The purpose of the study was to identify the factors that delay the granting of early release to prisoners who are eligible for early release according to the Israeli law. The study is based on participatory observations of parole board hearings, interviews with parole board members, and content analysis of protocols of parole boards and legal rulings. The main factors identified in delaying release are related to the numerous postponements of hearings and delays in receiving documents from relevant parties. These factors are discussed in detail, offering recommendation for improvement and thus increasing the number of early releases.
AmirM.DiamantA.KranotP. (2012). Employment for ex-convicts: System research – 2011. Prisoner Rehabilitation Authority. [Hebrew].
2.
Ben-YehudaZ. (2017). Aspects of the work of the parole boards. Knesset Research and Information Center. [Hebrew].
3.
Ben ZviK.WalkD. (2011). Recidivism of Israeli inmates released in 2004. Crimes and Penalties in Israel - Glimpse into Prison, 14, 10–28. [Hebrew].
4.
BermanE.WalkD. (2015). The recidivism of Israeli prisoners released in 2008. Research & Strategic Planning Department, Planning Administration, Israeli Prison Service. [Hebrew].
5.
BialerG.Peled-LaskovR. (2011). Supervision and employment – the contribution of supervision and employment to the rehabilitation of released prisoners in Israel. Glimpse into Prison – Offences and Punishments in Israel, 14, 113–131. [Hebrew]
6.
CaplanJ. (2007). What factors affect parole: A review of empirical research. Federal Probation, 71(1), 16–19.
7.
CarrollJ. S.BurkeP. A. (1990). Evaluation and predictionin expert parole decitions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(3), 315–332.
8.
ClancyA.HudsonK.MaguireM.PeakeR.RaynorP.VanstoneM.KynchJ. (2006). Getting out and staying out: Results of the prisoner resettlement pathfinders. Policy Press.
9.
CullenF. T.GendreauP. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice and prospects. Criminal Justice, 3, 109–175.
10.
DaganN. A. (2015). Respone to assy and Menashe’s “the cath-22 in Israel’s parole law”. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(8), 872–882.
11.
DaganN.TimorU.RonelN. (2013). Haw the Israeli’s parole boards chairmen perceives the justifications and purposes of the Israeli parole act, 2001. Crimes and Penalties in Israel - Glimpse into Prison, 15, 62–81. [Hebrew].
12.
DanzigerS.LevavJ.Avnaim PessoaJ. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the Natlonal Academy of Science of the United States of America, 108, 6889–6892.
13.
DiamantA. (2008). The Prisoner Rehabilitation Authority – theory and practice. In: MahalH.HovavM.GolanM. (Eds.), Addictions, violence and sex crimes – treatment according to the law (pp. 402–418). Carmel. [Hebrew].
14.
Dorner Committee Report. (2015, November) Report of the public committee to examine punishment and the treatment of offenders policy. Ministry of Justice, [Hebrew].
15.
DrakeE. K.AosS.MillerM. G. (2009). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce crime and criminal justice costs: Implications in Washington State. Victims & Offenders, 4, 170–196.
16.
DuweG.KerschnerD. (2008). Removing a nail from the boot camp coffin: An outcome evaluation of Minnesota’s challenge incarceration program. Crime and Delinquency, 54, 614–643.
17.
ElishaE.ShohamE.HasisiB.WeisburdD. (2017). For prisoners, ‘work works’: Qualitative findings from an Israeli program. The Prison Journal, 97(3), 342–363.
18.
FrankeD.BierieD.MacKenzieD. L. (2010). Legitimacy in corrections: A randomized experiment comparing a boot camp with a prison. Criminology & Public Policy, 91, 89–117.
19.
GendreauP.GogginC.CullenF. (1999). The effects of prison sentences on recidivism. Department of the Solicitor General Canada.
20.
GendreauP.LittleT.GogginC. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works?Criminology, 34(4), 575–607.
21.
GraffamJ.ShinkfieldA.LavelleB.McPhersonW. (2004). Variables affecting successful reintegration as perceived by offenders and professionals. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40(1–2), 147–171.
Hannah-MoffatK. (2004). Losing ground: Gendered knowledges, parol risk, and responsibility. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 11(3), 363–385.
24.
IPS Research Department. (2014, May). Parole data for 2004-2013. IPS Spokesperson’s Office, [Hebrew].
25.
KlingeleC. (2010). Changing the sentence without hiding the truth: Judical sentence modification as a promising method of early release. William & Mary Law Review, 52, 465–534.
26.
LewisS.MaguireM.RaynorP.VanstoneM.VennardJ. (2007). What works in resettlement? Findings from seven Pathfinders for short-term prisoners in England and Wales. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 7, 33–53.
27.
MemoryJ.GuoG.ParkerK.SuttonT. (1999). Comparing disciplinary infraction rates of North Carolina fair sentencing and structured sentencing inmates: A natural experiment. The Prison Journal, 79(1), 45–71.
28.
NaginD. S.CullenF. T.JonsonC. L. (2009). Imprisonment and reoffending. Crime and Justice, 38(1), 115–200.
29.
PadfieldN. (2002). Beyond the tariff. Willan Publishing.
30.
PadfieldN.MarunaS. (2006). The revolving door at the prison gate: Exploring the dramatic increase in recalls to prison. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6(3), 329–352.
31.
Palmor Report. (2010, July). Parole boards examination report. Ministry of Justice. [Hebrew].
32.
PetersiliaJ. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press.
33.
PetersiliaJ. (2004). What works in prisoner reentry – reviewing and questioning the evidence. Federal Probation, 68(2), 4–8.
34.
PolascheckD. L. L.YesbergJ. A. (2018). High-risk violent prisoners’ patterns of change of parole on DRAOR’s dynamic risk and protective factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(3), 340–363.
35.
PolinskyM. (2013). Deterrence and the optimality of rewarding prisoners for good behavior. Stanford Law School.
Public Defenders’ Office. (2012, May). 2010-2011 activity report. Ministry of Justice. [Hebrew].
38.
SapirY. (2008). Against prevention? A response to Harcourt’s against prediction on actuarial and clinical predictions and the faults of incapacitation. Law & Social Inquiry, 33, 253–264.
39.
SharonE. (2003). Early release from prison. Nevo. [Hebrew].
40.
ShatnerH.IsserO. (2008). Analysis of the economic feasibility of the Prisoner Rehabilitation Authority. Economics Dept., Haifa University, [Hebrew].
41.
ShohamE.EfodiR.Yehosha-SternS. (2014). “Feeling almost like everyone else” – Israel’s electronic monitoring program: Perceptions and attitudes among released prisoners and their supervisors. International Law Research, 3(1), 159–176.
42.
SparksR.BottomsA. (1995). Legitimacy and order in prisons. British Journal of Sociology, 46, 45–62.
43.
State Attorney. (2016). Directive 12.1 – considerations for determining the position of the representative of government legal counsel at parole boards. State Attorney’s office. [Hebrew].
44.
State Comptroller Report. (2014). Annual report 64c: Aspects of prisoner rehabilitation. State Comptroller’s Office. [Hebrew].
TochH. (1992). Mosaic of despair: Human breakdowns in prison. American Psychological Association.
47.
TonryM. (2011). Less imprisonment is no doubt a good thing, more policing is not. Criminology & Public Policy, 10(1), 137–152.
48.
TzengS. (2014). Applying DEMATEL to investigate the relationship between factors affecting parole boards’ decision-making in Taiwan. The Prison Journal, 94(1), 118–136.
49.
WebsterR.HeddermanC.TurnbullP.MayT. (2001). Building bridges to employment for prisoners. The communication and Development Unit. Home office.
50.
Weinshall-MargelK.ShapardJ. (2011). Overlooked factors in the analysis of parole decisions. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 108(42), E833.
51.
WhiteS. (1976). Alexander Maconochie and the development of parole. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 67(1), 72–88.
52.
WilsonD. B.GallagherC. A.MacKenzieD. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of corrections- based education, vocation, and work programs for adult offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 247–368.
53.
WoodP. B. (2007). Exploring the positive punishment effect among incarcerated adult offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(2), 8–22.
