Penal confinement in Danish, Finnish, and Swedish prisons has become a topic of growing interest in comparative penal research. While prison sentences in these countries are characterized by reintegration, offenders serving life sentences with unknown dates of release pose particular challenges. This study involved comparing and contrasting the enforcement of life sentences in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden through comparative legal research and interviews with criminal justice practitioners. The findings suggest reintegrative efforts for life-imprisoned offenders are in theory the same as those for any other prisoner but, in practice, some implementation difficulties arise due to the indefinite character of their sentence.
BonczarT. B. (2011, May). National corrections reporting program: Sentence length of state prisoners, by offense, admission type, sex, and race. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2056
4.
ClemmerD. (1950). Observations on imprisonment as a source of criminality. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 41, 311-319.
Council of Europe Rec (2003)23. Recommendation of the committee of ministers to member states on the management by prison administrations on life-sentence and other long-term prisoners. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/cm
7.
Danish Department of Prison and Probation. (2014, July). Statistik 2013 (Annual statistical report of the Danish Department of Prison and Probation). Copenhagen, Denmark: Directorate of the Danish Prison and Probation Service, Danish Ministry of Justice.
DavisC.BahrS. J.WardC. (2012). The process of offender reintegration: Perceptions of what helps prisoners reenter society. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 13, 446-469.
10.
EngbøH. J. (2005). Straffuldbyrdelsesret [Sentence Enforcement Act] (2nd ed.). Copenhagen, Denmark: Jurist- Og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
FlanaganT. J. (1980). The pains of long-term imprisonment: A comparison of British and American perspectives. The British Journal of Criminology, 20, 148-156.
14.
FlanaganT. J. (Ed.). (1995). Long-term imprisonment: Policy, science, and correctional practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
FoucaultM. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
16.
GideonL.SungH. E. (2010). Rethinking corrections: Rehabilitation, reentry, and reintegration. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
JewkesY. (2005). Loss, liminality and the life sentence: Managing identity through a disrupted lifecourse. In LieblingA.MarunaS. (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment (pp. 366-388). New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
KaijalainenM.MohellU. (2014). Finnish penal system in short (Rikosseuraamuslaitos [Finnish Criminal Sanctions Agency]). Helsinki, Finland: Kopijyvä.
LaubJ. H.SampsonR. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (pp. 1-69). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
MarunaS.ImmarigeonR. (Eds.). (2004). After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration. Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.
23.
MarunaS.ImmarigeonR.LeBelT. P. (2004). Ex-offender reintegration: Theory and practice. In MarunaS.ImmarigeonR. (Eds.), After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration (pp. 3-26). Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.
NilssonR. (2003). The Swedish prison system in historical perspective: A story of successful failure?Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 4, 1-20.
PorporinoF. (1990). Difference in response to long-term imprisonment: Implications for the management of long-term offenders. The Prison Journal, 70, 35-45.
30.
PrattJ. (2008). Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess: Part I: The nature and roots of Scandinavian exceptionalism. The British Journal of Criminology, 48, 119-137.
31.
PrattJ.ErikssonA. (2011). “Mr. Larsson is walking out again”: The origins and development of Scandinavian prison systems. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44, 7-23.
32.
RentzmannW. (2008, June25-28). Prison policy, prison regime and prisoners’ rights in Denmark contribution to prison policy and prisoners’ rights. Proceedings of the Colloquium of the International Penal and Penitentiary Foundation (IPPF), Stavern, Norway.
33.
SchartmuellerD. (2014). Too dangerous to get out? The use of individualized release mechanisms for lifetime incarcerated offenders in Sweden. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25, 407-431.
34.
SchartmuellerD. (2015). Life imprisonment in Scandinavia: The ultimate punishment in the penal environments of Denmark, Finland, and Sweden (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
35.
SchartmuellerD. (2018). How Long is Life? Comparing the Processes of Release for Life-Imprisoned Offenders in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 1-18.
36.
SnortumJ. R.BødalK. (1985). Conditions of confinement within security prisons: Scandinavia and California. Crime & Delinquency, 31, 573-600.
37.
StohrM. K.WalshA. (2015). Corrections: The essentials. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
38.
Swedish Government Official Reports [StatensOffentligaUtredningar] (SOU) (2002:26). Justiedepartmentent (Swedish Ministry of Justice). Report of the inquiry regarding the examination of release options for life-time incarcerated [BetänkandefrånUtredningen om frigivningsprövningavlivstidsdömda].Retrieved from https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/arende/betankande/omvandling-av-fangelse-pa-livstid_GT01JuU8
