Do fake news and what some have labeled our post-truth predicament represent a new and deadly challenge to the epistemic presuppositions of the public sphere? While many commentators have invoked Hannah Arendt to help answer this question, I argue that Arendt is the wrong place to look. Instead, I suggest that, on one hand, deliberative democracy and Jürgen Habermas’ idea of democracy as truth-tracking offer a more helpful framework for assessing and combating the threat of fake news and, on the other hand, Bernard Williams’ virtues of accuracy identify the citizen virtues necessary to counteract fake news. The virtues of accuracy, I contend, can be facilitated and encouraged through structural and regulatory features in the public sphere. We are indeed seeing a recalibration and significant push back on fake news due to both structural changes and ordinary citizens becoming more epistemically responsible consumers of digital information.
AchenCHBartelsLM (2016) Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AllcottHGentzkowM (2017) Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives31 (2): 211–236.
3.
ArendtH (1954) Truth and Politics. In: ArendtH (ed.) Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. London: Penguin Books, pp.227–264.
4.
BächtigerAParkinsonJ (2018) Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Toward a New Deliberative Quality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BeinerR (2008) Rereading “Truth and Politics.”Philosophy and Social Criticism34: 123–136.
6.
BrennanJ (2017) Against Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
ChambersS (2017) Balancing Epistemic Quality and Equal Participation in a System Approach to Deliberative Democracy. Social Epistemology31 (3): 266–276.
8.
CuratoNHammondMMinJB (2019) Power in Deliberative Democracy: Norms, Forums Systems. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
DryzekJ (2017) The Forum, the System and the Polity: Three Varieties of Democratic Theory. Political Theory45 (5): 610–636.
10.
DryzekJBächtigerAChambersS, et al. (2019) The Crisis of Democracy and the Science of Deliberation. Science363 (6432): 1144–1146.
11.
FishkinJ (2018) Democracy When the People Are Thinking: Revitalizing Our Politics Through Public Deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
GastilJBlackLWMoscovitzK (2008) Ideology, Attitude Change, and Deliberation in Small Face-To Groups. Political Communication25: 23–46.
13.
GastilJKnoblochKRReedyJ, et al. (2018) Assessing the Electoral Impact of the 2010 Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review. American Politics Research46 (3): 543–563.
GuessALyonsBMontgomeryJM, et al. (2018a) Fake News, Facebook Ads, and Misconceptions: Assessing Information Quality in the 2018 U.S. Midterm Election Campaign. Available at: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~bnyhan/fake-news-2018.pdf (accessed 2 December 2019).
GuessANaglerJTuckerJ (2019) Less Than You Think: Prevalence and Predictors of Fake News Dissemination on Face Book. Science Advances5 (1): eaau4586.
18.
HabermasJ (2005) Truth and Justification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
HabermasJ (2009) Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still have an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. In: HabermasJ (ed.) Europe the Faltering Project. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp.138–183.
20.
HertzbergB (2019) Chains of Persuasion: A Framework for Religion in Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LandemoreH (2017) Beyond the Fact of Disagreement? The Epistemic Turn in Deliberative Democracy. Social Epistemology31 (3): 277–295.
27.
LazerDBaumMBeklerY, et al. (2018) The Science of Fake News. Science359 (6380): 1094–1096.
28.
LodgeMTaberCS (2013) The Rationalizing Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
McIntyreL (2018) Post-Truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
MansbridgeJBohmanJChambersS, et al. (2012) A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy. In: ParkinsonJMansbridgeJ (eds) Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–26.
31.
MasonL (2016) A Cross Cutting Calm: How Social Sorting Drives Affective Polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly80 (S1): 351–377.
PennycookGRandDG (2018a) Lazy, Not Biased: Susceptibility to Partisan Fake News Is Better Explained by Lack of Reasoning Than by Motivated Reasoning. Cognition188: 39–50.
37.
PennycookGRandDG (2018b) Fighting Misinformation on Social Media Using Crowdsourced Judgments of News Source Quality. PNAS116 (7): 2521–2526.
38.
PersilyN (2017) Can Democracy Survive the Internet?Journal of Democracy28 (2): 63–76.
WilliamsB (2002) Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
WilliamsB (2005) Truth Politics and Self-Deception. In: WilliamsB (ed.) In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp.154–165.
