Political interest is a crucial precursor to political engagement, but little is known about how to stimulate greater interest. The article explores the role social motives have in generating interest. A laboratory experiment is used in which it is possible to manipulate beliefs about the social rewards of political engagement as well as external efficacy beliefs. Across two types of measures for political interest (self-reports and revealed preferences), connecting political engagement with social rewards led to substantial increases in political interest. Moreover, these effects were particularly strong among individuals with low levels of external efficacy. Ultimately, the data provide clear evidence that political interest can be positively stimulated with social rewards mobilisation techniques and that it is rooted in beliefs about the potential motives pursuable through politics. The paper concludes with a discussion of the broader implications of these results for studies of political participation and mobilisation efforts.
AddonizioEGreenDPGlaserJM (2007) Putting the Party Back into Politics: An Experiment Testing Whether Election Day Festivals Increase Voter Turnout. PS: Political Science & Politics4: 721–727.
2.
BaumeisterRFLearMR (1995) The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological Bulletin117 (3): 497–529.
3.
BennettSE (1986) Apathy in America 1960–1984: Causes & Consequences of Citizen Political Indifference. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Publishers, Inc.
4.
BlalockHMJr (1979) Social Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
BolsenT (2013) A Light Bulb Goes On: Norms, Rhetoric, and Actions for the Public Good. Political Behavior35: 1–20.
CampbellAConversePEMillerWE. (1960) The American Voter. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
8.
CampbellDE (2006) Why We Vote: How Schools and Communities Shape our Civic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
DahlRA (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
DavenportTCGerberASGreenDP. (2010) The Enduring Effects of Social Pressure: Tracking Campaign Experiments over a Series of Elections. Political Behavior32: 423–430.
11.
DawesCTLoewenPJFowlerJH (2011) Social Preferences and Political Participation. The Journal of Politics73 (3): 845–856.
12.
Delli CarpiniMXKeeterS (1996) What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
DennyKDoyleO (2008) Political Interest, Cognitive Ability and Personality: Determinants of Voter Turnout in Britain. British Journal of Political Science38 (2): 291–310.
14.
DruckmanJNKamCD (2011) Students as Experimental Participants. In: DruckmanJNGreenDPKuklinskiJH. (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.41–57.
15.
EcclesJSWigfieldA (2002) Motivational Beliefs: Values, and Goals. Annual Review of Psychology53: 109–132.
16.
EnosRDFowlerAVavreckL (2014) Increasing Inequality: The Effect of GOTV Mobilization on the Composition of the Electorate. The Journal of Politics76 (1): 273–288.
17.
FishbeinMAjzenI (2010) Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Taylor & Francis Press.
18.
FitzgeraldJCurtisKA (2012) Partisan Discord in the Family and Political Engagement: A Comparative Behavioral Analysis. The Journal of Politics74: 129–141.
19.
GerberASGreenDP (2000) The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. The American Political Science Review94 (3): 653–663.
20.
GerberASRogersT (2009) Descriptive Social Norms and Motivation to Vote: Everybody’s Voting and So Should You. The Journal of Politics71 (1): 178–191.
21.
GerberASGreenDPLarimerC (2008) Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Larger Scale Field Experiment. American Political Science Review102 (1): 33–48.
22.
GerberASGreenDPLarimerC (2010) An Experiment Testing the Relative Effectiveness of Encouraging Voter Participation by Inducing Feelings of Pride and Shame. Political Behavior32: 409–422.
23.
HullemanCSGodesOHendricksBL. (2010) Enhancing Interest and Performance with a Utility Value Intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology102 (4): 880–895.
24.
KamCD (2012) Risk Attitudes and Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science56 (4): 817–836.
25.
LazarsfeldPFBerelsonBRGaudetH (1968) The People’s Choice, 3rd edn.New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
LodgeMTaberCS (2006) Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 755–769. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3694247
27.
McDermottR (2011) Internal and External Validity. In: DruckmanJNGreenDPKuklinskiJH. (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.27–41.
28.
MilbrathLWGoelML (1977) Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics?2nd edn.Chicago, IL: Rand McNally Publishing Company.
29.
MillerJM (2013) The Motivational Underpinnings of Political Participation. In: La RajaRJ (ed.) New Directions in American Politics. New York: Routledge, pp.209–232.
30.
MillerJMKrosnickJA (2004) Threat as a Motivator of Political Activism: A Field Experiment. Political Psychology25 (4): 507–523.
31.
MullinixKJLeeperTJDruckmanJNFreeseJ (forthcoming) The Generalizability of Survey Experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science.
32.
NickersonDW (2008) Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments. The American Political Science Review102 (1): 49–57.
33.
PanagopoulosC (2010) Affect, Social Pressure, and Prosocial Motivation: Field Experimental Evidence of the Mobilizing Effects of Pride, Shame, and Publicizing Voting Behavior. Political Behavior32: 369–386.
34.
PanagopoulosC (2013a) Extrinsic Rewards, Intrinsic Motivations, and Voting. The Journal of Politics75 (1): 266–280.
35.
PanagopoulosC (2013b) Positive Social Pressure and Prosocial Motivation: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment on Voter Mobilization. Political Psychology34 (2): 265–275.
36.
PanagopoulosC (2014a) I’ve Got My Eyes on You: Implicit Social-Pressure Cues and Prosocial Behavior. Political Psychology35 (1): 23–33.
37.
PanagopoulosC (2014b) Watchful Eyes: Implicit Observability Cues and Voting. Evolution and Human Behavior35: 279–284.
38.
PanagopoulosCLarimerCWCondonM (2014) Social Pressure, Descriptive Norms: and Voter Mobilization. Political Behavior36 (2): 451–469.
39.
PriorM (2010) You’ve Either Got it Or You Don’t? The Stability of Political Interest over the Life Cycle. The Journal of Politics72 (3): 747–766.
40.
RenningerKASuS (2012) Interest and Its Development. In: RyanRM (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.167–190.
41.
RosenstoneSJHansenJM (1993) Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Longman.
42.
RyanRMDeciEL (2000) Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist55 (1): 68–78.
43.
SchattschneiderEE (1960) The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
44.
ShaniD (2009) On the Origins of Political Interest. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
45.
SinclairB (2012) The Social Citizen: Peer Networks in Political Behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
VerbaSSchlozmanKLBradyHE (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
ZukinCAndolinaMKeeterS. (2006) A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
