Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article examines the mechanisms underlying “turning point” processes among participants in Prison Dog Programs (PDPs). Despite the coercive and violent elements that characterize prisons, there may still be space for positive transitions. While most opportunities for personal growth in prison are limited, or truncated, PDPs are unique. They demand immersive investment through which strong bonds develop between human and dog. Based on in-depth interviews with formerly incarcerated men, this article examines how the meaningful relationships they built with the dogs while in a PDP facilitated inner change, playing a major role in their turning point processes.

Keywords

reentry prison dog programs turning point desistance rehabilitation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Auty

Liebling

(2020). Exploring the relationship between prison social climate and reoffending. Justice Quarterly, 37(2), 358–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1538421

Bachi

(2013). Application of attachment theory to equine-facilitated psychotherapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 43(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-013-9232-1

Cooke

Farrington

(2014). Perceived effects of dog-training programs in correctional settings. Journal of Forensic Practice, 16(3), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-08-2013-0041

Cooke

Farrington

(2016). The effectiveness of dog-training programs in prison: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. The Prison Journal, 96(6), 854–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885516671919

Crewe

Ievins

(2020). The prison as a reinventive institution. Theoretical Criminology, 24(4), 568–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480619841900

Duindam

H. M.

Asscher

J. J.

Hoeve

Stams

G. J.

Creemers

H. E.

(2020). Are we barking up the right tree? A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of prison-based dog programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(6), 749–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820909875

Durose

M. R.

Antenangeli

(2021). Recidivism of prisoners released in 34 states in 2012: A five-year follow-up period (2012-2017). Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh236/files/media/document/rpr34s125yfup1217.pdf

Esterberg

K. G.

(2002). Qualitative methods in social research. McGraw Hill.

Farrall

Hunter

Sharpe

Calverley

(2014). Criminal careers in transition: The social context of desistance from crime. Oxford University.

10.

Flynn

Massey Combs

Gandenberger

Tedeschi

Morris

K. N.

(2020). Measuring the psychological impacts of prison-based dog training programs and in-prison outcomes for inmates. The Prison Journal, 100(2), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885519894657

11.

Fournier

A. K.

(2016). Pen pals: An examination of human–animal interaction as an outlet for healthy masculinity in prison. In Blazina

Kogan

(Eds.), Men and their dogs (pp. 175–194). Springer International.

12.

Furst

(2011). Animal programs in prison: A comprehensive assessment. First Forum.

13.

Furst

(2019). The empirical evidence supporting dog training programs for incarcerated people. In Jalongo

M. R.

(Ed.), Prison dog programs: Renewal and rehabilitation in correctional facilities (pp. 17–36). Springer.

14.

Glaser

Strauss

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Sociology Press.

15.

Grommon

Carson

Kenney

(2020). An experimental trial of a dog-training program in a juvenile detention center. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 16(8), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9346-2

16.

Han

Flynn

Pena

Morris

K. N.

(2023). Measuring the impact of prison-based dog training programs on recidivism: A propensity score-matched survival analysis. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/727360

17.

Han

T. M.

Flynn

Winchell

Gould

Gandenberger

Barattin

Tedeschi

Morris

K. N.

(2019). Standard protocol: Prison-based dog training programs. Wellbeing International Animal Studies Repository—Animal Training and Obedience Collection. https://animalstudiesrepository.org/anitobe/2/

18.

Hoskins

K. M.

Cobbina

(2020). It depends on the situation: Women’s identity transformation in prison, jail, and substance abuse treatment settings. Feminist Criminology, 15(3), 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085119878268

19.

Humby

Barclay

(2018). Pawsitive solutions: An overview of prison dog programs in Australia. The Prison Journal, 98(5), 580–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885518793951

20.

Kazemian

(2020). Positive growth and redemption in prison: Finding light behind bars and beyond. Routledge.

21.

LeBel

T. P.

Burnett

Maruna

Bushway

(2008). The “chicken and egg” of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370807087640

22.

Leonardi

R. J.

Buchanan-Smith

H. M.

McIvor

Vick

S. J.

(2017). “You think you're helping them, but they're helping you too”: Experiences of Scottish male young offenders participating in a dog training program. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(8), 945–972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080945

23.

Liebling

Laws

Lieber

Auty

Schmidt

B. E.

Crewe

Gardom

Kant

Morey

(2019). Are hope and possibility achievable in prison? The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 58(1), 104–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12303

24.

Maier

Ricciardelli

(2022). “Prison didn’t change me, I have changed”: Narratives of change, self, and prison time. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 22(5), 774–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958211031336

25.

Maruna

(2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. American Psychological Association.

26.

Maruna

Wilson

Curran

(2006). Why God is often found behind bars: Prison conversions and the crisis of self-narrative. Research in Human Development, 3(2-3), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427617rhd0302&3_6

27.

McGuinn

S. C.

(2018). Reentry, resistance, and the responsibility of the state: Let them back in. Emerald Publishing Limited.

28.

Mercer

Gibson

Clayton

(2015). The therapeutic potential of a prison-based animal program in the UK. Journal of Forensic Practice, 17(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-09-2014-0031

29.

Mowen

T. J.

Boman

J. H.

(2019). Do we have it all wrong? The protective roles of peers and criminogenic risks from family during prison reentry. Crime and Delinquency, 65(5), 681–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128718800286

30.

Paternoster

Bushway

(2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(4), 1103–1156. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol99/iss4/5

31.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(2005). A life-course view of the development of crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602(1), 12–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205280075

32.

Sandelowski

Barroso

(2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer.

33.

Serpell

J. A.

(2000). Creatures of the unconscious: Companion animals as mediators. In Podberscek

A. L.

Paul

E. S.

Serpell

J. A.

(Eds.), Companion animals and us: Exploring the relationships between people and pets (pp. 108–121). Cambridge University Press.

34.

Smith

H. P.

(2019). A rescue dog program in two maximum-security prisons: A qualitative study. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 58(4), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2019.1596189

35.

Soyer

(2014). The imagination of desistance: A juxtaposition of the construction of incarceration as a turning point and the reality of recidivism. British Journal of Criminology, 54(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azt059

36.

Stoll

(2024). “Disincarcerating incarcerated emotions”: The influence of emotional dynamics behind and beyond bars on desistance from crime. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 24(3), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221133460

37.

Ugelvik

(2022). The transformative power of trust: Exploring tertiary desistance in reinventive prisons. The British Journal of Criminology, 62(3), 623–638. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azab076

38.

Van Wormer

Kigerl

Hamilton

(2017). Digging deeper: Exploring the value of prison-based dog handler programs. The Prison Journal, 97(4), 520–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885517712481

39.

Walters

G. D.

(2020). Desisting from crime: In-prison behavior and cognition as predictors of post-release success. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 62(3), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2019-0068

40.

Wesely

J. K.

(2019). When gender goes to the dogs: Perceptions of masculinity and identity change among male participants in a prison-based animal program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 58(8), 696–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2019.1648354

41.

Wesely

J. K.

Furst

Bello

Morris

(2024). How prison dog programs challenge the racial code in correctional settings and beyond. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research, 10(2), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2024.2338848

42.

Widdowson

A. O.

Siennick

S. E.

(2021). The effects of residential mobility on criminal persistence and desistance during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(2), 151–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427820948578

“The Dogs Saved My Life”: The Role of Prison Dog Programs in the Turning Point Process Among Formerly Incarcerated Men

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References