A common explanation for electoral victories is that the winning candidate adopted issue positions that appealed to voters, implying that citizens’ choices are based on policy preferences. However, it is not straightforward to determine the causal direction between citizens’ issue preferences and their party choice. An alternative possibility, strongly supported by prior research, is that voters adopt the positions of the parties they vote for to rationalize their votes. The 2017 French presidential election offers a unique opportunity to address that question, as it saw the victory of a candidate who was not backed by one of the established parties. Using panel data, we show that policy preferences measured prior to Macron’s emergence as a candidate led voters with a particular bundle of preferences to support him. We conclude that policy preferences clearly do matter to vote choice and that this effect is most visible when a new party emerges.
AchenCHBartelsLM (2016) Democracy for Realists: Why Elections do not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AardalBvan WijnenP (2005) Issue Voting. In: ThomassenJ (ed.) The European Voter: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.192–206.
3.
AdamsJFMerrillSIIIGrofmanB (2005) A Unified Theory of Party Competition. A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AngristJDPischkeJS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
AnsolabehereSRoddenJSnyderJM (2008) The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting. American Political Science Review102 (2): 215–232.
6.
BélangerÉLewis-BeckMSChicheJ, et al. (2006) Party, Ideology, and Vote Intentions: Dynamics from the 2002 French Electoral Panel. Political Research Quarterly59 (4): 503–515.
7.
BlaisA (2003) Strategic Voting in the 2002 French Presidential Election. In: Lewis-BeckMS (ed.) The French Voter: Before and After the 2002 Elections. Hampshire: Palgrave, pp.96–109.
8.
BornschierSLachatR (2009) The Evolution of the French Political Space and Party System. West European Politics32 (2): 360–383.
9.
BrodyRAPageBI (1972) Comment: The Assessment of Policy Voting. American Political Science Review66: 450–458.
10.
BullockJG (2011) Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate. American Political Science Review105 (3): 496–515.
11.
CampbellAConversePMillerW, et al. (1960) The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
12.
ConverseP (1964) The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In: ApterDE (ed.) Ideology and Discontent. London: Free Press of Glencoe, pp.206–261.
13.
ConversePEPierceR (1986) Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA; London: Belknap Press.
14.
DaltonRJ (1984) Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies. The Journal of Politics46 (1): 264–284.
15.
DaltonRJWattenbergMP (2002) Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
DassonnevilleR (2018) Electoral Volatility and Parties’ Ideological Responsiveness. European Journal of Political Research57 (4): 808–828.
17.
DassonnevilleRHoogheM (2018) Indifference and ALIENATION: Diverging Dimensions of Electoral Dealignment in Europe. Acta Politica53 (1): 1–23.
18.
De SioLLachatR (2020) Making Sense of Party Strategy Innovation: Challenge to Ideology and Conflict-Mobilisation as Dimensions of Party Competition. West European Politics43 (3): 688–719.
19.
De VriesCEHoboltSB (2012)When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs. European Union Politics13 (2): 246–268.
20.
De VriesCEHoboltSB (2020) Political Entrepreneurs: The Rise of Challenger Parties in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
22.
DruckmanJNPetersonESlothuusR (2013) How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation. American Political Science Review107 (1): 57–79.
23.
DurovicA (2019) The French Elections of 2017: Shaking the Disease?West European Politics42 (7): 1487–1503.
24.
EvansJIvaldiG (2018) The 2017 French Presidential Elections. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
FranklinMNMackieTTValenH (1992) Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
GougouFPersicoS (2017) A New Party System in the Making? The 2017 French Presidential Election. French Politics15 (3): 303–321.
28.
IvaldiG (2018) Populisme et choix électoral: Analyse des effets des attitudes populistes sur l’orientation du vote. Revue française de science politique68 (5): 847–872.
29.
KnutsenOKumlinS (2005) Value Orientations and Party Choice. In: ThomassenJ (ed.) The European Voter: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.125–166.
30.
KönigPDWaldvogelT (2018) Ni gauche ni droite? Positioning the Candidates in the 2017 French Presidential Election. French Politics19: 281–303.
31.
LachatRMichelE (2020) Campaigning in an Unprecedented Election: Issue Competition in the French 2017 Presidential Election. West European Politics43 (3): 565–586.
32.
LenzG (2009) Learning and Opinion Change, not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science53 (4): 821–837.
33.
LenzG (2012) Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Lewis-BeckMSChlarsonK (2002) Party, Ideology, Institutions and the 1995 French Presidential Election. British Journal of Political Science32 (3): 489–512.
35.
Lewis-BeckMSNadeauRBélangerÉ (2012) French Presidential Elections. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
LodgeMTaberCS (2013) The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
ManinBPrzeworskiAStokesSC (1999) Elections and Representation. In: PrzeworskiAStokesSCManinB (eds) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.29–54.
38.
MényY (2017) A Tale of Party Primaries and Outsider Candidates: The 2017 French Presidential Election. French Politics15 (3): 265–278.
39.
MillerWEShanksJM (1996) The New American Voter.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
PitkinHF (1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
41.
PowellGB (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
Van der StraetenKLaslierJFBlaisA (2013) Vote Au Pluriel: How People Vote When Offered to Vote Under Different Rules. PS: Political Science & Politics46 (2): 324–328.
43.
WalczakAVan der BrugWDe VriesCE (2012) Long- and Short-Term Determinants of Party Preferences: Inter-Generational Differences in Western and East Central Europe. Electoral studies31 (2): 273–284.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
