Abstract
Indigenous peoples’ movements have posed a considerable challenge for governments in calling for a renegotiation of their relationship with the state. In the case of Aotearoa New Zealand, growing Māori interest in developing a more equal partnership with the state through constitutional reform has been met by government attempts to fit Māori into the political status quo without fundamentally challenging the foundational principles of the settler constitutional order. Despite increasing reference to ‘partnership’ and ‘self-determination’, such ‘solutions’ have remained state-determined not self-determined. To illustrate this contention, the paper focuses on the New Zealand Public Health and Disability Bill, which the Labour-Alliance government intended to be a sensitive and significant response to Māori calls for greater power-sharing. In providing only ‘bicultural’ add-ons to general legislation, however, this ‘solution’ provoked rathe R than pacified furthe R debate as to how Māori–state relations should be or could be negotiated in the twenty-first century.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
