This study explains why people voted differently in the 2009 regional and European elections in Belgium. By comparing loyal voters and voters who split their ticket, the article shows that a part of the electorate is driven by Euro-specific motivations. The proportion of people who truly vote ‘European’ depends on the political context, and more precisely on what parties offer the voters in terms of candidates and issues. However, the European dimension is not the only mechanism that underlies voters’ electoral choices at the European level. In particular, uncertain voters, who lack a clear preference for one party at the national level, are likely to split their ticket between the regional and European elections.
AardalBvan WijnenP (2005) Issue voting. In: ThomassenJ (ed.) The European Voter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 192–213.
2.
AckaertJDe WinterLSwyngedouwM (1996) Belgium: An electorate on the eve of disintegration. In: Van der EijkCFranklinM (eds) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 59–78.
3.
BardiLMairP (2008) The parameters of party systems. Party Politics14(2): 147–166.
4.
BeyersJBursensP (2006) Europa is geen Buitenland. Over de Relatie tussen het Ferderale België en de Europese Unie. Leuven: Acco.
5.
BillietJMaddensBFrognierA-P (2006) Does Belgium (still) exist? Differences in political culture between Flemings and Walloons. West European Politics29(5): 912–932.
BurdenBC (2009) Candidate-driven ticket splitting in the 2000 Japanese elections. Electoral Studies28(1): 33–40.
8.
BurdenBCHelmkeG (2009) The comparative study of split-ticket voting. Electoral Studies28(1): 1–7.
9.
CaramaniD (2006) Is there a European electorate and what does it look like? Evidence from electoral volatility measures, 1976–2004. West European Politics29(1): 1–27.
10.
CarrubaCTimponeRJ (2005) Explaining vote switching across first- and second-order elections: Evidence from Europe. Comparative Political Studies38(3): 260–281.
11.
CostallA (2006) ‘Introspectionism’ and the mythical origins of scientific psychology. Consciousness and Cognition15(4): 634–654.
12.
CurticeJ (1989) The 1989 European election: Protest or green tide. Electoral Studies8(3): 217–230.
13.
DaltonRJMcAllisterIWattenbergMP (2000) The consequences of partisan dealignment. In: DaltonRJWattenbergMP (eds) Parties without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 37–63.
14.
De VriesCEVan der BrugWvan EgmondMH (2011) Individual and contextual variation in EU issue voting: The role of political information. Electoral Studies30(1): 16–28.
15.
De WinterLSwyngedouwMDumontP (2006) Party system(s) and electoral behaviour in Belgium: From stability to Balkanisation. West European Politics29(5): 933–956.
16.
DeschouwerK (2009) The Politics of Belgium: Governing a Divided Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
DeschouwerKVan AsscheM (2008) Hard but hardly relevant: Party-based Euroscepticism in Belgium. In: SzczerbiakATaggartP (eds) Opposing Europe: The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 75–92.
18.
DrieskensEVan HeckeSBursensP (2010) The 2010 Belgian Presidency: Driving in the EU’s Back Seat. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.
19.
ErkJ (2008) Explaining Federalism: State, Society and Congruence in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany and Switzerland. New York: Routledge.
20.
HeathAMcLeanITaylorB (1999) Between first and second order: A comparison of voting behaviour in European and local elections in Britain. European Journal of Political Research35(3): 389–414.
21.
HixSMarshM (2007) Punishment or protest? Understanding European parliament elections. Journal of Politics69(2): 495–510.
22.
HoboltSBSpoonJ-JTilleyJ (2009) A vote against Europe? Explaining defection at the 1999 and 2004 European parliament elections. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 93–115.
23.
HoogheLBakkerRBrigevichA (2010) Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill Expert Surveys on Party Positioning. European Journal of Political Research49(5): 687–703.
24.
IrwinG (1995) Second-order or third-rate? Issues in the campaign for the elections for the European parliament 1994. Electoral Studies14(2): 183–199.
25.
JohnstonRJPattieCJ (2002) Campaigning and split-ticket voting in new electoral systems: The first MMP elections in New Zealand, Scotland and Wales. Electoral Studies21(4): 583–600.
26.
MacDonaldSEListhaugORabinowitzG (1991) Issues and party support in multiparty systems. American Political Science Review85(4): 1107–1131.
27.
MaddensBHajnalI (2002) De al dan niet gesplitste Partijkeuze en de Beleidsthema’s. In: SwyngedouwMBillietJ (eds) De Kiezer heeft zijn Redenen. Leuven: Acco, 57–72.
28.
MarshMMikhaylov S (2008) European Parliament elections as second order national elections: A review of the evidence. URL (accessed 1 October 2011): http://europeangovernance.livingreviews.org.
29.
NisbettREWilsonTD (1977) Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review84(3): 231–232.
30.
PappiRUThurnerPW (2002) Electoral behaviour in a two-vote system: Incentives for ticket splitting in German Bundestag elections. European Journal of Political Research41(2): 207–232.
31.
PedersenMN (1979) The dynamics of European party systems: Changing pattern of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Research7(1): 1–26.
32.
RallingsCTrasherM (2005) Not all ‘second-order’ contests are the same: Turnout and party choice at the concurrent 2004 local and European parliament elections in England. British Journal of Politics & International Relations7(4): 584–597.
33.
ReifK (1984) National electoral cycles and European elections 1979 and 1984. Electoral Studies3(3): 244–255.
34.
ReifK (1997) European elections as member state second-order elections revisited. European Journal of Political Research31(1–2): 115–124.
35.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine second-order national elections – A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research8(1): 3–44.
36.
RohrschneiderRClarkN (2008) Second-order elections versus first-order thinking: How voters perceive the representation process in a multi-layered system of governance. In: Van der EijkCSchmittH (eds) Multi-Level Electoral Systems of the European Union. Mannheim: CONNEX, 137–162.
37.
RosemaM (2004) The Sincere Vote: A Psychological Study of Voting. University of Leiden, Political Science.
38.
SchmittH (2005) The European parliament elections of June 2004: Still second-order?West European Politics28(3): 650–679.
39.
SchoenH (1999) Split-ticket voting in German federal elections, 1953–90: An example of sophisticated balloting?Electoral Politics18(4): 473–496.
40.
ShapiroI (2002) Problems, methods, and theories in the study of politics, or what’s wrong with political science and what to do about it. Political Theory30(4): 596–619.
41.
SteenbergenMRJonesBS (2002) Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science46(1): 218–237.
42.
Van der EijkCFranklinM (1996) The research: Studying elections of 1989 and 1994. In: Van der EijkCFranklinM (ed.) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 33–58.
43.
Van der EijkCFranklinMOppenhuisE (1996) The strategic context: Party choice. In: Van der EijkCFranklinM (eds) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 332–365.
44.
Van HolsteynJJM (1994) Het Woord is aan de Kiezer. Een Beschouwing over Verkiezingen en Stemgedrag aan de Hand van Open Vragen. Leiden: DSWO Press.
45.
Van HolsteynJJMAndewegRB (2010) Demoted leaders and exiled candidates: Disentangling party and person in the voter’s mind. Electoral Studies29(4): 628–635.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
