This article puts the second-order theory for regional elections to the test. Not by analysing voting behaviour but with the use of campaign data. The assumption that regional campaigns are overshadowed by national issues was verified by analysing the campaign tweets of Flemish politicians who ran for the regional or national parliament in the simultaneous elections of 2014. No proof was found for a hierarchy of electoral levels but politicians clearly mix up both levels in their tweets when elections coincide. The extent to which candidates mix up governmental levels can be explained by the incumbency past of the candidates, their regionalist ideology, and the political experience of the candidates.
AlbaR (1987) Interpreting the Parameters of Log-Linear Models. Sociological Methods and Research16 (1): 45–77.
2.
AndersonC (2006) Economic Voting and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Individual-Level Analysis. American Journal of Political Science50 (2): 449–463.
3.
BoutecaNDevosC (2014) The Process of Rescaling Interests in the Belgian Context: The Impact of Regional Governmental Strength. Territory, Politics, Governance2 (3): 287–302.
4.
BroersmaMGrahamT (2012) Social Media as Beat: Tweets as a News Source during the 2010 British and Dutch Elections. Journalism Practice6 (3): 403–419.
5.
BrunsA (2012) How Long Is a Tweet? Mapping Dynamic Conversation Networks on Twitter using Gawk and Gephi. Information, Communication & Society15 (9): 1323–1351.
6.
BrunsABurgessJ (2011) #Ausvotes: How Twitter Covered the 2010 Australian Federal Elections. Communication, Politics & Culture4 (2): 37–56.
7.
BudgeIFarlieD (1983) Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London: George Allen & Unwin.
8.
CampbellJE (1986) Presidential Coattails and Midterm Losses in State Legislative Elections. The American Political Science Review80 (1): 45–63.
9.
CarseyTMWrightGC (1998) State and National Factors in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections. American Journal of Political Science42 (3): 994–1002.
10.
DandoyR (2013) Belgium: Toward a Regionalization of National Elections? In: DandoyRSchakelA (eds) Regional and National Elections in Western Europe: Territoriality of the Vote in Thirteen Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp.47–67.
11.
DandoyRSinardetDLefevereJ (2013) Médias et fédéralisme. Analyse de la couverture médiatique lors des élections regionals de 2009. In: DandoyRMatagneGVan WynsbergheC (eds) Le fédéralisme belge. Enjeux institutionels, acteurs socio-politiques et opinions publiques. Louvain-la_Neuve: Academia-L’Harmattan, pp.179–203.
12.
De VreeseCH (2003) Television Reporting of Second-Order Elections. Journalism Studies4 (2): 183–198.
13.
De VreeseCH (2009) Second-Rate Election Campaigning? An Analysis of Campaign Styles in European Parliamentary Elections. Journal of Political Marketing8: 7–19.
14.
De VreeseCHLaufEPeterJ (2007) The Media and European Parliament Elections: Second-Rate Coverage of a Second-Order Event? In: van der BrugWvan der EijkC (eds) European Elections and Domestic Politics: Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp.116–130.
15.
De WinterLSwyngedouwMDumontP (2006) Party Systems and Electoral Behaviour in Belgium: From Stability to Balkanisation. West European Politics29 (5): 933–956.
DeschouwerK (2009) Towards a Regionalization of Statewide Electoral Trends in Decentralised States? The Case of Belgium and Spain. In: SwendenWMaddensB (eds) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp.31–46.
18.
ErkJSwendenW (2010) Taking Stock during Times of Change. In: ErkJSwendenW (eds) New Directions in Federalism Studies. New York: Routledge, pp.188–206.
19.
FabreEMaddensB (2009) Verkiezingscycli in meerlagige politieke systemen: België in vergelijkend perspectief. Vives beleidspaper n°4, March.
20.
FleissJLevinBPaikMC (2003) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 3rd edn.New York: John Wiley.
21.
GagatekW (2010) Campaigning in the European Parliament Elections. In: GagatekW (ed.) The 2009 Elections to the European Parliament (Country Reports). Florence: European University Institute, pp.13–19.
22.
HellewegS (1979) An Examination of Voter Conceptualizations of the Ideal Political Candidate. Southern Speech Communication Journal44: 373–385.
23.
HoogheLMarksGSchakelA (2010) The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies. London: Routledge.
24.
HoxJ (2010) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications, 2nd edn.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25.
JefferyCHoughD (2006) Devolution and Electoral Politics: Where Does the UK Fit in? In: HoughDJefferyC (eds) Devolution and Electoral Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp.248–256.
26.
JefferyCSchakelA (2013) Are US State Elections ‘Second-Order’ Elections?Paper presented at the PSA Annual Conference, Cardiff, 25–27 March.
27.
KjaerUSteyversK (2014) Second Thoughts on Second-Order: Towards a Second-Tier Model of Local Elections and Voting. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Glasgow, 3–6 September.
28.
KruikemeierS (2014) How Political Candidates Use Twitter and the Impact on Votes. Computers in Human Behavior34: 131–139.
29.
LarssonAOMoeH (2012) Studying Political Microblogging: Twitter Users in the 2010 Swedish Election Campaign. New Media & Society14 (5): 729–747.
30.
MikhaylovSLaverMBenoitK (2012) Coder Reliability and Misclassification in the Human Coding of Party Manifestos. Political Analysis20: 78–91.
31.
PallarésFKeatingM (2003) Regional Electoral Competition: Regional Elections and Party Systems in Spain. European Urban and Regional Studies10 (3): 239–255.
32.
PetrocikJ (1996) Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science40: 825–850.
33.
PieresonJE (1975) Presidential Popularity and Midterm Voting at Different Electoral Levels. American Journal of Political Science19 (4): 683–694.
34.
PitkinH (1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
35.
PutGMaddensB (2013) The Selection of Candidates for Eligible Positions on PR Lists: The Belgian/Flemish Federal Elections 1999–2010. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties23 (1): 49–65.
36.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results. European Journal of Political Research8: 3–44.
37.
RomanovaV (2014) The Principle of Cyclicality of the Second-Order Election Theory for Simultaneous Multi-Level Elections. Politics34 (2): 161–179.
38.
SchakelADandoyR (2013a) Conclusion. Regional Elections in Comparative Perspective. In: DandoyRSchakelA (eds) Regional and National Elections in Western Europe: Territoriality of the Vote in Thirteen Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp.275–299.
39.
SchakelADandoyR (2013b) Introduction. Territoriality of the Vote: A Framework for Analysis. In: DandoyRSchakelA (eds) Regional and National Elections in Western Europe: Territoriality of the Vote in Thirteen Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp.1–26.
SimonDOstromCMarraR (1991) The President, Referendum Voting and Sub-National Elections in the United States. American Political Science Review85: 1177–1192.
42.
StrömbäckJVan AelstP (2013) Why Political Parties Adapt to the Media: Exploring the Fourth Dimension of Mediatization. International Communication Gazette75 (4): 341–358.
43.
SwendenWMaddensB (2009) Introduction. Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe: A Framework for Analysis. In: SwendenWMaddensB (eds) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp.1–30.
44.
TenscherJ (2014) A Matter of Timing? A Study of Regional Election Campaigns in Germany. German Politics23 (1–2): 26–42.
45.
VersmessenE (1995) In the Kingdom of Paradoxes: The Belgian Regional and National Elections ofMay1994. Regional and Federal Studies5 (2): 239–246.
46.
WalgraveSDe SwertK (2007) Where Does Issue Ownership Come from? From the Party or from the Media? Issue-Party Identifications in Belgium, 1991–2005. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12 (1): 37–67.
47.
WattsR (2013) Typologies of Federalism. In: LoughlinJKincaidJSwendenW (eds) Routledge Handbook of Regionalism and Federalism. New York: Routledge, pp.19–33.
