The 2016 European Union referendum revealed fundamental divisions in British politics and society more broadly. It also raised key questions around representation and the role of Members of Parliament. Should they follow their own judgement or their constituents’ preferences when the two are not aligned? This study uses data from the Representative Audit of Britain Survey to examine what parliamentary candidates believe the answer to this question should be. We find that most candidates expect Members of Parliament to prioritise their own views. This belief is particularly prevalent among incumbents and those who do not think of Members of Parliament as career politicians. We also find a gender effect as male candidates are more likely to think that Members of Parliament should prioritise their own views than female candidates. Interestingly, however, there is no evidence of a Brexit effect when we compare the views of 2015 and 2017 general election candidates.
AdlerSECaytonAFGriffinJD (2018) Representation When Constituent Opinion and District Conditions Collide. Political Research Quarterly71 (3): 681–694.
2.
AlbarracínJWangWAlbarracínD (2012) Are Confident Partisans Disloyal? The Role of Defensive Confidence in Party Defection. Journal of Applied Social Psychology42 (7): 1576–1598.
3.
AndewegRBThomassenJJA (2005) Modes of Political Representation: Toward a New Typology. Legislative Studies Quarterly30 (4): 507–528.
4.
BarkerDCCarmanCJ (2012) Representing Red and Blue: How the Culture Wars Change the Way Citizens Speak and Politicians Listen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BaughmanJ (2004) Party, Constituency, and Representation: Votes on Abortion in the British House of Commons. Public Policy150 (1–2): 63–85.
CampbellRCowleyP (2014) Rebellion Versus Loyalty, Shirking Versus Working: A Note on Framing Parliamentary Behaviour. Representation50 (4): 421–427.
11.
CampbellRLovenduskiJ (2015) What Should MPs Do? Public and Parliamentarians’ Views Compared. Parliamentary Affairs68 (4): 690–708.
12.
CampbellRCowleyPVivyanN, et al. (2019) Why Friends and Neighbors? Explaining the Electoral Appeal of Local Roots. The Journal of Politics81 (3): 937–951.
13.
CampbellRvan Heerde-HudsonJRüdigW (2017) The Representative Audit of Britain Survey ESRC – ES/L016508/1, 2015, 2017.
14.
CarmanCJ (2006) Public Preferences for Parliamentary Representation in the UK: An Overlooked Link?Political Studies54: 1103–1122.
15.
Comparative Candidates Survey (CCS) (2020) Comparative Candidates Survey Wave II [Dataset Cumulative File]. Distributed by FORS, Lausanne. Available at: https://doi.org/10.23662/FORS-DS-886-4
16.
ClarkeNJenningsWMossJ, et al. (2018) The Good Politician: Folk Theories, Political Interaction, and the Rise of Anti-politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
ConversePEPierceE (1986) Political Representation in France. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
18.
CowleyP (2002) Revolts and Rebellions: Parliamentary Voting Under Blair. London: Politico’s.
19.
CowleyPStuartM (2010) Party Rules, OK: Voting in the House of Commons on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill. Parliamentary Affairs63 (1): 173–181.
DeschouwerKDepauwS (2014) Representing the People: A Survey among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
DohertyD (2013) To Whom Do People Think Representatives Should Response: Their District or the Country?Public Opinion Quarterly77 (1): 237–255.
23.
DudzińskaAPoyetCCostaO, et al. (2014) Representational Roles. In: DeschouwerKDepauwS (eds) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.19–38.
24.
DuncanODDuncanB (1955) A Methodological Analysis of Segregation Indexes. American Sociological Review20 (2): 210–217.
Hafner-BurtonEMAlex HughesDVictorDG (2013) The Cognitive Revolution and the Political Psychology of Elite Decision Making. Perspectives on Politics11 (2): 368–386.
27.
HanrettyC (2017) Areal Interpolation and the UK’s Referendum on EU Membership. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties27 (4): 466–483.
28.
HeppellTCrinesAJefferyD (2017) The United Kingdom Referendum on European Union Membership: The Voting of Conservative Parliamentarians. Journal of Common Market Studies55 (4): 762–778.
KalaianHAFreemanDJ (1994) Gender Differences in and Educational Beliefs among Secondary Teacher Candidates. Teaching and Teacher Education10 (6): 647–658.
34.
KolpinskayaE (2017) Substantive Religious Representation in the UK Parliament: Examining Parliamentary Questions for Written Answers. Parliamentary Affairs70 (1): 111–131.
35.
LausbergAK (2016) Women and Representation: Collaboration in the Australian Federal Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs69 (2): 249–268.
36.
McKayL (2020) Does Constituency Focus Improve Attitudes to MPs? A Test for the UK. The Journal of Legislative Studies26: 11–26.
SaalfeldT (2011) Parliamentary Questions as Instruments of Substantive Representation: Visible Minorities in the UK House of Commons. The Journal of Legislative Studies17 (3): 271–289.
39.
SearingD (1994) Westminster’s World: Understanding Political Roles. London: Harvard University Press.
40.
SlapinJBKirklandJHLazzaroJA, et al. (2018) Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament. American Political Science Review112 (1): 15–30.
StanyerJArchettiCSorensenL (2017) The United Kingdom. Hybrid Populisms, Mixed Fortunes and Unstable Support. In: AalbergTEsserFReinemannC (eds) Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge, pp.165–180.
43.
SudulichLTrummSBridgewaterJ (2020) Parliamentary Representation: A Study of Candidates’ Views. Parliamentary Affairs73 (3): 522–542.
VasilopoulouS (2020) Brexit and the 2019 EP Election in the UK. Journal of Common Market Studies58: 80–90.
46.
WagnerMVivyanNGlinitzerK (2020) Costly Signals: Voter Responses to Parliamentary Dissent in Austria, Britain, and Germany. Legislative Studies Quarterly45: 645–678.
47.
WattsJBaleT (2019) Populism as an Phenomenon: The British Labour Party Under Jeremy Corbyn. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations21 (2): 99–115.
48.
ZmerliSNewtonK (2017) Objects of Political Trust: Scales and Hierarchies. In: ZmerliSvan der MeerT (eds) Handbook on Political Trust. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.104–124.
