Community corrections has grown into a salient component of the correctional system. This article traces the growth and development of community-based sanctions in the United States. The authors assert that the evolution of community corrections has largely been shaped by its enduring relationship with the prison. Thus, it is not possible to fully comprehend the evolution of community-based corrections without considering the influence of the institutions. As such, this article documents the development and durability of community corrections by focusing on their unique and dynamic relationship with the prison.
Allen, F.A. (1981). The decline of the rehabilitative ideal. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
American Friends Service Committee. (1971). Struggle for justice. New York: Hill & Wang.
3.
Augustus, J. (1972). John Augustus: First probation officer. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith.
4.
Benekos, P.J. (1990). Beyond reintegration: Community corrections in a retributive era. Federal Probation, 54(1), 52-56.
5.
Clear, T.R., & Hardyman, P.L. (1990). The new intensive supervision movement. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 42-61.
6.
Cressey, D.R. (1965). Prison organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 1023-1070). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally and Company.
7.
Cromwell, P., Killinger, G., & Kerper, H. (1974). The history and concept of parole. In G. Killinger & P. F. Cromwell (Eds.), Corrections in the community: Alternatives to imprisonment selected readings (pp. 233-241). St. Paul, MN : West.
8.
Cullen, F.T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Volume 3-Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 109-175). Washington, DC : National Institute of Justice.
Cullen, F.T., Wright, J.P., & Applegate, B.K. (1996). Control in the community: The limits of reform. In A. Harland (Ed), Choosing correctional options that work (pp. 69-116). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Dressler, D. (1969). Practice and theory of probation and parole. New York: Columbia University Press.
12.
Erwin, B. (1986). Turning up the heat on probationers in Georgia . Federal Probation, 50(2), 17-24.
13.
Feeley, M.M., & Simon, J. (1992). New penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implication. Criminology, 30(4), 449-474.
14.
Fogel, D. (1975). We are the living proof: The justice model for corrections. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson .
15.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison . New York: Random House.
16.
Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Glaze, L.E., & Bonczar, T.P. (2007). Probation and parole in the United States, 2006. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
18.
Gottfredson, D.M., & Tonry, M. (1987). Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Harland, A., & Rosen, C.J. (1977). Sentencing theory and intensive supervision caseload . Federal Probation, 51, 33-42.
20.
Harris, M.K. (1984). Rethinking probation in the justice model. In P. McAnany, D. Thomson, & D. Fogel (Eds.), Probation and justice: Reconsideration of a mission (pp. 15-37). Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
21.
Harris, M.K. (1986). The goals of community sanctions. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
22.
Harris, P., & Smith, S. (1996). Developing community corrections: An implementation perspective. In A. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work (pp. 183-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Hoffman, P.B. (2003). History of the federal parole system. Washington, DC: U.S. Parole Commission.
24.
Hudson, B.A. (1996). Understanding justice: An introduction to ideas, perspectives and controversies in modern penal theory. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
25.
Latessa, E.J., & Travis, L.F. (1992). Residential community corrections programs. In J. M. Byrne, A. J. Lurigio, & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 166-181). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Linder, C., & Saverse, R. (1984a). The evolution of probation: Early salaries, qualifications, and hiring practices. Federal Probation, 48(1), 3-10.
27.
Linder, C., & Saverse, R. (1984b). The evolution of probation: The historical contributions of the volunteer. Federal Probation, 48(2), 3-10.
28.
Lurigio, A.J., & Petersilia, J. (1992). The emergence of intensive probation supervision programs in the United States. In J. M. Byrne, A. J. Lurigio , & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 3-17). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Lynch, J.P., & Sabol, W.J.( 2001). Prisoner reentry in perspective. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
30.
Martinson, R. (1976). What works?-Questions and answers about prison reform. In R. Martinson, T. Palmer, & S. Adams (Eds.), Rehabilitation, recidivism, and research (pp. 7-40). Hackensack, NJ: National Council on Crime and Delinquency .
31.
Meranze, M. (1996). Laboratories of virtue: Punishment, revolution, and authority in Philadelphia, 1760-1835. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
32.
Morris, N. (2002). Maconochie's gentlemen: The story of Norfolk Island and the roots of modern prison reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Morris, N., & Tonry, M. (1990). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals. (1974). Parole. In G. Killinger & P. F. Cromwell (Eds.), Corrections in the community: Alternatives to imprisonment selected readings (pp. 420-482). St. Paul, MN : West.
35.
Palmer, T. (1976). Martinson revisited. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12, 133-152.
36.
Parent, D. (1990). Residential community corrections: Developing an integrated corrections policy. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
37.
Petersilia, J. (1998). A decade of experimenting with intermediate sanctions: What have we learned? Federal Probation, 62(2), 3-10.
38.
Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Evaluating intensive supervision probation/parole: Results of a nationwide experiment. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
39.
Petersilia, J., Turner, S., Kahan, J., & Peterson, J. (1985). Granting felons probation: Public risks and alternatives . Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
40.
Pisciotta, A.W. (1994). Benevolent repression: Social control and the American reformatory-prison movement. New York: New York University Press.
41.
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice. (1967). The challenge of crime in a free society. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
42.
Renzema, M. (1992). Home confinement programs: Development, implementation, and impact. In J. M. Byrne, A. J. Lurigio, & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 41-53). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Rhine, E.E. (1998). Probation and parole supervision: Time for a new narrative. Perspectives, 22(1), 26-28.
44.
Rothman, D.J. (1971). Discovery of the asylum: Social order and disorder in the new republic. Boston: Little, Brown.
45.
Rothman, D.J. (1980). Conscience and convenience: The asylum and its alternatives in progressive America. Boston: Little, Brown.
46.
Seiter, R.P. (2005). Corrections: An introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
47.
Simon, J. (1993). Poor discipline: Parole and the social control of the underclass, 1980-1990. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Travis, J., & Lawrence, S. (2002). Beyond the prison gates: The state of parole in America. Washington, DC: Urban Institute .
49.
United Nations, Department of Social Affairs. ( 1974). The origins of probation. In G. Killinger & P. F. Cromwell (Eds.), Corrections in the community: Alternatives to imprisonment selected readings (pp. 89-96). St. Paul, MN: West.
50.
von Hirsch, A. (1976). Doing justice. New York: Hill and Wang.
51.
Wilson, J.Q. (1975). Thinking about crime. New York : Basic Books.
52.
Zimring, F.E., & Hawkins, G. (1995). Incapacitation: Penal confinement and the restraint of crime. New York: Oxford University Press.
