The role of the symbolic is often overlooked in the public policy literature. Yet, it is a key component of public action, particularly in crisis management. During the Covid-19 pandemic, all democratic states needed to carry out cognitive and emotional work to persuade their citizens to show solidarity and comply with heavy restrictions. The near-simultaneous occurrence of the pandemic’s first wave (March–May 2020) allows us to compare the patterns of symbolic crisis management across four European countries (France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom). Our analysis finds significant variation in governments’ usage of the symbolic. We analyse leaders’ performances (wordcraft and stagecraft) as they try to reassure citizens, unite the nation, and legitimise themselves and their decisions. Our article shows not only that national leaders pay great attention to the symbolic in the management of crises, but also that their performances differ systematically in line with their personas and distinct national political cultures.
AnsellCBoinA‘t HartP (2014) Political Leadership in Times of Crisis. In: RhodesRAW‘t HartP (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.418–433.
2.
BakerWDOnealJR (2001) Patriotism or Opinion Leadership? The Nature and Origins of the ‘Rally “Round the Flag” Effect’. The Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (5): 661–87.
3.
BalzacqTLéonardSRuzickaJ (2016) ‘Securitization’ Revisited: Theory and Cases. International Relations30 (4): 494531.
4.
BaumMAGroelingT (2010) Reality Asserts Itself: Public Opinion on Iraq and the Elasticity of Reality. International Organization64 (3): 443–479.
5.
BelotC (2019) Exploring the Democratic Linkage through the Lens of Governmental Polling: A Research Agenda. French Politics17 (2): 21126.
6.
BergeronHBorrazOCastelP (2020) COVID-19: une crise organisationnelle. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
7.
Berg-SchlosserDRytlewskiR (eds) (1993) Political Culture in Germany. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
BoinALodgeMLuesinkM (2020) Learning from the COVID-19 Crisis: An Initial Analysis of National Responses. Policy Design and Practice3 (3): 189–204.
9.
BoinA‘t HartPSternPC, et al. (2017) The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BoussaguetLFaucherF (2018) La construction des discours présidentiels post-attentats à l’épreuve du temps. Mots: Les Langages du Politique118: 95115.
11.
BoussaguetLFaucherF (2020) Beyond a ‘Gesture’: The Treatment of the Symbolic in Public Policy Analysis. French Politics18 (1–2): 189–205.
12.
CernyPG (1988) The Process of Personal Leadership: The Case of De Gaulle. International Political Science Review9 (2): 131–142.
DevineDGaskellJJenningsW, et al. (2020) Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What Are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature. Political Studies Review19 (2): 274–285.
18.
DrakeH (2002) Jacques Delors et la Commission européenne. Un leadership unique?Politique Européenne8: 131–145.
19.
FaucherFBoussaguetL (2018) The Politics of Symbols. Reflections on the French Government’s Framing of the 2015 Terrorist Attacks. Parliamentary Affairs71 (1): 16995.
20.
FinlaysonA (2021) Performing Political Ideologies. In: The Oxford Handbook of Politics and Performance. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190863456.013.21.
21.
FleurdorgeD (2001) Les rituels du Président de la République. Presses Universitaires de France-PUF.
22.
GaffneyJ (2014) Performative Political Leadership. In: RhodesRAW‘t HartP (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.389–402.
23.
GeorgeALBennettA (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
24.
GoffmanE (1990) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.
25.
GormleyWT (1989) Taming the Bureaucracy: Muscles, Prayers, and Other Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
GreiffenhagenMGreiffenhagenS (eds) (2002) Handwörterbuch zur politischen Kultur der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
27.
HegeleYSchnabelJ (2021) Federalism and the Management of the COVID-19 Crisis: Centralisation, Decentralisation and (Non-)coordination. West European Politics44: 1052–1076.
28.
LacroixBLagroyeJ (eds) (1992) Le Président de la République. Usages et genèses d’une institution. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
29.
LazarM (2014) La République: une Italie plus unie ou plus désunie? In: Blanc-ChaléardM (ed.) D’Italie et d’ailleurs. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, pp.67–77.
LübbeH (1981) Staat Ohne Symbole. Die Politische Meinung194: 6–10.
32.
MartignyV (2016) Dire la France: Culture(s) et identités nationales. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
33.
MuellerJE (1985) War, Presidents and Public Opinion. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
34.
MusiedlakD (1995) Construction politique et identité nationale en Italie: De l’unité au fascisme. In: DiamantiI (ed.) L’Italie, une nation en suspens. Bruxelles: Complexe, pp.19–61.
35.
OpillardFPalleAMichelisL (2020) Discourse and Strategic Use of the Military in France and Europe in the COVID-19 Crisis. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie111 (3): 239–259.
36.
PécoutG (2009) Retrouver la nation des Italiens? Le sentiment national dans les régimes d’identité de l’Italie contemporaine. In: LarzardM (ed.) L’Italie contemporaine de 1945 à nos jours. Paris: Fayard, pp.129–141.
37.
PortelliH (2019) Droit constitutionnel. Dalloz.
38.
RaiSM (2015) Political Performance: A Framework for Analysing Democratic Politics. Political Studies63 (5): 1179–1197.
39.
RidolfiM (2012) Feste civili e giorni della memoria: L’Italia della Seconda Repubblica 1994-2011. In: BaioniMContiFRidolfiM (eds) Celebrare la nazione: Grandi anniversari e memorie pubbliche nella società contemporanea. Milan: Silvana Editoriale, pp.417–436.
40.
SchraffD (2021) Political Trust During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Rally around the Flag or Lockdown Effects?European Journal of Political Research60: 1007–1017.
41.
SeawrightJGerringJ (2008) Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly61 (2): 294–308.
42.
‘t HartP (1993) Symbols, Rituals and Power: The Lost Dimensions of Crisis Management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management1 (1): 36–50.
43.
‘t HartPUhrJ (2008) Public Leadership: Perspectives and Practices. Canberra, ACT, Australia: ANU Press.
44.
‘t HartPHeyseLBoinA (2001) New Trends in Crisis Management Practice and Crisis Management Research: Setting the Agenda. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management9 (4): 181–188.
45.
TillyC (1995) Contentious Repertoires in Great Britain, 1758–1834. In: TraugottMW (ed.) Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp.15–42.
46.
TurnerV (1975) Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
47.
UhrJ (2014) Rhetorical and Performative Analysis. In: RhodesRAW‘t HartP (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.253–266.
48.
YanowD (1996) How Does a Policy Mean? Interpreting Policy and Organizational Actions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
