Recent years have seen increasing concerns about the importance of offender reentry and how to best facilitate ex-offenders remaining crimefree. Common responses have been to enhance punitiveness, and to decrease resources and support services for ex-offenders. Results have been consistently high levels of recidivism, and consequently increasingly punitive responses. The present study examines whether a cohort of offenders released to the community in Kentucky either under parole supervision or at the expiration of their sentences are more likely to be reincarcerated within a 5-year period. The participants of each cohort were constructed into two groups using propensity score matching to control for differences between them.
AustinJ.HardymanP. L. (2004). The risk and needs of the returning prison population. Review of Policy Research, 21, 13-29.
2.
BaerD.BhatiA.BrooksL.CastroJ.LaVingeN.Mallik-Kane…WinterfieldL. (2006). Understanding the challenges of prisoner reentry: Research findings from the urban institute’s prisoner reentry portfolio. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
3.
BeckA. J.ShipleyB. E. (1989). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1983. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
4.
BucklenK. B.ZajacG. (2009). But some don’t come back (to prison)! Resource deprivation and thinking errors as determinants of parole success and failure. The Prison Journal, 89, 239-264.
5.
DiamondA.SekhonJ. S. (2013). Genetic matching for estimating causal effects: A general multivariate matching method for achieving balance in observational studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 932-945.
6.
GendreauP.LittleT.GogginC. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 575-607.
7.
GlazeL. E.BonczarT. P. (2006). Probation and parole in the United States, 2005. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
8.
GlazeL. E.BonczarT. P. (2008). Probation and parole in the United States, 2007. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
9.
GlazeL. E.BonczarT. P. (2009). Probation and parole in the United States, 2008. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
10.
GrattetR.PetersiliaJ.LinJ. (2008). Parole violations and revocations in California. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
11.
HeckmanJ. J.IchimuraH.ToddP. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64, 605-654.
12.
HerbermanE. J.BonczarT. P. (2015). Probation and parole in the United States, 2013. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
13.
IrelandC. S.PrauseJ. (2005). Discretionary parole release: Length of imprisonment, percent of sentence served and recidivism. Journal of Crime & Justice, 28, 27-49.
14.
Justice Policy Institute. (2011, May). Due South: Kentucky: Overhauling the criminal justice system. Available from www.justicepolicy.org
15.
Kentucky Department of Corrections. (2003). Recidivism 1999-2000. Frankfort: Kentucky Department of Corrections.
16.
LanganP. A.LevinD. J. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
17.
ListwanS. J.CullenF. T.LatessaE. J. (2006). How to prevent prisoner re-entry programs from failing: Insights from evidence-based evaluations. Federal Probation, 70, 19-25.
18.
LowenkampC. T.LatessaE. J. (2005). Increasing the effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying offenders for residential placement*. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 263-290.
19.
LowenkampC. T.LatessaE. J.HolsingerA. M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs?Crime & Delinquency, 52, 77-93.
20.
LowenkampC. T.PealerJ.SmithP.LatessaE. J. (2006). Adhering to risk and need principles: Does it matter for supervision-based programs?Federal Probation, 70, 3-8.
21.
MarbleyA. F.FergusonR. (2005). Responding to prisoner reentry, recidivism and incarceration of inmates of color: A call to communities. Journal of Black Studies, 35, 633-649.
22.
MartinsonR. M.WilksJ. M. (1977). Save parole supervision. Federal Probation, 42, 23-27.
23.
MearsD. P.WangX.HayC.BalesW. D. (2008). Social ecology and recidivism: Implications for prisoner reentry. Criminology, 46, 301-340.
24.
OstermannM. (2011). Parole? Nope, not for me: Voluntarily maxing out of prison. Crime & Delinquency, 57, 686-702.
25.
OstermannM. (2012). Recidivism and the propensity to forego parole release. Justice Quarterly, 29, 596-618.
26.
OstermannM. (2013). Active supervision and its impact upon parolee recidivism rates. Crime & Delinquency, 59, 487-509.
27.
OstermannM. (2015). How do former inmates perform in the community? A survival analysis of rearrests, reconvictions, and technical parole violations. Crime & Delinquency, 61, 163-187.
28.
OstermannM.CaplanJ. M. (2013). How much do the crimes committed by released inmates cost?Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0011128713505482
29.
OstermannM.HyattJ. M. (2014). Is something better than nothing? The effect of short terms of mandatory parole supervision. Justice Quarterly, 1-26. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.980300
30.
PetersiliaJ. (2001). Prisoner reentry: Public safety and reintegration challenges. The Prison Journal, 81, 360-375.
31.
PetersiliaJ. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner re-entry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
Pew Center on States. (2011). State of recidivism: The revolving door of America’s prisons. Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts.
33.
RichardsS. C.AustinJ.JonesR. S. (2004a). Kentucky’s perpetual prison machine: It’s about money. Review of Policy Research, 21, 93-106.
34.
RichardsS. C.AustinJ.JonesR. S. (2004b). Thinking about prison release and budget crisis in the blue grass state. Critical Criminology, 12, 243-263.
35.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
36.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1985). The bias due to incomplete matching. Biometrics, 41, 103-116.
37.
SchlagerM. D.RobbinsK. (2008). Does parole work?—Revisited: Reframing the discussion of the impact of postprison supervision on offender outcome. The Prison Journal, 88, 234-251.
38.
SeversonM. E.BrunsK.VeehC.LeeJ. (2011). Prisoner reentry programming: Who recidivates and when?Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(6), 327-348.
39.
SolomonA. L. (2006). Does parole supervision work? Research findings and policy opportunities. In American Probation and Parole Association Perspectives (pp. 26-37).
40.
SolomonA. L.KachnowskiV.BhatiA. (2005). Does parole work? Analyzing the impact of postprison supervision on rearrest outcomes. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
41.
SteenS.OpsalT.LovegroveP.McKinzeyS. (2012). Putting parolees back in prison: Discretion and the parole revocation process. Criminal Justice Review, 38, 70-93.
42.
TaxmanF. (2002). Supervision—Exploring the dimensions of effectiveness. Federal Probation, 66, 14-27.
43.
TravisJ. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the problems of prisoner re-entry. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
44.
TravisL. W.StaceyJ. (2008). A half century of parole rules: Conditions of parole in the United States, 2008. Journal of Criminal Justice, 4, 604-608.
45.
VitoG. F.SchuttJ. E.TewksburyR. (2009). Estimating the impact of Kentucky’s felon disenfranchisement policy on 2008 presidential and senatorial elections. Federal Probation, 73, 28-32.
46.
VitoG. F.TewksburyR.HigginsG. E. (2010). Evaluation of Kentucky’s early release initiative: Sentence commutations, public safety and recidivism. Federal Probation, 74, 22-26.
47.
VitoG. F.WilsonD. G.HolmesS. T. (1993). Drug testing in community corrections: Results from a four -year program. The Prison Journal, 73, 343-354.
48.
WhiteM. D.SaundersJ.FisherC.MellowJ. (2008). Exploring inmate reentry in a local jail setting: Implications for outreach, service use, and recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 58, 124-146. doi:10.1177/0011128708327033
49.
WilsonJ. A. (2005). Bad behavior or bad policy? An examination of Tennessee release cohorts, 1993-2001. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 485-518.
50.
WodahlE. J. (2006). The challenges of prisoner reentry from a rural perspective. Western Criminology Review, 7, 32-47.
51.
WrightK. A.PrattT. C.LowenkampC. T.LatessaE. J. (2012). The importance of ecological context for correctional rehabilitation programs: Understanding the micro-and macro-level dimensions of successful offender treatment. Justice Quarterly, 29, 775-798.
52.
ZhangS. X.RobertsR. E.CallananV. J. (2006). Preventing parolees from returning to prison through community-based reintegration. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 551-571.
