This study investigates restorative justice's role in reintegrating incarcerated individuals in Icelandic prisons. Employing a quantitative approach, it analyses survey data from inmates across Iceland to assess restorative justice's potential in reducing recidivism, enhancing offender accountability, and supporting community reintegration. Regression modeling reveals a partly significant link between participation in restorative justice programs and positive reintegration outcomes. Results suggest that restorative justice may enhance offender empathy, improve victim-offender relationships, and bolster support networks post-release, albeit with constraints. The research recommends expanding these programs in Icelandic correctional settings, offering insights for policymakers, prison administrators, and criminologists pursuing evidence-based restorative and rehabilitative justice strategies.
AntonsdóttirH. F. (2023). Beyond restorative justice: Survivors’ calls for innovative practices in Iceland. In Re-imagining sexual harassment. Policy Press.
2.
BaumerE.WrightR.KristinsdóttirK.GunnlaugssonH. (2002). Crime, shame and reintegration: The case of Iceland. British Journal of Criminology, 43(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/43.1.40
3.
Bibler-CoutinS. (2005). Qualitative research in law and social sciences. In LamontM.WhiteP. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary standards for systemic qualitative research (pp. 60–75). National Science Foundation.
4.
BraithwaiteJ. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
5.
BraithwaiteJ. (1999). A future where punishment is marginalized: Realistic or utopian?UCLA Law Review, 46(6), 1727–1750.
ChristieN. (1993). Crime control as industry: Towards gulags, western style. Routledge.
8.
CreswellJ. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publishing.
9.
DalyK. (2013). The punishment debate in restorative justice. In SimonJ.SparksR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of punishment and society (pp. 356–374). Sage.
DuffR. A. (2002). Restorative punishment and punitive restoration. In WalgraveL. (Ed.), Restorative justice and the law (pp. 82–100). Willan Publishing.
12.
DurrenbergerP. (1996). Every Icelander a special case. In PálssonG.DurrenbergerP. (Eds.), Images of contemporary Iceland (pp. 171–190). University of Iowa Press.
13.
GadeC. B. N. (2021). Is restorative justice punishment?Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 38(3), 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21312
HalmanL.RiisO. (1999). Contemporary European discourse on religion and morality. In HalmanL. (Ed.), Religion in secularizing society (pp. 1–18). Tilburg University Press.
MarshallT. F. (1996). The evolution of restorative justice in Britain. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 4(4), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02736709
21.
NeumanW. L. (1994). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Allyn and Bacon.
22.
NylundA.ErvastiK.AdrianL. (2018). Introduction to Nordic mediation research. In NylundA.ErvastiK.AdrianL. (Eds.), Nordic mediation research (pp. 67–79). Springer.
23.
ÓlafsdóttirH.BragadóttirR. (2006). Crime and criminal policy in Iceland: Criminology on the margins of Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 4(3), 221–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370806065582
24.
PakesF.GunnlaugssonH. (2018). A more Nordic Norway? Examining prisons in 21st century Iceland. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 57(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12258
25.
PrattJ. (2008a). Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess: Part I: The nature and roots of Scandinavian exceptionalism. British Journal of Criminology, 48(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azm073
26.
PrattJ. (2008b). Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess: Part II: Does Scandinavian exceptionalism have a future?British Journal of Criminology, 48(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azm074
27.
PresserS.RothgebJ. M.CouperM.LesslerJ. T.MartinE.MartinJ.SingerE. (2004). Methods of testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. Wiley Publishing.
28.
PunchK. F. (1998). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage Publishing.
29.
ReaL. M.ParkerR. A. (1992). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
30.
SalantP.DillmanD. A. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. Wiley Publishing.
31.
StamatakisN. (2021). “Is restorative justice Greek to me?”: Exploring its applicability in Greek youth detention centres. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 29, 264–289. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-29030001
32.
StamatakisN.VandeviverC. (2012). Restorative justice in Belgian prisons: The results of an empirical research. Crime, Law and Social Change, 59, 79–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-012-9397-7
33.
UmbreitM.VosB.CoatesR.LightfootE. (2005). Restorative justice in the twenty-first century: A social movement full of opportunities and pitfalls. Marquette Law Review, 89, 251–304.
34.
WalgraveL. (2008). Restorative justice, self-interest and responsible citizenship. Willan Publishing.
35.
ZehrH. (1990). Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice. Herald Press.
36.
ZehrH. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.
