The authors examined their previously published studies of transgenerational authenticity in a Japanese cohort (Ito, Horikoshi, & Kodama). In the previous paper, the authors addressed semantic and semiotic concerns. In this paper, design flaws and statistical flaws are examined.
CohenJ. (1977) Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Academic Press.
2.
Fukunishi, I. (1991) The assessment of cutoff point of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) in the Japanese version. Clinical Psychology, 3, 228–234.
3.
GianniniA. J. (2010) Semiotic and semantic implications of “authenticity.”. Psychological Reports106: 611–612.
4.
GoldbergD. P.BlackwellB. (1970) Psychiatric illness in general practice. A detailed study using a new method of case identification. British Medical Journal2(5707): 439–433.
5.
ItoM.HorikoshiM.KodamaM. (2009) A cross-sectional survey of age and sense of authenticity among Japanese. Psychological Reports105: 575–581.
6.
ItoM.HorikoshiM.KodamaM. (2011) Subjectivity and environmental influence in relation to sense of authenticity. Psychological Reports108: 763–765.
7.
ItoM.KodamaM. (2007) Sense of authenticity, affectivity, and cultural of the self among Japanese University students. Psychological Reports100: 83–86.
8.
KingstonJ. (2011) Contemporary Japan: History, politics, and social change since the 1980s, New York, NY: Wiley Blackwell.
