Parole rejection/approval of inmates is subject to the decision-making of the parole board members of each prison. Previous studies have found that many factors influence the decision of the parole board. This study introduces Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), which is commonly used in commercial and industrial fields, to further explore the subjective factors parole board members consider in parole decisions. This study surveyed 20 parole board members in Taiwan and the results show that the major factors affecting the decision-making of parole boards include crime characteristics and offender recidivism risk, with crime characteristics being the most important factor.
BurkeP. (Ed.). (2003). A Handbook for New Parole Board Members: Part of a Resource Kit for New Parole Board Members. California, MO: Association of Paroling Authorities International. Retrieved from http://www.apaintl.org/documents/CEPPParoleHandbook.pdf
2.
CaplanJ. M. (2007). What factors affect parole: A review of empirical research. Federal Probation, 71(1), 16-19.
3.
ChangS. C. (2007). Review and reform of parole system [In Chinese]. Journal of Criminology, 10(1), 89-114.
4.
ChenY. S.LinX. M.SuY. C. (2007). An investigation in factors affecting parole rejection/approval [In Chinese]. Law Enforcement Review, 3(2), 1-26.
5.
GabusA.FontelaE. (1973). Perceptions of the world problematique: Communication procedure, Communicating with those bearing collective responsibility (DEMATEL Report No. 1). Geneva, Switzerland: Battelle Geneva Research Centre.
6.
HsuF. S. (2005). Criminal policies [In Chinese]. Taoyuan, Taiwan: Central Police University.
7.
HuebnerB. M.BynumT. S. (2006). An analysis of parole decision making using a sample of sex offenders: A focal concerns perspective. Criminology, 44, 961-991.
8.
IirajpourA.HajimirzaM.AlaviM. G.KazemiS. (2012). Identification and evaluation of the most effective factors in green supplier selection using DEMATEL method. Journal of Basic & Applied Scientific Research, 2, 4485-4493.
9.
LienH. R. (2009). A study about parole recidivism and case reviewing indication (Unpublished master’s thesis) [In Chinese]. Taoyuan, Taiwan: Central Police University.
10.
LindseyS. C.MillerM. K. (2011). Discretionary release decisions of actual and mock parole board members: Implications for community sentiment and parole decision-making research. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 18, 498-516.
PetersiliaJ. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York, NY: Oxford.
13.
ShiehJ. I.WuH. H.HuangK. K. (2010). A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23, 277-282.
14.
SuH. S. (2010). Research on the influence factors in parole decision-making (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) [In Chinese]. Chiayi, Taiwan: National Chung Cheng University.
15.
TzengG. H.ChiangC. H.LiC. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems With Applications, 32, 1028-1044.
16.
WilkinsL. T. (1982). Parole decisions. In KonecniV. J.EbbesenE. B. (Eds.), From criminal justice system: A social-psychological analysis (pp. 367-392). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
17.
WuW. W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems With Applications, 38, 828-835.
18.
WuW. W.LeeY. T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems With Applications, 32, 499-507.
