A survey of animal welfare agencies and corrections departments across Australia was conducted to compile a nationwide profile of prison dog programs, wherein inmates train dogs while learning skills to assist their rehabilitation. Most programs operating in 23 prisons in six Australian states were a community service design administered by animal welfare organizations. Inmates benefit through opportunities to train the dogs, give back to society, gain a sense of responsibility, improve self-confidence and social skills, and acquire vocational qualifications to improve job opportunities postrelease. Barriers identified included insufficient funding, limited training opportunities for the dogs, and some staff resistance.
BeckA. M.KatcherA. H. (1996). Between pets and people: The importance of animal companionship. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
5.
BrittonD. M.ButtonA. L. (2005). Prison pups: Assessing the effects of dog training programs in correctional facilities. Journal of Family Social Work, 9, 79-95.
6.
BrittonD. M.ButtonA. L. (2007). This isn’t about us: Benefits of dog training programs in a women’s prison. In MillerS. L. (Ed.), Criminal Justice Research and Practice: Diverse Voices from the Field (pp. 195-209). Boston, Massachusetts: Northeastern University Press.
7.
ChianeseN. M. (2010). Girls, jails, and puppy dog tails: An evaluation of the New Leash on Life Program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Fullerton: California State University.
8.
ClemmerD. (1940). The prison community. Boston, MA: Christopher Publishing House.
9.
CookeB. J.FarringtonD. P. (2014). Perceived effects of dog-training programmes in correctional settings. Journal of Forensic Practice, 16, 171-183.
10.
CunneenC.BaldryE.BrownD.BrownM.SchwartzM.SteelA. (2013). Hyperincarceration and penal culture: The revival of the prison. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
DennisonP. (2005). Complete idiot’s guide to positive dog training. New York, NY: Alpha.
13.
DieselG.PfeifferD. U.BrodbelD. (2008). Factors affecting the success of rehoming dogs in the UK during 2005. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 84, 228-241.
14.
FisherB. J.CozensM. (2014). The BaRK (Building Reading Confidence for Kids) canine assisted reading program: One child’s experience. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 22(1), 70.
15.
FournierA. K.GellerE. S.FortneyE. V. (2007). Human-animal interaction in a prison setting: Impact on criminal behavior, treatment progress, and social skills. Behavior and Social Issues, 16, 89-105.
16.
FurstG. (2006). Prison-based animal programs: A national survey. The Prison Journal, 86, 407-430.
17.
FurstG. (2007a). Prison-based animal programs: Self-reported effect of participation and implications for desistance. Prison Service Journal, 172, 38-44.
18.
FurstG. (2007b). Without words to get in the way: Symbolic interaction in prison-based animal programs. Qualitative Sociology Review, 3, 96-109.
19.
HaneyC. (2006). The wages of prison overcrowding: Harmful psychological consequences and dysfunctional correctional reactions. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 22, 265-293.
20.
HaneyC.BanksC.ZimbardoP. G. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology & Penology, 1, 69-97.
21.
HarkraderT.BurkeT. W.OwenS. S. (2004). Pound puppies: The rehabilitative uses of dogs in correctional facilities. Corrections Today, 66, 74-80.
22.
HennessyM. B.MorrisA.LindenF. (2006). Evaluation of the effects of a socialization program in a prison on behavior and pituitary–adrenal hormone levels of shelter dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 99, 157-171.
23.
KatcherA. H.BeckA. M.LevineD. (1989). Evaluation of a pet program in prison: The PAL project at Lorton. Antrhozoos, 2, 175-180.
24.
LeedsR. (1963). Altruism and the norm of giving. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 9, 229-260.
25.
MarstonL.BennettP. C. (2003). Reforming the bond - Towards sucessful canine adoption. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 83, 227-245.
26.
McNicholasJ.CollisG. M. (2000). Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 61-70.
27.
MercerJ.GibsonK.ClaytonD. (2015). The therapeutic potential of a prison-based animal programme in the UK. Journal of Forensic Practice, 17, 43-54.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldanaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
30.
MoneymakerJ. M.StrimpleE. O. (1991). Animals and inmates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 16, 133-152.
31.
MoreyD. F. (2006). Burying key evidence: The social bond between dogs and people. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 158-175.
32.
MulcahyC. (2011). Companions on the inside: Pet ownership and the introduction of a prison dog program at Darling Downs Correctional Centre (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland). Retrieved from http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:262536
PorporinoF. J. (1990). Differences in response to long-term imprisonment: Implications for the management of long-term offenders. The Prison Journal, 70, 35-45.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1994). Grounded Theory methodology: An overview, In DenzinN. K.LincolnY.S., (Eds): Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 1-18). London: Sage.
37.
StrimpleE. O. (2003). A history of prison inmate-animal interaction programs. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 70-78.
38.
TurnerW. G. (2007). Experiences of offenders in a prison canine program. Federal Probation, 71, 38-43.
WalshP. G.MertinP. G. (1994). The training of pets as therapy dogs in a women’s prison: A pilot study. Anthrozoos, 7, 124-128.
41.
WellsD. L. (2007). Domestic dogs and human health: An overview. British Journal of Health Psychology, 12, 145-156.
42.
WellsD. L.GrahamL.HepperP. G. (2002). The influence of length of time in a rescue shelter on the behaviour of kennelled dogs. Animal Welfare, 11, 317-325.
