Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article presents findings from a process evaluation of the Pennsylvania Prison Society's Building Connection reentry workshops for incarcerated men nearing parole. Using interviews with formerly incarcerated program participants, surveys of currently incarcerated participants, observations of program workshops, and program documents, the study highlights key features that support participants’ emotional and practical preparation for reentry, including relatable facilitators, real-world scenarios, and a safe group setting. The program fosters communication skills, emotional support, and awareness of community resources. Implications for program expansion or replication are also discussed.

Keywords

reentry mentoring corrections qualitative evaluation emotional support

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bauldry

Korom-Djakovic

Kotloff

McClanahan

W. S.

McMaken

(2009). Mentoring formerly incarcerated adults: Insights from the Ready4Work Reentry Initiative. Public/Private Ventures.

Belenko

Peugh

(2005). Estimating drug treatment needs among state prison inmates. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 77(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.08.023

Braga

A. A.

Piehl

A. M.

Hureau

(2009). Controlling violent offenders released to the community: An evaluation of the Boston Reentry Initiative. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46(4), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427809341935

Brown

Ross

(2010). Mentoring, social capital and desistance: A study of women released from prison. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.43.1.31

Clark

V. A.

(2015). Making the most of second chances: An evaluation of Minnesota’s high-risk revocation reduction reentry program. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9216-5

Cobbs Fletcher

Sherk

Jucovy

(2009). Mentoring former prisoners: A guide for reentry programs. Public/Private Ventures.

Duwe

Clark

V. A.

(2013). Blessed be the ties that bind: The effects of prison visitation on offender recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403411429724

Duwe

Johnson

B. R.

(2016). The effects of prison visits from community volunteers on offender recidivism. The Prison Journal, 96(2), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885515618468

Fletcher

D. R.

Batty

(2012). Offender peer interventions: What do we know? Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research.

10.

Garcia

(2016). The importance of the mentor–mentee relationship in women’s desistance from destructive behaviors. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(7), 808–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14568257

11.

Grattet

Lin

(2016). Supervision intensity and parole outcomes: A competing risks approach to criminal and technical parole violations. Justice Quarterly, 33(4), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2014.932001

12.

Hamilton

Belenko

(2019). Substance use disorder treatment in the reentry environment: Service receipt and prisoner community reintegration. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 46(9), 1295–1318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819846528

13.

Harding

D. J.

Morenoff

J. D.

Nguyen

A. P.

Bushway

S. D.

(2018). Imprisonment and labor market outcomes. American Journal of Sociology, 124(1), 49–110. https://doi.org/10.1086/697507

14.

Kavanagh

Borril

(2013). Exploring the experiences of ex-offender mentors. Probation Journal, 60(4), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550513502247

15.

Koschmann

M. A.

Peterson

B. L.

(2013). Rethinking recidivism. Journal of Applied Social Science, 7(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1936724412467021

16.

La Vigne

N. G.

Shollenburger

T. L.

Debus

S. A.

(2009). One year out: Tracking the experiences of male prisoners returning to Houston. Urban Institute.

17.

Lynch

Astone

N. M.

Collazos

Lipman

Esthappan

(2018). Arches transformative mentoring program: An implementation and impact evaluation in New York City. Urban Institute.

18.

Mallik-Kane

Visher

C. A.

(2008). Health and prisoner reentry. Urban Institute.

19.

Marlow

Grajeda

Lee

Young

Williams

Hill

(2015). Peer mentoring for male parolees: A CBPR pilot study. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 9(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2015.0013

20.

Maruna

LeBel

(2003). Welcome home? Examining the reentry court concept from a strengths-based perspective. Western Criminology Review, 4(2), 91–107. https://westerncriminology.org/documents/WCR/v04n2/article_pdfs/marunalebel.pdf

21.

Metraux

Roman

C. G.

Cho

(2008). Incarceration and homelessness. In Dennis

Locke

Khadduri

(Eds.), Toward understanding homelessness (pp. 9.1–9.31). US Department of Housing and Urban Development.

22.

Naser

R. L.

La Vigne

N. G.

(2006). Family support in the prisoner reentry process: Expectations and realities. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v43n01_05

23.

Pager

(2008). Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. The University of Chicago Press.

24.

Prendergast

M. L.

(2009). Interventions to promote successful re-entry among drug-abusing parolees. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 5(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1151/ascp09514

25.

Pulitzer

Box

Hansen

Tiruneh

Y. M.

Nijhawan

A. K.

(2021). Patient, medical and legal perspectives on reentry: The need for a low-barrier, collaborative, patient-centered approach. Health & Justice, 9(37), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-021-00161-7

26.

Roberts

M. R.

Stacer

M. J.

(2016). In their own words: Offenders’ perspectives on their participation in a faith-based diversion and reentry program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 55(7), 466–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2016.1216914

27.

Rudes

D. S.

(2012). Getting technical: Parole officers’ continued use of technical violations under California’s parole reform agenda. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.677572

28.

Schenwar

Law

(2020). Prison by any other name: The harmful consequences of popular reforms. The New Press.

29.

Seiter

R. P.

Kadela

K. R.

(2003). Prisoner reentry: What works, what does not, and what is promising. Crime and Delinquency, 49(3), 360–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128703049003002

30.

Serin

R. C.

Lloyd

C. D.

Hanby

L. J.

(2010). Enhancing offender reentry: An integrated model for enhancing offender re-entry. European Journal of Probation, 2(2), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/206622031000200205

31.

Taylor

C. J.

(2016). The family’s role in the reintegration of formerly incarcerated individuals: The direct effects of emotional support. The Prison Journal, 96(3), 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885516635085

32.

Taylor

C. J.

(2020). Mentee and mentor perceptions of a mentoring court for high-risk probationers. Probation Journal, 67(3), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550520939174

33.

Taylor

C. J.

(2023). Does mentoring work with moderate- and high-risk young adult probationers?: The implementation and outcomes of an adult mentoring court. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(3), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09670-z

34.

Umez

De la Cruz

Richey

Albis

(2017). Mentoring as a component of reentry: Practical considerations from the field. The Council of State Governments Justice Center.

35.

Visher

C. A.

Lattimore

P. K.

(2007). Major study examines prisoners and their reentry needs. NIJ Journal, 258, 30–33. https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/major-study-examines-prisoners-and-their-reentry-needs

36.

Walker

Bowen

(2015). Mentoring serial and high-risk perpetrators of intimate partner violence in the community: Engagement and initiating change. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 25(4), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1964

37.

Western

(2018). Homeward: Life in the year after prison. Russell Sage Foundation.

Building Connection Behind Bars: A Process Evaluation of a Relationship-Based Reentry Workshop for Incarcerated Men in Pennsylvania

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References