This article introduces the notion of ‘transnational representation’ to refer to claims by national parliamentarians on behalf of citizens of other national constituencies. Thus defined, transnational representation combines insights from the constructivist turn in the theory of democratic representation with a renewed focus on national parliaments as the prime institutional sites of representation. A focus on transnational representation advances the debate on democratic representation in an age of internationalisation in two ways. First, it allows for a systematic and comparative analysis of how representation in parliaments responds to internationalisation. Second, it suggests a new perspective on the possible alignment of political representation with the range of affected interests. We illustrate these two claims with a case study of transnational representation in parliamentary debates on the European Financial Stability Facility and by outlining an agenda for further research.
AngevineS (2017) Representing All Women: An Analysis of Congress, Foreign Policy, and the Boundaries of Women’s Surrogate Representation. Political Research Quarterly70 (1): 98–110.
2.
AuelKRozenbergOTaceaA (2015) Fighting Back? And, If So, How? Measuring Parliamentary Strength and Activity in EU Affairs. In: NeuholdCRozenbergOSmithJC, et al. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.60–93.
3.
BakkerRDe VriesCEdwardsE, et al. (2015) Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File. Party Politics21 (1): 143–152.
4.
BellamyRCastiglioneD (2013) Three Models of Democracy, Political Community and Representation in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy20 (2): 206–223.
5.
CastiglioneDWarrenME (2013) A New Ecology of Democratic Representation? Eight Theoretical Issues. Intrasformazione: Rivista di Storia delle Idee2 (2): 155–172.
6.
ClosaCMaatschA (2014) In a Spirit of Solidarity? Justifying the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) in National Parliamentary Debates. Journal of Common Market Studies52 (2): 826–842.
7.
CrumBFossumJE (2009) The Multilevel Parliamentary Field: A Framework for Theorizing Representative Democracy in the EU. European Political Science Review1 (2): 249–271.
8.
DahlR (1999) Can International Organizations be Democratic? A Skeptic’s View. In: ShapiroIHacker-CordònC (eds) Democracy’s Edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.19–32.
9.
De WildeP (2012) The Plural Representative Space: How Mass Media and National Parliaments Stimulate Pluralism through Competition. In: KrögerSFriedrichD (eds) The Challenge of Democratic Representation in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.117–134.
10.
De WildeP (2013) Representative Claims Analysis: Theory Meets Method. Journal of European Public Policy20 (2): 278–294.
11.
De WildePJunkWMPalmtagT (2015) Accountability and Opposition to Globalization in International Assemblies. European Journal of International Relations22 (4): 823–846.
12.
De WildePKoopmansRZürnM (2014) The Political Sociology of Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism: Representative Claims Analysis. Discussion Paper SP IV 2014–102, Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. Available at: https://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2014/iv14-102.pdf (accessed 15 February 2019).
13.
DischL (2011) Towards a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation. American Political Science Review105 (1): 100–114.
14.
DischL (2015) The ‘Constructivist Turn’ in Democratic Representation: A Normative Dead-End?Constellations22 (4): 487–499.
15.
EriksenEOFossumJE (2002) Democracy through Strong Publics in the European Union?Journal of Common Market Studies40 (3): 401–424.
16.
ErzeelS (2012) Women’s Substantive Representation in the Belgian Chamber of Representatives: Testing the Added Value of a ‘Claims-making’ Approach. World Political Science Review8 (1): 28–47.
17.
FalkRStraussA (2001) Toward Global Parliament. Foreign Affairs80 (1): 212–220.
18.
FasoneCLupoN (2016) Conclusion: Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Framework of a Euro-national Parliamentary System. In: LupoNFasoneC (eds) Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Composite European Constitution. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp.345–360.
19.
FligsteinN (2009) Who Are the Europeans and How Does This Matter for Politics? In: CheckelJTKatzensteinP (eds) European Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.132–166.
20.
HeldD (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21.
KinskiL (2018) Whom to Represent? National Parliamentary Representation during the Eurozone Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy25 (3): 346–368.
22.
Koenig-ArchibugiM (2017) How to Diagnose Democratic Deficits in Global Politics: The Use of the ‘All-affected Principle’. International Theory9 (2): 171–202.
23.
KoopmansRStathamP (1999) Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches. Mobilization: An International Quarterly4 (2): 203–221.
24.
KoopmansRStathamP (2010) The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
KrippendorffK (2013) Content Analysis. An Introduction to its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing.
26.
KuyperJW (2016) Systemic Representation: Democracy, Deliberation, and Nonelectoral Representatives. American Political Science Review110 (2): 308–324.
27.
LombardMSnyder-DuchKBrackenCC (2002) Content Analysis in Mass Communication Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability. Human Communication Research28 (4): 587–604.
28.
LordCTamvakiD (2013) The Politics of Justification? Applying the ‘Discourse Quality Index’ to the Study of the European Parliament. European Political Science Review5 (1): 27–54.
29.
MaatschA (2016) Drivers of Political Parties’ Voting Behaviour in European Economic Governance: The Ultimate Decline of the Economic Cleavage?West European Politics39 (4): 648–666.
30.
MarkovitsE (2006) The Trouble with Being Earnest: Deliberative Democracy and the Sincerity Norm. Journal of Political Philosophy14 (3): 249–269.
31.
MontanaroL (2018) Who Elected Oxfam? A Democratic Defense of Self-appointed Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
NäsströmS (2003) What Globalization Overshadows. Political Theory31 (6): 808–834.
RehfeldA (2018) On Representing. Journal of Political Philosophy26 (2): 216–239.
35.
SawardM (2006) The Representative Claim. Contemporary Political Theory5 (3): 297–318.
36.
SawardM (2010) The Representative Claim. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
SchmittHToygürI (2016) European Parliament Elections of May 2014: Driven by National Politics or EU Policy Making?Politics and Governance4 (1): 167–181.
38.
SteffekJKisslingCNanzP (2007) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit?New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
UrbinatiN (2006) Representative Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
UrbinatiNWarrenME (2008) The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science11 (1): 387–412.
41.
WeilerJ (1996) European Neo-Constitutionalism: In Search of Foundations for the European Constitutional Order. Political Studies44 (3): 517–533.
42.
WendlerF (2016) Debating Europe in National Parliaments. Public Justification and Political Polarization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
WinzenT (2017) Constitutional Preferences and Parliamentary Reform: Explaining National Parliaments’ Adaptation to European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
