365 Days > 366 Days: The (in)Ability to Earn Good Time Credit During the Time of COVID-19

Abstract

Federal offenders sentenced to imprisonment for more than a year may earn “good time credit”. Offenders sentenced to 365 days are ineligible for this potential sentence reduction of up to 54 days a year. Using 2020 through 2022 data from the United States Sentencing Commission, we identified 3,765 federal offenders sentenced to either 365- or 366-days’ imprisonment. Independent variables included offender, legal, and case characteristics. Integrating the COVID-19 pandemic, we reviewed the percentage of compassionate release motions granted at the district level. A hierarchical logistic regression with random effects illustrated several measures connected to the ability to earn goodtime credit.

Keywords

good time credit credit for service imprisonment federal sentences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

18 U.S.C§ 3582(c)(1)(A). Imposition of a Sentence of Imprisonment: Modification of an Imposed Term of Imprisonment .

18 U.S.C. § 3624(b)(1). Release of a Prisoner: Credit Toward Service of Sentence for Satisfactory Behavior .

28 U.S.C. §994(w). Duties of the Commission .

Ali

Khan

S. A.

Khan

D. M.

Abbas

Khalil

Manzoor

Khalil

(2019). Sample size issues in multilevel logistic regression models. PLoS ONE, 14(11), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225427

Franklin

T. W.

Dittmann

Henry

T. K. S.

(2017). Extralegal disparity in the application of intermediate sanctions: An analysis of US district courts. Crime & Delinquency, 63(7), 839–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128715607533

Franklin

T. W.

Henry

T. K. S.

(2018). One day makes all the difference: Denying federal offenders access to “good time” through sentencing. Crime & Delinquency, 64(1), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716682227

Holmes

Feldmeyer

(Online First). The only things constant is change: Temporal analyses of racial/ethnic sentencing disparities. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-023-09725-9

Larkin

P. J.

(2014). Managing prisons by the numbers: Using the good time laws and risk-needs assessments to manage the federal prison population. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 1(1), 1–29.

McNeish

D. M.

Stapleton

L. M.

(2016). The effect of small sample size on two-level model estimates: A review and illustration. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9287-x

10.

Moineddin

Matheson

F. I.

Glazier

R. H.

(2007). A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models. BMC medical Research Methodology, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-34

11.

Nowotny

K. M.

Bailey

Brinkley-Rubinstein

(2021). The contribution of prisons and jails to U.S. racial disparities during COVID-19. American Journal of Public Health, 111(2), 197–199. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.306040

12.

Petersilia

Cullen

F. T.

(2015). Liberal but not stupid: Meeting the promise of downsizing prisons. Stanford Journal of Criminal Law and Policy, 2(1), 1–44. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2458024

13.

Piquero

A. R.

(2021). The policy lessons learned from the criminal justice system response to COVID-19. Criminology & Public Policy, 20(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12562

14.

Polinsky

A. M.

(2015). Deterrence and the optimality of rewarding prisoners for good behavior. International Review of Law and Economics, 44, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2015.04.004

15.

Salonger

Parish

Ward

J. A.

Di Laura

Dolovich

(2020). COVID-19 cases and deaths in federal and state prisons. Journal of the American Medical Association, 324(6), 602–603. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.12528

16.

Schmitt

G. R.

Reedt

Blackwell

(2017). Demographic Differences in Sentencing: An Update to the 2012 Booker Report. United States Sentencing Commission.

17.

Schoeneberger

J. A.

(2016). The impact of sample size and other factors when estimating multilevel logistic models. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(2), 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1027805

18.

Simpson

P. L.

Butler

T. G.

(2020). COVID-19, prison crowding and release policies. British Medical Journal, 369, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1551

19.

Ulmer

J. T.

(2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.624115

20.

United States Sentencing Commission. (2020a). Inter-District Differences in Federal Sentencing Practices: Sentencing Practices Across Districts from 2005–2017. Washington, D.C.

21.

United States Sentencing Commission. (2020b). Federal Sentencing: The Basics. Washington, D.C.

22.

United States Sentencing Commission. (2012). Report on the Continuing Impact of United States v. Booker on Federal Sentencing. Washington, D.C.

23.

United States Sentencing Commission. (2022). Compassionate Release Data Report: Fiscal Years 2020 to 2022. Washington, D.C.

24.

United States Sentencing Commission. (2023). Individual Offender Data files. Washington, D.C. https://www.ussc.gov/research/datafiles/commission-datafiles#individual.

25.

Watson

Warmbrod

K. L.

Vahey

R. A.

Cicero

Inglesby

T. V.

(2020). COVID-19 and the US Criminal Justice System: Evidence for Public Health Measures to Reduce Risk. Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.