.
BoccardiV.BaroniM.PaolacciL.ErcolaniS.LongoA.GiordanoM.MecocciP. (2016) Anticholinergic burden and functional status in older people with cognitive impairment: Results from the Regal project. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging21(4): 389–396.
4.
BockR. D.AitkinM. (1981) Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika46(4): 443–459.
5.
BroekmanB. F. P.NyuntS. Z.NitiM.JinA. Z.KoS. M.KumarR.NgT. P. (2008) Differential Item Functioning of the Geriatric Depression Scale in an Asian population. Journal of Affective Disorders108(3): 285–290.
6.
CaiL.ThissenD.du ToitS. H. C. (2011) IRTPRO 2.1 for Windows, Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
7.
ChattatR.EllenaL.CucinottaD.SavoraniG.MucciarelliG. (2001) A study on the validity of different short versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics33: 81–86.
8.
ChenW. H.ThissenD. (1997) Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics22(3): 265–289.
9.
ChiesiF.PrimiC.PigliautileM.ErcolaniS.della StaffaM. C.LongoA.MecocciP. (2017) The local reliability of the 15-item version of the Geriatric Depression Scale: An item response theory (IRT) study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research96: 84–88.
10.
EmbretsonS. E.ReiseS. P. (2000) Item response theory for psychologists, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
HidalgoM. D.Galindo-GarreF.Gómez-BenitoJ. (2015) Differential Item Functioning and cut-off scores: Implications for test score interpretation. Anuario de Psicología/The UB Journal of Psychology45(1): 55–69.
12.
IncalziR. A.CesariM.PedoneC.CarboninP. U. (2003) Construct validity of the 15-item geriatric depression scale in older medical inpatients. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology16(1): 23–28.
13.
Jones, J. A., & Raju, N. S. (2000). Differential item and test functioning and cut-off scores in personnel decision making. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans.
14.
LuppaM.SikorskiC.LuckT.EhrekeL.KonnopkaA.WieseB.Riedel-HellerS. G. (2012) Age-and gender-specific prevalence of depression in latest-life—systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders136(3): 212–221.
15.
MantelN.HaenszelW. (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies. Journal of the National Cancer Institute22(4): 719–748.
16.
MarcL. G.RaueP. J.BruceM. L. (2008) Screening performance of the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale in a diverse elderly home care population. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry16(11): 914–921.
17.
MarianiE.MonasteroR.ErcolaniS.RinaldiP.MangialascheF.CostanziE.MecocciP. (2008) Influence of comorbidity and cognitive status on instrumental activities of daily living in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: Results from the ReGAl project. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry23(5): 523–530.
18.
MitchellA. J.BirdV.RizzoM.MeaderN. (2010) Diagnostic validity and added value of the Geriatric Depression Scale for depression in primary care: a meta-analysis of GDS 30 and GDS 15. Journal of Affective Disorders125(1): 10–17.
19.
Nugent, W. R. (2015, January). A Differential Item Functioning (DIF) Study of the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form. Paper presented at the Society for Social Work and Research 19th Annual Conference: The Social and Behavioral Importance of Increased Longevity, New Orleans.
20.
OrlandoM.ThissenD. (2000) Likelihood-based item-fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement24: 50–64.
21.
OrlandoM.ThissenD. (2003) Further investigation of the performance of S-X2: An item-fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement24: 50–64.
22.
PedrabissiL.SantinelloM. (1991) Contributo all'adattamento italiano e taratura della Geriatric Depression Scale. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata198: 3–7.
23.
PenfieldR. D.AlginaJ. (2006) A generalized DIF effect variance estimator for measuring unsigned differential test functioning in mixed format tests. Journal of Educational Measurement43(4): 295–312.
24.
PocklingtonC.GilbodyS.ManeaL.McMillanD. (2016) The diagnostic accuracy of brief versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry31: 837–857.
25.
Rinaldi, P., Mecocci, P., Benedetti, C., Ercolani, S., Bregnocchi, M., Menculini, G., & Cherubini, A. (2003). Validation of the five-item geriatric depression scale in elderly subjects in three different settings. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51(5), 694–698.
26.
StarkS.ChernyshenkoO. S.DrasgowF. (2004) Examining the effects of differential item (functioning and differential) test functioning on selection decisions: when are statistically significant effects practically important?Journal of Applied Psychology89(3): 497.
27.
TangW. K.WongE.ChiuH. F.LumC. M.UngvariG. S. (2005) The Geriatric Depression Scale should be shortened: Results of Rasch analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry20(8): 783–789.
28.
ThissenD.SteinbergL.WainerH. (1988) Use of item response theory in the study of group differences in trace lines. In: WainerH.BraunH. I. (eds) Test validity, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 147–169.
29.
Thomas, M. L. (2011). The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review. Assessment, 18(3), 291–307.
30.
WancataJ.AlexandrowiczR.MarquartB.WeissM.FriedrichF. (2006) The criterion validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale: A systematic review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica114(6): 398–410.
31.
WongpakaranN.WongpakaranT.Van ReekumR. (2013) The use of GDS-15 in detecting MDD: A comparison between residents in a Thai long-term care home and geriatric outpatients. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research5(2): 101–111.
32.
YesavageJ. A.SheikhJ. I. (1986) Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) recent evidence and development of a shorter scale. Clinical Gerontologist5(1–2): 165–173.
33.
ZumboB. D. (2003) Does item-level DIF manifest itself in scale-level analyses? Implications for translating language tests. Language Testing20(2): 136–147.
