The present article describes a new Persian elicited imitation test (EIT) developed for assessing the overall language proficiency of Persian-speaking preschoolers. It reports a study that investigated the power of the EIT in discriminating children’s linguistic abilities through having them repeat sentences of varying lengths and morphosyntactic complexity. The study also explored the relationship between children’s performance on the EIT and their free speech. A total of 119 three- to- six-year-old Iranian monolingual children participated in the study by completing the EIT and an oral narrative task. Results showed that the new EIT can discriminate children with different levels of language abilities. Moreover, positive correlations were found between children’s scores on the EIT and their performance on the oral narrative task. Results suggest that the EIT provides a reliable measure of overall language development, and it can be effectively used to evaluate children’s language proficiency in various contexts.
BachmanL. (1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
2.
BaddeleyA. D.GathercoleS. E.PapagnoC. (1998) The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review105: 158–173. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.158.
3.
Bley-VromanR.ChaudronC. (1994) Elicited imitation as a measure of second-language competence. In: TaroneE.GassS.CohenA. (eds) Research methodology in second-language acquisition, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 245–261.
4.
BockK.LeveltW. J. M. (1994) Language production: Grammatical encoding. In: GernsbacherM. A. (ed.) Handbook of psycholinguistics, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 945–984.
5.
BowdenH. (2016) Assessing second-language oral proficiency for research: The Spanish elicited imitation task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition38: 647–675. doi: 10.1017/S0272263115000443.
6.
Conti-RamsdenG.BottingN.FaragherB. (2001) Psycholinguistic markers for Specific Language Impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry42: 741–748. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00770.
7.
CorriganR.Di PaulL. (1982) Measurement of language production in two-year-olds: A structured laboratory technique. Applied Psycholinguistics3: 223–242. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400001405.
8.
CowanN.DayL.Scott SaultsJ.KellerT. A.JohnsonT.FloresL. (1992) The role of verbal output time in the effects of word length on immediate memory. Journal of Memory and Language31: 1–17. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90002-F.
9.
DevescoviA.CaselliC. (2007) Sentence repetition as a measure of early grammatical development in Italian. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders42(2): 18–208. doi: 10.1080/13682820601030686.
10.
DockrellJ. E. (2001) Assessing language skills in pre-school children. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review6(2): 74–85. doi: 10.1017/S1360641701002532.
11.
Ellis, N. (2001). Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.). Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
12.
ErlamR. (2006) Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics27: 464–491. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml001.
13.
FarhadyH.HedayatiH. (2009) Language assessment policy in Iran. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics29: 132–141. doi: 10.1017/S0267190509090114.
14.
Farhady, H., & Tavassoli, K. (2013). Assessing Farsi. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (4 Vols., 16: 112, pp.1790–1798). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
15.
GallimoreR.TharpR. (1981) The interpretation of elicited imitation in a standardized context. Language Learning31: 369–392. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb01390.x.
16.
GathercoleS. E.BaddeleyA. D. (1993) Working memory and language, Hove, England: LEA.
17.
HagoortP.LeveltW. J. M. (2009) The speaking brain. Science326(5951): 372–373. doi: 10.1126/science.1181675.
18.
HamayanE.SaegertJ.LarudeeP. (1977) Elicited imitation in second language learners. Language and Speech20: 86–97. doi: 10.1177/002383097702000109.
19.
HasanpoorN.JalilevandN.MasumiE.GhorbaniA.KamaliM. (2015) Development of a picture receptive vocabulary test and evaluation of its validity & reliability for normal 36-71 months Persian children. Journal of Paramedical Science and Rehabilitation4(3): 34–43.
20.
HoodL.SchieffelinB. B. (1978) Elicited imitation in two cultural contexts. Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development2(1): 4–12.
21.
JessopL.SuzukiW.TomitaY. (2007) Elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. The Canadian Modern Language Review64: 215–220. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.64.1.215.
22.
KazemiY.TaheriA.KianfarF.ShafieiM.EslamifardR.PirmoradianM.NourianF. (2012) Mean length of utterance (MLU) in typically-developing 2:6-5:6 year-old Farsi-speaking children in Iran. Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Science8(5): 1–10.
23.
KimY.Tracy-VenturaN.JungY. (2016) A measure of proficiency or short-term memory? Validation of an elicited imitation test for SLA research. The Modern Language Journal100(3): 655–673. doi: 10.1111/modl.12346.
24.
KlemM.Melby-LervagM.HagtvetB.LysterS. H.GustafssonJ.HulmeC. (2015) Sentence repetition is a measure of children’s language skills rather than working memory limitations. Developmental Science18(1): 146–154. doi: 10.1111/desc.12202.
25.
LombardiL.PotterM. C. (1992) The regeneration of syntax in short term memory. Journal of Memory and Language31(6): 713–733. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90036-W.
26.
MarkmanB. R.SpilkaI. V.TuckerG. R. (1975) The use of elicited imitation in search of an interim French grammar. Language Learning25: 31–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1975.tb00107.x.
27.
McDadeH. L.SimpsonM. A.LambD. E. (1982) The use of elicited imitation as a measure of expressive grammar: A question of validity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders47: 19–24. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4701.19.
28.
McNamaraT. (1996) Measuring second language performance, London, England: Longman.
29.
MehraniM. B. (2011) What is biased: Children’s strategies or the structure of yes/no questions?First Language31: 214–231. doi: 10.1177/0142723710391886.
30.
Mehrani, M. B., & Peterson, C. (2017). Children's recency tendency: A cross-linguistic study of Persian, Kurdish and English. First Language, 37, 350–367. doi: 10.1177/0142723717694055.
31.
MillerG. A. (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review63(2): 81–97. doi: 10.1037/h0043158.
32.
MollK.HulmeC.NagS.SnowlingM. J. (2015) Sentence repetition as a marker of language skills in children with dyslexia. Applied Psycholinguistics36(2): 203–221. doi: 10.1017/S0142716413000209.
33.
MunnichE.FlynnS.MartohardjonoG. (1994) Elicited imitation and grammaticality judgment tasks; what they measure and how they relate to each other. In: TaroneE. E.GassS.CohenA. (eds) Research methodology in second-language acquisition, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 227–243.
34.
Ortega, L., Iwashita, N., Norris, J. M., & Rabie, S. (2002, October). An investigation of elicited imitation tasks in cross-linguistic SLA research. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Toronto, Canada.
35.
OwensR. E. (2016) Language development: An introduction, 9th ed. New York, NY: Pearson.
36.
PolisenskaK.ChiatS.RoyP. (2015) Sentence repetition: What does the task measure?International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders50(1): 106–118. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12126.
37.
PotterM.LombardiL. (1990) Regeneration in the short term recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language29: 633–654. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90042-X.
38.
SachsJ. (1967) Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics2: 437–442. doi: 10.3758/BF03208784.
39.
SchweickertR.BoruffB. (1986) Short–term memory capacity: Magic number or magic spell?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition12(3): 419–425. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.12.3.419.
40.
ScottM. L. (1994) Auditory memory and perception in younger and older adult second language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition16(3): 263–281. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100013085.
41.
SimonH. A. (1974) How big is a chunk?Science183: 482–488. doi: 10.1126/science.183.4124.482.
42.
Slobin, D. I., & Welsh, C. A. (1968). Elicited imitation as a research tool in developmental psycholinguistics (Working Paper No 10, pp. 485–497). Berkeley: Language Behavior Research Laboratory, University of California. (Reprinted in C. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.). (1973). Studies of child language development (pp. 485–489). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.).
43.
Tracy-VenturaN.McManusK.NorrisJ.OrtegaL. (2014) “Repeat as much as you can”: Elicited imitation as a measure of oral proficiency in L2 French. In: LeclercqP.EdmondsA.HiltonH. (eds) Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA, Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters, pp. 143–166.
44.
VintherT. (2002) Elicited imitation: A brief overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics12: 54–73. doi: 10.1111/1473-4192.00024.
45.
WuS. L.OrtegaL. (2013) Measuring global oral proficiency in SLA research: A new elicited imitation test of L2 Chinese. Foreign Language Annals46: 680–704. doi: 10.1111/flan.12063.
46.
YanX.MaedaY.LvJ.GintherA. (2016) Elicited imitation as a measure of second language proficiency: A narrative review and meta-analysis. Language Testing33(4): 497–528. doi:10.1177/0265532215594643.
