Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article addresses a foundational question of political representation: how do representatives act for those they represent? In a shift away from analyses of individual representatives’ attitudes and behaviour, we identify Women’s Parliamentary Organizations as potential critical sites and critical actors for women’s substantive representation. Offering one of the most in-depth studies to date, our illustrative case is the long-standing UK Parliamentary Labour Party’s Women’s Committee. With a unique data set, and using both quantitative and qualitative methods, we systematically examine the Parliamentary Labour Party’s Women’s Committee efforts to substantively represent women over more than a decade. We find that the Committee sustains its focus on a small number of women’s issues and interacts with party leadership to advance women’s interests in a feminist direction. Our findings capture processes of political change, a frequently under-explored stage in studies of substantive representation. We close by identifying the potential for comparative research in this area.

Keywords

women’s substantive representation critical mass critical actors political change gender and politics feminizing women’s parliamentary organizations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahrens

(2016) The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality in the European Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs 69 (4): 778–793.

Annesley

Gains

(2010) The Core Executive: Gender, Power and Change. Political Studies 58 (5): 909–929.

Barnes

(2016) Gendering Legislative Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Beckwith

(2007) Numbers and Newness: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women. Canadian Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 27–49.

Beckwith

(2013) The Comparative Study of Women’s Movements. In: Waylen

Celis

Kantola

et al . (eds) The Oxford Handbook on Gender and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 411–436.

Carroll

(2001) Representing Women: Women State Legislators as Agents of Policy-Related Change. In: Carroll

(ed.) The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp.3–21.

Celis

Childs

(2012) The Substantive Representation of Women. Political Studies 60 (1): 213–225.

Celis

Childs

(2018) Good Representatives and Good Representation. Political Science & Politics 51 (2): 314–317.

Celis

Childs

Curtin

(2016) Specialized Parliamentary Bodies and the Quality of Women’s Substantive Representation’. Parliamentary Affairs 69 (4): 812–829.

10.

Celis

Childs

Kantola

et al . (2014) Constituting Women’s Interests through Representative Claims. Politics & Gender 10 (2): 149–174.

11.

Celis

Childs

Kantola

et al . (2008) Rethinking Women’s Substantive Representation. Representation 44 (2): 99–110.

12.

Childs

(2004) New Labour’s Women Mps. London: Routledge.

13.

Childs

(2013) Negotiating Gendered Institutions. Politics & Gender 9 (2): 127–151.

14.

Childs

(2016) The Good Parliament. Bristol: Bristol University. Available at: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/news/2016/july/20%20Jul%20Prof%20Sarah%20Childs%20The%20Good%20Parliament%20report.pdf

15.

Childs

Krook

(2006) Should Feminists Give Up on Critical Mass? A Contingent Yes. Politics & Gender 2 (4): 522–530.

16.

Childs

Krook

(2009) Analyzing Women’s Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors. Government and Opposition 44 (2): 125–145.

17.

Childs

Krook

(2012) Labels and Mandates in the UK. In: Franceschet

Krook

Piscopo

(eds) The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.89–102.

18.

Childs

Lovenduski

(2013) Representation. In: Waylen

Celis

Kantola

et al . (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.489–513.

19.

Childs

Withey

. (2006) A Simple Case of Feminist Cause and Feminist Effect? Reducing the VAT on Sanitary Products in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs 59 (1).

20.

Dahlerup

(1988) From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics. Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–298.

21.

Dovi

(2007) The Good Representative. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

22.

Dovi

(2010) Measuring representation: Rethinking the role of exclusion. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2–5 September.

23.

Franceschet

(2017) Disentangling Informality and Informal Rules. In: Waylen

(ed.) Gender and Informal Institutions. London: Rowman & Littlefield, pp.115–135.

24.

Gains

Lowndes

(2014) How is Institutional Formation Gendered, and Does it Make a Difference? Politics & Gender 10 (4): 524–548.

25.

Hammond

Mulhollan

Stevens

Jr (1985) Informal Congressional Caucuses and Agenda Setting. Western Political Quarterly 38 (4): 583–605.

26.

Harder

MMS

(2017) Assessing the Impact of Parliamentary Design: The Case of the Danish Committee on Gender Equality. Scandinavian Political Studies 40 (4): 434–456.

27.

Holli

Harder

MMS

(2016) Towards a Dual Approach. Parliamentary Affairs 69 (4): 794–811.

28.

Lovenduski

(2005) Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

29.

Mackay

(2010) Conclusion. In: Krook

Mackay

(eds) Gender, Politics and Institutions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.181–196.

30.

Mackay

(2014) Nested Newness, Institutional Innovation, and the Gendered Limits of Change. Politics & Gender 10 (4): 549–571.

31.

Mackay

Waylen

(2009) Feminist Institutionalism. Politics & Gender 5 (2): 237–237.

32.

Manbsridge

(1999) Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? The Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–657.

33.

Mansbridge

(2016, June 9) Honourary Doctorate Lecture. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh.

34.

McBride

Mazur

(2012) Gender Machineries Worldwide. World Development Report: World Bank, pp.92.

35.

Mitchell-Mahoney

(2013) Women as Party Members: What Women’s Caucus Creation Tells Us. In: American Political Science Association annual conference.

36.

Oliver

(2005) Women’s Legislative Caucuses. National Conference of State Legislatures. LegisBrief 13 (29): 1–2.

37.

Phillips

(1995) The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

38.

Piscopo

(2014) IPSA Annual Meeting. Prepared for presentation at the International Political Science Association World Congress Montreal, Canada 19–25 July 2014.

39.

Saward

(2010) The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

40.

Sawer

(2015) Beyond Numbers. Australasian Parliamentary Review 30: 105–122.

41.

Sawer

Turner

(2016) Specialised Parliamentary Bodies. Parliamentary Affairs 69 (4): 763–777.

42.

Waylen

(2010) Gendered Institutionalist Analysis. In: Krook

Mackay

(eds) Gender, Politics and Institutions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.147–162.

43.

Waylen

(2017) Analysing Gender in Informal Institutions. In: Waylen

(ed.) Gender and Informal Institutions. London: Rowman & Littlefield, pp.1–21.

44.

Weldon

(2002) Beyond Bodies. The Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1153–1174.

45.

Weldon

(2014) Using Statistical Methods to Study Institutions. Politics & Gender 10 (4): 661–672.

46.

Williams

(1998) Voice, Trust and Memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.16 MB

The Grit in the Oyster? Women’s Parliamentary Organizations and the Substantive Representation of Women

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material