The months around the US 2020 presidential election were characterized by polarization, populism, conspiracy theories, and violent acts, far exceeding usual out-party animosity in western democracies. Using an original two-wave panel survey fielded before the election in November 2020 (n = 3111) and after the inauguration in January 2021 (n = 3384), supported with data from the American National Election Study (ANES, n = 3080), we investigate the dynamics of political violence justification and its connection with populist attitudes and conspiracy beliefs. While we find that conspiracy beliefs are associated with higher justification of violence, the relationship with populist attitudes is mixed, and mostly depends on whether people believe in conspiracy theories or not—with populist attitudes being associated with greater political violence justification among those who believe conspiracy theories, while having no or even a negative correlation among those who do not. Finally, results from fixed-effects models provide some evidence for a temporal interpretation of the relationships, indicating that an increase in conspiracy beliefs is strongly and consistently associated with an increased willingness to justify violence.
AndersonCABushmanBJ (2002) Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology53 (1): 27–51.
4.
ArmalyMTEndersAM (2024) Who Supports Political Violence?Perspectives on Politics 22 (2): 427–444.
5.
ArmalyMTBuckleyDTEndersAM (2022) Christian Nationalism and Political Violence: Victimhood, Racial Identity, Conspiracy, and Support for the Capitol Attacks. Political Behavior44 (2): 937–960.
6.
BadaanVHoffarthMRoperC, et al. (2023) Ideological Asymmetries in Online Hostility, Intimidation, Obscenity, and Prejudice. Scientific Reports13: 22345.
7.
BélangerJJRobbinsBGMuhammadH, et al. (2020) Supporting Political Violence: The Role of Ideological Passion and Social Network. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations23 (8): 1187–1203.
8.
BélangerJJSchumpeBMNocitiN, et al. (2019) Passion and Moral Disengagement: Different Pathways to Political Activism. Journal of Personality87 (6): 1234–1249.
9.
BesawC (2021) Election Violence Spiked Worldwide in 2020—Will This Year Be Better?The Conversation, February. Available at: http://theconversation.com/election-violence-spiked-worldwide-in-2020-will-this-year-be-better-153975
10.
BesawCFrankM (2021) ELection VIolence (ELVI) Indicators and Forecast Dataset. Broomfield, CO: One Earth Future.
11.
BosilkovI (2023) Too Incivil to Polarize: The Effects of Exposure to Mediatized Interparty Violence on Affective Polarization. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties33 (3): 441–461.
12.
BrothertonRFrenchCCPickeringAD (2013) Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale. Frontiers in Psychology4: 279.
13.
BrüderlJLudwigV (2015) Fixed-Effects Panel Regression. In: BestHWolfC (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Regression Analysis and Causal Inference. London: Sage, pp.327–357.
14.
BunzelJH (1967) Anti-Politics in America: Reflections on the Anti-Political Temper and Its Distortions of the Democratic Process. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
15.
ButlerLDKoopmanCZimbardoPG (1995) The Psychological Impact of Viewing the Film “JFK”: Emotions, Beliefs, and Political Behavioral Intentions. Political Psychology16 (2): 237–257.
16.
Castanho SilvaBJungkunzSHelblingM, et al. (2020) An Empirical Comparison of Seven Populist Attitudes Scales. Political Research Quarterly73 (2): 409–424.
17.
Castanho SilvaBVegettiFLittvayL (2017) The Elite Is Up to Something: Exploring the Relation Between Populism and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Swiss Political Science Review23 (4): 423–443.
18.
ClaassenC (2016) Group Entitlement, Anger and Participation in Intergroup Violence. British Journal of Political Science46 (1): 127–148.
19.
CrawfordJTPilanskiJM (2014) Political Intolerance, Right and Left. Political Psychology35 (6): 841–851.
20.
CroissantYMilloG (2008) Panel Data Econometrics in R: The plm Package. Journal of Statistical Software27 (2): 1–43.
21.
DouglasKMUscinskiJESuttonRM, et al. (2019) Understanding Conspiracy Theories. Political Psychology40 (Suppl. 1): 3–35.
22.
EndersAKlofstadCStolerJ, et al. (2023) How Anti-Social Personality Traits and Anti-Establishment Views Promote Beliefs in Election Fraud, QAnon, and COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation. American Politics Research51 (2): 247–259.
23.
EndersAUscinskiJEKlofstadCA, et al. (2021) Do Conspiracy Beliefs Form a Belief System? Examining the Structure and Organization of Conspiracy Beliefs. Journal of Social and Political Psychology9 (1): 255–271.
24.
EndersAUscinskiJEKlofstadCA, et al. (2022) Who Supports QAnon? A Case Study in Political Extremism. The Journal of Politics84 (3): 1844–1849.
25.
ErisenCGuidiMMartiniS, et al. (2021) Psychological Correlates of Populist Attitudes. Advances in Political Psychology42 (Suppl. 1): 149–171.
26.
GerberMMGonzálezRCarvachoH, et al. (2018) On the Justification of Intergroup Violence: The Roles of Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy, and Group Identity in Attitudes toward Violence among Indigenous People. Psychology of Violence8 (3): 379–389.
27.
GoertzGMahoneyJ (2012) A Tale of Two Cultures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Hafner-BurtonEMHydeSDJablonskiRS (2018) Surviving Elections: Election Violence, Incumbent Victory and Post-Election Repercussions. British Journal of Political Science48 (2): 459–488.
29.
HawkinsKA (2009) Is Chávez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies42 (8): 1040–1067.
30.
HayesBCMcAllisterI (2001) Sowing Dragon’s Teeth: Public Support for Political Violence and Paramilitarism in Northern Ireland. Political Studies49 (5): 901–922.
31.
HayesBCMcAllisterI (2005) Public Support for Political Violence and Paramilitarism in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Terrorism and Political Violence17 (4): 599–617.
32.
HofstadterR (1964) The Paranoid Style in American Politics. Harper’s Magazine, November, pp. 77–86.
33.
HöglundK (2009) Electoral Violence in Conflict-Ridden Societies: Concepts, Causes, and Conse-Quences. Terrorism and Political Violence21 (3): 412–427.
34.
HuddyLMasonLAarøeL (2015) Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity. American Political Science Review109 (1): 1–17.
35.
ImhoffRBruderM (2014) Speaking (Un-)Truth to Power: Conspiracy Mentality as a Generalised Political Attitude. European Journal of Personality28 (1): 25–43.
36.
ImhoffRDieterleLLambertyP (2021) Resolving the Puzzle of Conspiracy Worldview and Political Activism: Belief in Secret Plots Decreases Normative but Increases Nonnormative Political Engagement. Social Psychological and Personality Science12 (1): 71–79.
37.
JolleyDPatersonJL (2020) Pylons Ablaze: Examining the Role of 5G COVID-19 Conspiracy Beliefs and Support for Violence. British Journal of Social Psychology59 (3): 628–640.
38.
JolleyDDouglasKMLeiteAC, et al. (2019) Belief in Conspiracy Theories and Intentions to Engage in Everyday Crime. British Journal of Social Psychology58 (3): 534–549.
39.
JostJT (2021) Left and Right: The Psychological Significance of a Political Distinction. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
JungkunzS (2022) The Nature and Origins of Political Extremism in Germany and Beyond. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
JungkunzS (2023) Economic Hardship Increases Justification of Political Violence. Representation. DOI: 10.1080/00344893.2023.2292177.
42.
JungkunzSWeissJ (2024) Populist Attitudes among Teenagers: How Negative Relationships with Socialization Agents Are Linked to Populist Attitudes. Perspectives on Politics. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592724000434.
43.
JungkunzSFaheyRAHinoA (2021) How Populist Attitudes Scales Fail to Capture Support for Populists in Power. PLoS ONE16 (12): e0261658.
44.
KalmoeNP (2014) Fueling the Fire: Violent Metaphors, Trait Aggression, and Support for Political Violence. Political Communication31 (4): 545–563.
KalmoeNPMasonL (2022a) A Holistic View of Conditional American Support for Political Violence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119 (32): e2207237119.
47.
KalmoeNPMasonL (2022b) Radical American Partisanship. Mapping Violent Hostility, Its Causes, and the Consequences for Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
KleinCCluttonPPolitoV (2018) Topic Modeling Reveals Distinct Interests within an Online Conspiracy Forum. Frontiers in Psychology9 (189): 1–12.
49.
KruglanskiAWGelfandMJBélangerJJ, et al. (2014) The Psychology of Radicalization and Deradicalization: How Significance Quest Impacts Violent Extremism. Political Psychology 35 (Suppl. 1): 69–93.
50.
KruglanskiAWJaskoKChernikovaM, et al. (2017) To the Fringe and Back: Violent Extremism and the Psychology of Deviance. American Psychologist72 (3): 217–230.
51.
LipsetSMRaabE (1971) The Politics of Unreason. Right-Wing Extremism in America, 1790-1970. London: Heinemann.
LüdeckeD (2018a) ggeffects: Tidy Data Frames of Marginal Effects from Regression Models. Journal of Open Source Software3 (26): 772.
54.
LüdeckeD (2018b) sjmisc: Data and Variable Transformation Functions. Journal of Open Source Software3 (26): 754.
55.
McCauleyCRMoskalenkoS (2011) Friction: How Radicalization Happens to Then and Us. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
MillerJMSaundersKLFarhartCE (2016) Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust. American Journal of Political Science60 (4): 824–844.
57.
MuddeC (2004) The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39 (3): 541–563.
58.
ObaidiMKunstJOzerS, et al. (2022) The “Great Replacement” Conspiracy: How the Perceived Ousting of Whites Can Evoke Violent Extremism and Islamophobia. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations25 (7): 1675–1695.
59.
OliverJEWoodTJ (2014) Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion. American Journal of Political Science58 (4): 952–966.
60.
Pérez-RajóJ (2024) Does Populism Fuel Affective Polarization? An Individual-Level Panel Data Analysis. Political Studies. DOI: 10.1177/00323217231224579.
61.
PiazzaJA (2024) Populism and Support for Political Violence in the United States: Assessing the Role of Grievances, Distrust of Political Institutions, Social Change Threat, and Political Illiberalism. Political Research Quarterly77: 152–166.
62.
R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
63.
Schatto-EckrodtTBobergSWintterlinF, et al. (2020) Use and Assessment of Sources in Conspiracy Theorists’ Communities. In: GrimmeCPreussMTakesFW, et al. (eds) Disinformation in Open Online Media. Cham: Springer, pp. 25–32.
64.
SchlipphakBIsaniMBackMD (2022) Conspiracy Theory Beliefs and Political Trust: The Moderating Role of Political Communication. Politics and Governance10 (4): 157–167.
65.
SchulzAMüllerPSchemerC, et al. (2018) Measuring Populist Attitudes on Three Dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research30 (2): 316–326.
66.
UscinskiJEEndersAMSeeligMI, et al. (2021) American Politics in Two Dimensions: Partisan and Ideological Identities Versus Anti-Establishment Orientations. American Journal of Political Science65 (4): 877–895.
67.
van ProoijenJW (2020) An Existential Threat Model of Conspiracy Theories. European Psychologist25 (1): 16–25.
68.
van ProoijenJWDouglasKM (2017) Conspiracy Theories as Part of History: The Role of Societal Crisis Situations. Memory Studies10 (3): 323–333.
69.
VasilopoulosPJostJT (2020) Psychological Similarities and Dissimilarities between Left-Wing and Right-Wing Populists: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Survey in France. Journal of Research in Personality88: 104004.
70.
VegettiFLittvayL (2022) Belief in Conspiracy Theories and Attitudes Toward Political Violence. Italian Political Science Review52 (1): 18–32.
71.
WestwoodSGrimmerJTylerM, et al. (2022) American Support for Political Violence Is Low. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119 (12): e2116870119.
72.
WettsteinMSchulzASteenbergenM, et al. (2020) Measuring Populism across Nations: Testing for Measurement Invariance of an Inventory of Populist Attitudes. International Journal of Public Opinion Research32 (2): 284–305.
73.
WickhamH (2016) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, 2nd edn.Cham: Springer.
74.
WuttkeASchimpfCSchoenH (2020) When the Whole Is Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts: On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Populist Attitudes and Other Multidimensional Constructs. American Political Science Review114 (2): 356–374.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
