By extending the time-tested reward–punishment hypothesis in economic voting, this article argues that rational voters hold incumbents accountable for the macroeconomic policies they pursue rather than purely for the economic climate that prevails under their tenure. Building on this premise, I first put forward a theory where business cycle fluctuations realign relative fiscal preferences among income groups. This theory’s implications predict that the aggregate electoral response to fiscal decisions evolves in a counter-cyclical fashion. Using quarterly measures of vote intention shares of incumbent parties in the United Kingdom, I provide time-series evidence from a set of error correction models supporting this proposition: at times of low unemployment, the electorate punishes profligate incumbents; in deteriorating labour market conditions, however, they reward expansionary policies. The immediate electoral impact is non-significant across the models, and most of the estimated effect is spread out across subsequent quarters.
AlesinaAArdagnaS (1998) Tales of Fiscal Adjustment. Economic Policy27: 487–545.
2.
ArceneauxK (2006) The Federal Face of Voting: Are Elected Officials Held Accountable for the Functions Relevant to Their Office?Political Psychology27 (5): 731–754.
3.
BakerAGreeneKE (2011) The Latin American Left’s Mandate Free-Market Policies and Issue Voting in New Democracies. World Politics63 (1): 43–77.
4.
BellucciPLewis-BeckMS (2011) A Stable Popularity Function? Cross-National Analysis. European Journal of Political Research50 (2): 190–211.
5.
BerlemannMEnkelmannSKuhlenkasperT (2015) Unraveling the Relationship between Presidential Approval and the State of the Economy: A Multidimensional Semiparametric Approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics30: 468–486.
6.
BirchSGottfriedGLodgeG (2013) Divided Democracy: Political Inequality in the UK and Why It Matters. London: Institute for Public Policy Research, pp.1–32.
BravoAEliasM (1987) Modelos Politico-Economicos En Espana. Revista del Instituto de Estudios Economicos2: 189–213.
9.
BrenderADrazenA (2008) How Do Budget Deficits and Economic Growth Affect Reelection Prospects? Evidence from a Large Panel of Countries. American Economic Review98 (5): 2203–2220.
10.
CampbellAConversePMillerWet al. (1960) The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
CarlitzRde RenzioPKrafchikWet al. (2008) Budget Transparency around the World: Results from the 2008 Open Budget Survey. OECD Journal on Budgeting9 (2): 1–17.
12.
CarrollCDSlacalekJTokuokaK (2014) The Distribution of Wealth and the MPC: Implications of New European Data. American Economic Review104 (5): 107–111.
13.
CrossleyTFO’DeaC (2010) The Wealth and Saving of UK Families on the Eve of the Crisis. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies, pp.1–90.
14.
CusackTIversenTRehmP (2006) Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution. Oxford Review of Economic Policy22 (3): 365–389.
15.
CusackTR (1997) Partisan Politics and Public Finance: Changes in Public Spending in the Industrialized Democracies, 1955–1989. Public Choice91 (3): 375–395.
16.
CusackTR (2001) Partisanship in the Setting and Coordination of Fiscal and Monetary Policies. European Journal of Political Research40 (1): 93–115.
17.
De BoefSKeeleL (2008) Taking Time Seriously. American Journal of Political Science52 (1): 184–200.
18.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
19.
DuchRMStevensonRT (2008) The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results, Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21.
EvansGPickupM (2010) Reversing the Causal Arrow: The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions in the 2000–2004 U.S. Presidential Election Cycle. Journal of Politics72 (4): 1236–1251.
22.
EvansGTilleyJ (2012) How Parties Shape Class Politics: Explaining the Decline of the Class Basis of Party Support. British Journal of Political Science42: 137–161.
23.
FreyBSSchneiderF (1980) Popularity Functions: The Case of the US and West Germany. In: WhiteleyP (ed.) Models of Political Economy. London; Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, pp.47–84.
24.
GeorgeALBennettA (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Belfer Center Studies in International Security). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
25.
GoodhartCAEBhansaliRJ (1970) Political Economy. Political Studies18 (1): 43–106.
26.
GreenJHoboltSB (2008) Owning the Issue Agenda: Party Strategies and Vote Choices in British Elections. Electoral Studies27 (3): 460–476.
27.
HainmuellerJMummoloJXuY (2016) How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Muliplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice. Working Paper, 13February2017. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2739221 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2739221 (accessed 6 April 2017).
28.
HallPASoskiceDW (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
HarrisonMJMarshM (1998) A Re-Examination of an Irish Popularity Function. Public Choice94 (3): 367–383.
30.
HealyALenzGS (2014) Substituting the End for the Whole: Why Voters Respond Primarily to the Election-Year Economy. American Journal of Political Science58 (1): 31–47.
31.
HellwigTT (2001) Interdependence, Government Constraints, and Economic Voting. Journal of Politics63 (4): 1141–1162.
32.
HibbsDA (1977) Political-Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review71 (4): 1467–1487.
33.
HoboltSBTilleyJ (2014) Who’s in Charge? How Voters Attribute Responsibility in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies47 (6): 795–819.
34.
IlleraRMMulas-GranadosC (2008) What Makes Fiscal Consolidations Last? A Survival Analysis of Budget Cuts in Europe (1960–2004). Public Choice134 (3): 147–161.
IversenTSoskiceD (2006) Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More than Others. American Political Science Review100 (2): 165–181.
37.
KramerGH (1971) Short-Term Fluctuations in US Voting Behavior, 1896–1964. American Political Science Review65 (1): 131–143.
38.
KwonHY (2010) Unemployment, Partisan Issue Ownership, and Vote Switching Evidence from South Korea. Party Politics16 (4): 497–521.
39.
KwonHYPontussonJ (2010) Globalization, Labour Power and Partisan Politics Revisited. Socio-Economic Review8 (2): 251–281.
40.
LafayJ-D (1984) Political Change and Stability of the Popularity Function: The French General Election of 1981. Political Behavior6 (4): 333–352.
41.
Lewis-BeckMS (1988) Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
42.
Lewis-BeckMSBellucciP (1982) Economic Influences on Legislative Elections in Multiparty Systems: France and Italy. Political Behavior4 (1): 93–107.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2007) Economic Models of Voting. In: RussellJDKlingemannH-D (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.520–530.
45.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2008) The Economic Vote in Transitional Democracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties18 (3): 303–323.
46.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2009) American Voter to Economic Voter: Evolution of an Idea. Electoral Studies28 (4): 625–631.
47.
Lewis-BeckMSMartiniNFKiewietDR (2013) The Nature of Economic Perceptions in Mass Publics. Electoral Studies32 (3): 524–528.
48.
MaresI (2003) The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
MeltzerAHRichardSF (1981) A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy89 (5): 914–927.
50.
MukoyamaTSahinA (2006) Costs of Business Cycles for Unskilled Workers. Journal of Monetary Economics53 (8): 1909–1923.
51.
Mulas-GranadosC (2006) Economics, Politics and Budgets: The Political Economy of Fiscal Consolidations in Europe. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
52.
NadeauRNiemiRGYoshinakaA (2002) A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context across Time and Nations. Electoral Studies21 (4): 539–542.
53.
NannestadPPaldamM (1994) The VP-Function – A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after 25 Years. Public Choice79 (3): 213–245.
54.
NorpothH (1987) Guns and Butter and Government Popularity in Britain. American Political Science Review81 (3): 949–959.
PacekACRadcliffB (1995) Economic Voting and the Welfare-State – A Cross-National Analysis. Journal of Politics57 (1): 44–61.
58.
PalmerHDWhittenGD (2011) Through Thick and Thin? The Dynamics of Government Support across Income Groups during Economic Crises. Electoral Studies30 (3): 427–437.
59.
PickupM (2010) Better Know Your Dependent Variable: A Multination Analysis of Government Support Measures in Economic Popularity Models. British Journal of Political Science40: 449–468.
60.
PowellGBWhittenGD (1993) A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting – Taking Account of the Political Context. American Journal of Political Science37 (2): 391–414.
61.
SandersD (2010) The Real Economy and the Perceived Economy in Popularity Functions: How Much Do Voters Need to Know? A Study of British Data, 1974–97. Electoral Studies19 (2): 275–294.
62.
SattlerTBrandtPTFreemanJR (2010) Democratic Accountability in Open Economies. Quarterly Journal of Political Science5 (1): 71–97.
63.
SchultzKA (1995) The Politics of the Political Business-Cycle. British Journal of Political Science25: 79–99.
64.
VeigaFJVeigaLG (2004) The Determinants of Vote Intentions in Portugal. Public Choice118 (3): 341–364.
65.
VerbaSBradyHSchlozmanKL (2004) Why No Confiscation in America? Political Participation, Political Parties and the Median Voter Theorem. Chicago, IL: American Political Science Association.
66.
VisserJ (2013) Database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts in 34 Countries between 1960 and 2014. University of Amsterdam. Available at: http://uva-aias.net/en/ictwss (accessed 6 April 2017).
67.
Von HagenJHallettAHStrauchR (2002) Budgetary Consolidation in Europe: Quality, Economic Conditions, and Persistence. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies16 (4): 512–535.
68.
WalczakAvan der BrugWde VriesC (2010) Values, Ideology and Party Choice in Europe. Conference Paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Munster, 2010.
69.
WhiteleyPF (1986) Macroeconomic Performance and Government Popularity in Britain – The Short Run Dynamics. European Journal of Political Research14 (1): 45–61.
70.
WiesehomeierNDoyleD (2013) Discontent and the Left Turn in Latin America. Political Science Research and Methods1 (2): 201–222.
71.
WlezienC (1995) The Public as Thermostat – Dynamics of Preferences for Spending. American Journal of Political Science39 (4): 981–1000.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
