Much comparative politics scholarship has examined whether economic inequality affects democratic values or political support in democracies. Nevertheless, they lack a close examination of the political effects of economic inequality and, more importantly, how economic inequality shapes political support in non-democracies. We provide an empirical test of the effect of economic inequality on regime support using the China data from the Asian Barometer Survey between 2002 and 2015. We argue and demonstrate that perceived economic inequality significantly reduces regime support in China. Moreover, using a causal mediation analysis, we find that the detrimental effect of perceived economic inequality on regime support is not driven by demands for redistribution, but rather by the political value orientation. These findings advance our understanding of the connection between economic inequality and political values and the economic base of political legitimacy in non-democracies.
AcemogluDRobinsonJ (2006) Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AlesinaALa FerraraE (2005) Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities. Journal of Public Economics89 (5–6): 897–931.
3.
AlesinaACozziGMantovanN (2012) The Evolution of Ideology, Fairness and Redistribution. The Economic Journal122 (565): 1244–1261.
4.
AndersonCJ (2007) The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability. Annual Review of Political Science10: 271–296.
5.
AndersonCJSingerMM (2008) The Sensitive Left and the Impervious Right: Multilevel Models and the Politics of Inequality, Ideology, and Legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies41 (4–5): 564–599.
6.
AnsellBSamuelsD (2014) Inequality and Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
ArielyGUslanerEM (2017) Corruption, Fairness, and Inequality. International Political Science Review38 (3): 349–362.
8.
BavettaSLi DonniPMarinoM (2020) How Consistent Are Perceptions of Inequality. Journal of Economic Psychology78: 102267.
9.
BeloshitzkayaV (2020) Democracy and Redistribution: The Role of Regime Revisited. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures34 (3): 571–590.
10.
BenabouROkEA (2001) Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The POUM Hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics116 (2): 447–487.
11.
BoixC (2003) Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BrattonMMattesR (2001) Support for Democracy in Africa: Intrinsic or Instrumental?British Journal of Political Science31 (3): 447–474.
13.
ChenD (2017) Local Distrust and Regime Support: Sources and Effects of Political Trust in China. Political Research Quarterly70 (2): 314–326.
14.
ChiEKwonHY (2016) The Trust-Eroding Effect of Perceived Inequality: Evidence from East Asian New Democracies. The Social Science Journal53: 318–328.
15.
ChuY-H (2013) Sources of Regime Legitimacy and the Debate Over the Chinese Model. The China Review13 (1): 1–42.
16.
ChuY-HWuC-E (2020) Equality of Opportunity and Satisfaction with the Political System: The Mediating Role of Regime Type. In: ParkC-MUslanerEM (eds) Inequality and Democratic Politics in East Asia. New York: Routledge, pp.96–115.
FinseraasH (2009) Income Inequality and Demand for Redistribution: A Multilevel Analysis of European Public Opinion. Scandinavian Political Studies32 (1): 94–119.
19.
GilleyB (2006) The Determinants of State Legitimacy: Results for 72 Countries. International Political Science Review27 (1): 47–71.
HaggardSKaufmanR (2012) Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule. American Political Science Review106 (3): 495–516.
22.
HaggardSKaufmanRLongJD (2013) Income, Occupation, and Preferences for Redistribution in the Developing World. Studies in Comparative and International Development48 (2): 113–140.
23.
HetheringtonMJ (2005) Why Trust Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
HollidayI (2000) Productivist Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy in East Asia. Political Studies48 (4): 706–723.
25.
HouleC (2018) Does Economic Inequality Breed Political Inequality?Democratization25 (8): 1500–1518.
26.
HouleCMillerMK (2019) Social Mobility and Democratic Attitudes: Evidence from Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa. Comparative Political Studies52 (11): 1610–1647.
27.
HuangK-PSchulerP (2018) A Status Quo Theory of Generalized Trust: Why Trust May Reduce the Prospects for Democratic Transition in East Asia. Comparative Politics51 (1): 121–139.
28.
HuangXGaoQ (2017) Does Social Insurance Enrollment Improve Citizen Assessment of Local Government Performance? Evidence from China. Social Science Research70: 28–40.
29.
HuheNTangM (2017) Contingent Instrumental and Intrinsic Support: Exploring Regime Support in Asia. Political Studies65 (1): 161–178.
30.
ImaiKKeeleLYamamotoT (2010) Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects. Statistical Science25 (1): 51–71.
31.
ImaiKKeeleLTingleyD, et al. (2011) Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies. American Political Science Review105 (4): 765–789.
32.
JiCJiangJ (2020) Enlightened One-Party Rule? Ideological Differences between Chinese Communist Party Members and the Mass Public. Political Research Quarterly73 (3): 651–666.
33.
JostJTHunyadyO (2002) The Psychology of System Justification and the Palliative Function of Ideology. European Review of Social Psychology13 (1): 111–153.
34.
KnutsenCHWegmannS (2016) Is Democracy about Redistribution?Democratization23 (1): 164–192.
35.
KrieckhausJSonBBellingerNM, et al. (2013) Economic Inequality and Democratic Support. The Journal of Politics76 (1): 139–151.
36.
KuhnA (2013) Inequality Perceptions, Distributional Norms, and Redistributive Preferences in East and West Germany. German Economic Review14 (4): 483–499.
37.
LaiD-YLueJ-DWuW-C (2021) Intergenerational Mobility and Preference for Redistribution: Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Asian Public Policy14 (1): 45–62.
38.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2000) Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science3: 183–219.
39.
LiHGongTXiaoH (2016) The Perception of Anti-corruption Efficacy in China: An Empirical Analysis. Social Indicators Research125: 885–903.
40.
LipsetSM (1960) Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
41.
LuJDicksonB (2020) Revisiting the Eastonian Framework on Political Support: Assessing Different Measures of Regime Support in Mainland China. Comparative Politics52 (4): 671–701.
42.
LüX (2014a) Does Changing Economic Well-Being Shape Resentment about Inequality in China?Studies in Comparative International Development49 (3): 300–320.
43.
LüX (2014b) Social Policy and Regime Legitimacy: The Effects of Education Reform in China. American Political Science Review108 (2): 423–437.
44.
LüXScheveK (2016) Self-Centered Inequity Aversion and the Mass Politics of Taxation. Comparative Political Studies49 (14): 1965–1997.
45.
MeltzerAHRichardSF (1981) A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy89 (Oct): 914–927.
46.
OsbergLSmeedingT (2006) Fair Inequality? Attitudes toward Pay Differentials: The United States in Comparative Perspective. American Sociological Review71: 450–473.
47.
Ou-YangRZhouYJ (2019) Economic Evaluations and Political Support in Authoritarian Countries: A Comparative Viewpoint. Asian Survey59 (4): 738–768.
48.
ParkC-M (2020) Assessing the Inequality-Democracy Linkage at the Individual Level: Evidence from East Asia. In: ParkC-MUslanerEM (eds) Inequality and Democratic Politics in East Asia. London; New York: Routledge, pp.75–95.
49.
PepinskyT (2014) The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism. British Journal of Political Science44 (3): 631–653.
50.
PerrellaAMLBelangerENadeauR, et al. (2016) Does a Growing Income Gap Affect Political Attitudes?Canadian Public Policy42 (1): 35–48.
51.
Pop- ElechesGTuckerJA (2017) Communism’s Shadow: Historical Legacies and Contemporary Political Attitudes Princeton Studies in Political Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
RikerWH (1990) Political Science and Rational Choice. In: AltJShepsleK (eds) Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.163–181.
53.
RoseRMishlerW (2002) Comparing Regime Support in Non-democratic and Democratic Countries. Democratization9 (2): 1–20.
54.
RoseRMishlerWMunroN (2011) Popular Support for an Undemocratic Regime: The Changing Views of Russians. New York: Cambridge University Press.
55.
ShiT (2015) The Cultural Logic of Politics in Mainland China and Taiwan. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
SoltF (2008) Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement. American Journal of Political Science52 (1): 48–60.
57.
SoltF (2012) The Social Origins of Authoritarianism. Political Research Quarterly65 (4): 703–713.
58.
TangMHuheNZhouQ (2015) Contingent Democratization: When Do Economic Crises Matter?British Journal of Political Science47: 71–90.
59.
TianW (2012) Sheng Yu Jumin Shouru Jini Xishu Cesuan Ji Qi Biandong Qushi Fenxi [Provincial Income Gini Coefficient Estimate and Changing Trend Analysis]. Jingji Kexue [Economics]2: 48–59.
60.
TingleyDYamamotoTHiroseK, et al. (2014) Mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software59 (5): 38.
61.
VisserMLubbersMKraaykampG, et al. (2014) Support for Radical Left Ideologies in Europe. European Journal of Political Research53: 541–558.
62.
WangZ (2005) Before the Emergence of Critical Citizens: Economic Development and Political Trust in China. International Review of Sociology15 (1): 155–171.
63.
WelzelCInglehartR (2009) Political Culture, Mass Beliefs, and Value Change. In: HaerpferCBernhagenPInglehartR, et al. (eds) Democratization. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.126–144.
64.
WhyteMK (2010) Myth of the Social Volcano: Perceptions of Inequality and Distributive Injustice in Contemporary China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
65.
WuX (2009) Income Inequality and Distributive Justice: A Comparative Analysis of Mainland China and Hong Kong. The China Quarterly200: 1033–1052.
66.
XieYZhouX (2014) Income Inequality in Today’s China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America111 (19): 6928–6933.
67.
ZhaoWXuJ (2020) Visible and Invisible Hands Intertwined: State-Market Symbiotic Interactions and Changing Income Inequality in Urban China. Social Science Research91: 102450.
68.
ZhouYJJinS (2018) Inequality and Political Trust in China: The Social Volcano Thesis Re-examined. The China Quarterly236: 1033–1062.
69.
ZhuJHuangHZhangD (2019) “Big Tigers, Big Data”: Learning Social Reactions to China’s Anticorruption Campaign through Online Feedback. Public Administration Review79 (4): 500–513.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
