This study explores lived experiences of repeat drug offenders in Malaysia, their reasons for recidivating, and related shortcomings in prison rehabilitation programs. We categorize the prisoners’ descriptions and interpretations of their experiences after participating in rehabilitation programming. We are able, as a result, to shed light on these offenders’ perspectives on the treatment efforts in which they were involved.
Al-TayyibA. A.KoesterS. (2011). Injection drug users’ experience with and attitudes toward methadone clinics in Denver, CO. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 41(1), 30–36.
BahrS. J.HarrisP. E.StrobellJ. H.TaylorB. M. (2013). An evaluation of a short-term drug treatment for jail inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(10), 1275–1296.
4.
BahrS. J.MastersA. L.TaylorB. M. (2012). What works in substance abuse treatment programs for offenders?The Prison Journal, 92(2), 155–174.
5.
ChandlerR. K.FletcherB. W.VolkowN. D. (2009). Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system: Improving public health and safety. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301(2), 183–190.
6.
DahlH. V. (2007). The methadone game: Control strategies and responses. In FountainJ.DirkJ. F. (Eds.), Drugs in society: European perspectives (pp. 102–115). Radcliffe.
7.
DeeringD. E.SheridanJ.SellmanJ. D.AdamsonS. J.PooleyS.RobertsonR.HendersonC. (2011). Consumer and treatment provider perspectives on reducing barriers to opioid treatment and improving treatment attractiveness. Addictive Behaviors, 36(6), 636–642.
8.
DolanK.KhoeiE. M.BrentariC.StevensA. (2007). Prisons and drugs: A global review of incarceration, drug use, and drug services. Beckley Foundation.
9.
DuweG.KingM. (2013). Can faith-based correctional programs work? An outcome evaluation of the Inner Change Freedom initiative in Minnesota. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(7), 813–841.
10.
FarrarS. A. (2013). Crime and criminal justice in Malaysia. In LiuJ.HebentonB.JouS. (Eds.), Handbook of Asian criminology (pp. 231–246). Springer.
11.
FrankV. A.DahlH. V.HolmK. E.KolindT. (2015). Inmates’ perspectives on prison drug treatment: A qualitative study from three prisons in Denmark. Probation Journal, 62(2), 156–171.
12.
GalassiA.MpofuE.AthanasouJ. (2015). Therapeutic community treatment of an inmate population with substance use disorders: Post-release trends in re-arrest, re-incarceration, and drug misuse relapse. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(6), 7059–7072.
13.
GillM. J. (2014). The possibilities of phenomenology for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 118–137.
14.
HansenG. V. (2017). The “Short Addiction Program”: Experiences from an intervention by the correctional services in Norway. Criminal Justice Studies, 30(1), 86–96.
15.
HuntG.BarkerJ. (1999). Drug treatment in contemporary anthropology and sociology. European Addiction Research, 5(1), 126–132.
16.
JonesI.BrownL.HollowayI. (2013). Qualitative research in sport and physical activity. SAGE.
17.
KoesterS.AndersonK.HofferL. (1999). Active heroin injector’s perceptions and use of methadone treatment. Substance Use & Misuse, 34(14), 2135–2153.
18.
KolindT. (2007). Form or content: The application of user perspectives in treatment research. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 14(3), 261–275.
19.
LaudetA. B.WhiteW. (2010). What are your priorities right now? Identifying service needs across recovery stages to inform service development. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38(1), 51–59.
20.
LaudetA. B.StanickV.SandsB. (2009). What could the program have done differently? A qualitative examination of reasons for leaving outpatient treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 37(2), 182–190.
21.
LeechaiananY.LongmireD. R. (2013). The use of the death penalty for drug trafficking in the United States, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand: A comparative legal analysis. Laws, 2(2), 115–149.
22.
LipseyM. W.CullenF. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297–320.
23.
McKeganeyN.MorrisZ.NealeJ.RobertsonM. (2004). What are drug users looking for when they contact drug services: Abstinence or harm reduction?Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 11(5), 423–435.
24.
Miner-RomanoffK. (2012). Interpretive and critical phenomenological crime studies: A model design. The Qualitative Report, 17(27), 1–32. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss27/2
25.
MitchellO.WilsonD. B.MacKenzieD. L. (2007). Does incarceration-based drug treatment reduce recidivism? A meta-analytic synthesis of the research. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3(2), 353–375.
26.
NealeJ. (1998). Drug users’ views of prescribed methadone. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 5(1), 33–45.
27.
NovakA. (2014). The future of the mandatory death penalty in Malaysia and Singapore: Asian values and abolition in comparative perspective, with implications for Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law, 1, 303–318.
28.
RayB.GrommonE.BuchananV.BrownB.WatsonD. P. (2017). Access to recovery and recidivism among former prison inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(8), 874–893.
WeekesJ. R.MoserA. E.WheatleyM.MathesonF. I. (2013). What works in reducing substance-related offending? In CraigL. A.MoserA. E.GannonF. L. (Eds.), What works in offender rehabilitation? An evidence-based approach to assessment and treatment (pp. 237–254). John Wiley.
31.
WexlerH. K.FalkinG. P.LiptonD. S. (1990). Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 71–92.
32.
YangY.PerkinsD. R.StearnsA. E. (2018). Barriers and facilitators to treatment engagement among clients in inpatients substance abuse treatment. Qualitative Health Research, 28(9), 1474–1485.
