Most studies of public opinion regarding constitutional change focus on ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ in consolidated democracies, but in comparative terms most institutional change takes place in unstable political contexts. We contend that mass preferences towards institutional choices are likely to differ significantly in turbulent contexts as compared to stable polities. In this article, we consider the issue of public preferences towards proposals for regional decentralisation in the context of post-Soviet Ukraine, a society that has been in the throes of political change for the last decade. Using surveys conducted in war-torn Ukraine in 2014, we find that under conditions of political uncertainty, the institutional preferences of citizens are connected to group identities and ideological orientations rather than instrumental concerns.
BarringtonL (1997) The Geographic Component of Mass Attitudes in Ukraine. Post-Soviet Geography and Economics38 (10): 601–614.
4.
BarringtonL (2002) Examining Rival Theories of Demographic Influences on Political Support: The Power of Regional, Ethnic, and Linguistic Divisions in Ukraine. European Journal of Political Research41 (4): 455–491.
5.
BarringtonLHerronES (2001) Understanding Public Opinion in Post-Communist States: The Effects of Statistical Assumptions on Substantive Results. Europe-Asia Studies53 (4): 573–594.
6.
BirchS (1998) Party System Formation and Voting Behaviour in the Ukrainian Parliamentary Election of 1994. In: KuzioT (ed.) Contemporary Ukraine: Dynamics of Post-Soviet Transformation. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, pp.139–160.
7.
ChaistyPWhitefieldS (2015) Attitudes towards the Environment: Are Post-Communist Societies (Still) Different?Environmental Politics24 (4): 598–616.
8.
ChongD (2000) Rational Lives: Norms and Values in Politics and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
ChudowskyVKuzioT (2003) Does Public Opinion Matter in Ukraine? The Case of Foreign Policy. Communist and Post-Communist Studies36 (3): 273–290.
10.
CollinK (2015) Do Referenda Resolve or Perpetuate Contention. In: NorrisPFrankRWMartinez i ComaF (eds) Contentious Elections: From Ballots to Barricades. London: Routledge, pp.111–130.
CraumerPRClemJI (1999) Ukraine’s Emerging Electoral Geography: A Regional Analysis of the 1998 Parliamentary Elections. Post-Soviet Geography and Economics40 (1): 1–26.
HerzogATuckerJ (2010) The Dynamics of Support: The Winners-Losers Gap in Attitudes toward EU Membership in Post-Communist Countries. European Political Science Review2 (2): 235–267.
20.
HesliV (1995) Public Support for the Devolution of Power in Ukraine: Regional Patterns. Europe-Asia Studies47 (1): 91–121.
21.
HoboltSBWratilC (2015) Public Opinion and the Crisis: The Dynamics of Support for the Euro. Journal of European Public Policy22 (2): 238–256.
22.
HoogheLMarksG (2004) Does Identity or Economic Rationality Drive Public Opinion on European Integration. PS Online: Political Science and Politics37 (3): 415–420.
23.
KubicekP (2000) Regional Polarization in Ukraine: Public Opinion, Voting, and Legislative Behaviour. Europe-Asia Studies52 (2): 273–294.
24.
KuzioT (1998) Ukraine: State and Nation Building. London: Routledge.
25.
KuzioT (2015) Competing Nationalisms, Euromaidan, and the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism15 (1): 157–169.
26.
LaitinD (1998) Identity in Formation: The Russian-Speaking Populations in the near Abroad. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
LeeSYMac GintyR (2012) Context and Post-Conflict Referenda. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics18: 43–64.
28.
LijphartA (1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29.
McLarenLM (2006) Identity, Interests and Attitudes to European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
MarshallMG (2016) Major Episodes of Political Violence (MEPV) and Conflict Regions, 1946-2015 [online]. Center for Systemic Peace, 25May. Available at: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/MEPVcodebook2015.pdf (accessed 18 October 2016).
MarshallMGGurrTR (2014) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2013 [online]. Center for Systemic Peace. Available at: http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm (accessed 24 April 2015).
MovchanVGiucciRRyzhenkovM (2014) Ukrainian Exports to Russia: Sector and Regional Exposure (Technical Note Series [TN/03/2014]) [online]. Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting German Advisory Group. Available at: http://www.beratergruppe-ukraine.de/download/TN/TN_03_2014_en.pdf (accessed 22 September 2015).
36.
NadeauRMartinPBlaisA (1999) Attitudes towards Risk-Taking and Individual Choice in the Quebec Referendum on Sovereignty. British Journal of Political Science29 (3): 523–539.
37.
NegrettoGL (2014) Making Constitutions: Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
O’LoughlinJToalGKolosovV (2016) The Rise and Fall of ‘Novorossiya’: Examining Support for a Separatist Geopolitical Imaginary in Southeast Ukraine [online]. Post-Soviet Affairs: 1–21. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2016.1146452 (accessed 15 October 2016).
PiriePS (1996) National Identity and Politics in Southern and Eastern Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies48 (7): 1079–1104.
41.
PogrebinskiyM (2015) Russians in Ukraine: Before and after Euromaidan. In: Pikulicka-WilczewskaASakwaR (eds) Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing, pp.90–99.
Razumkov Centre (2007) Sociological Poll: Would You like to Have Your Region Separated from Ukraine and Joined Another State (Regional Distribution) [online]. Razumkov Centre. Available at: http://www.razumkov.org.ua/eng/poll.php?poll_id=318 (accessed 22 September 2015).
44.
RohrschneiderRWhitefieldS (2004) Support for Foreign Ownership and Integration in Eastern Europe: Economic Interests, Ideological Commitments and Democratic Context. Comparative Political Studies37 (3): 313–339.
45.
RoseRMishlerWHaerpferC (1998) Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
46.
SasseG (2010) The Role of Regionalism. Journal of Democracy21 (3): 99–106.
47.
ShlyakhovaE (2009) Decentralization in Ukraine: A Danger of Disintegration?Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
48.
ShulmanS (2004) The Contours of Civic and Ethnic National Identification in Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies56 (1): 34–56.
49.
ShulmanS (2005) National Identity and Public Support for Political and Economic Reform in Ukraine. Slavic Review64 (1): 59–87.
50.
SiuneKSvenssonP (1993) The Danes and the Maastricht Treaty: The Danish EC Referendum of June 1992. Electoral Studies12 (2): 99–111.
51.
SnidermanPMBrodyRATetlockPE (1991) Reasoning and Choice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
TuckerJAPacekACBerinskyAC (2002) Transitional Winners and Losers: Attitudes Toward EU Membership in Post-Communist Countries. American Journal of Political Science46 (3): 557–571.
WenzelJPBowlerSLanoueDJ (2000) Citizen Opinion and Constitutional Choices: The Case of the UK. Political Behavior22 (3): 241–265.
59.
WhitefieldS (2006) Mind the Representation Gap: Explaining Differences in Public Views of Representation in Post-Communist Democracies. Comparative Political Studies40 (6): 733–758.
60.
WolczukK (2002) Catching up with ‘Europe’? Constitutional Debates on the Territorial-Administrative Model in Independent Ukraine. Regional & Federal Studies12 (2): 65–88.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
