Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

To guide the prevention of policing in persons experiencing homelessness and mental illness, we examined police interactions in this population by combining data from At Home/Chez Soi and Montreal police databases (N= 454). We explored the types, initiators, locations, and mental health/judicial outcomes of interactions over four years, identifying sub-groups using latent class analysis and then comparing sociodemographic and psychosocial variables between groups. Four groups emerged: few, mainly as a suspect, diverse, and frequent and diverse interactions. The characteristics of participants with more suspect interactions are described. Grouping suggested the policing of behaviors associated with homelessness and underreporting of victimization.

Keywords

Police homelessness mental illness justice involvement

Long-Form Abstract

Police services have become highly involved in interventions with vulnerable populations over the years, notably with persons experiencing homelessness and mental illness. In order to best allocate resources for preventive interventions with this population, we aimed to examine patterns of police interactions in people experiencing both homelessness and mental illness and their associated psychosocial correlates. Combining data from the At Home/Chez Soi study and Montreal police databases (N = 454), we explored the types, initiators, locations, and mental health or judicial outcomes of police interactions in this population over a 4-year period. Further, we used latent class analysis to identify groups characterised by the frequency of contacts and distinguishing interactions as a suspect, victim, or person in crisis. We compared sociodemographic and psychosocial variables between emerging groups. Sixty-two percent of participants had at least one interaction, most often as suspects. Four groups emerged: few interactions, interactions mainly as a suspect, diverse interactions, and frequent and diverse interactions. Participants with more suspect interactions were more likely to be younger men with a substance use disorder, poorer community functioning, and no past stable employment. Grouping of interaction patterns suggested the policing of behaviors associated with homelessness and underreporting of victimization. We discuss policy and service delivery implications.

Introduction

Homelessness is increasingly recognized as a public health issue as people who are homeless or unstably housed have higher rates of emergency-service use, physical and mental health problems, and premature mortality (Fazel et al., 2014; Sleet and Francescutti, 2021). Amongst the homeless population in high-income countries, 76.2% live with at least one mental disorder such as alcohol or drug-abuse disorders, major depression, or schizophrenia spectrum disorder (Gutwinski et al., 2021). According to recent Canadian data, people who have experienced unsheltered homelessness (i.e., having lived in a homeless shelter, a makeshift shelter, or in outdoor spaces) and hidden homelessness (‘couch-surfing’ - temporarily staying with friends, family, or others) are three times more likely to report fair or poor mental health than those who have experienced neither (28% vs 9%) (Uppal, 2022).

In addition to significant healthcare needs, people who experience both homelessness and mental illness have a high lifetime prevalence of arrests, convictions, and incarcerations (Roy et al., 2014). Disproportionate criminal justice involvement (CJI) in this group is partly attributed to the “criminalization of homelessness”, that is the penalization of behaviors associated with homelessness including loitering, trespassing, and survival-driven behaviors (i.e., panhandling, sex work, theft, etc.) (Chesnay et al., 2013; Robinson, 2017). Furthermore, people with a mental illness are reportedly twice as likely as those without a disorder to be arrested for similar offenses (Charette et al., 2014). The paucity of community mental health alternatives to institutionalization are thought to contribute to this judicialization of mental illness, with police services increasingly responding to mental health crises (Marcus and Stergiopoulos, 2022; Roesch and Goossens, 2022). People with a mental illness, and in particular women and people experiencing concomitant homelessness, are also more likely to be victims of crimes than the general population, creating additional contact with police services (Desmarais et al., 2014; Gutwinski et al., 2021; Marr et al., 2023). Police interactions among homeless persons with mental illness may have numerous deleterious effects such as further CJI, fragmented health care, trauma, and re-victimization. People with a mental illness also report positive experiences where police facilitated transfers to health services during a crisis or responded to victimization (Brink et al., 2011; Livingston et al., 2014).

A recent Canadian study examined encounters between police and people experiencing mental illness and homelessness (Kouyoumdjian et al., 2019). Among people with a mental illness, the odds of any police interaction within a 3-month window were 47% higher for homeless than stably housed people (Kouyoumdjian et al., 2019). Interactions included incidents of victimization, mental health crises, threatened or attempted suicide, and suspicion of offending. Some Canadian research has also employed multilevel modelling specifically to identify predictors of criminal convictions in this population (Parpouchi et al., 2021). Moreover, the predictors of specific CJI trajectories (i.e., “Multiple Disturbances” and “Non-violent Frequent User”), have also been studied in this population (Roy, Crocker, Nicholls, Latimer & Isaak, 2016b). However, the current literature does not reflect the characteristics of more common policing interactions – such as contact for noncriminal and criminal reasons, crisis calls, or ticketing – which precede arrest and may be partly influenced by different individual factors (Parpouchi et al., 2021). In addition to identifying such risk factors and thus early-intervention targets for all persons experiencing homeless and mental illness, distinguishing between patterns of police interactions could help delineate sub-groups of persons with particular risks, needs, and opportunities for the prevention of CJI.

In the present study, we thus aimed to retrospectively: (1) describe the nature and outcome of police interactions with people experiencing homelessness and mental illness; (2) model heterogeneity and identify patterns of interactions as a suspect, victim, or person in crisis; and (3) identify the psychosocial correlates associated with such patterns.

Methods

This study examined participants from the Canadian At Home/Chez Soi randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Housing First (Goering et al., 2011), recruited between 2009 and 2011 in Montreal. Eligibility criteria for the trial included being absolutely homeless or precariously housed, at least 18 years old, and having a diagnosis of mental illness, with or without a substance use disorder. Mental illness was defined as a psychotic disorder, mood disorder with psychotic features, major depressive episode, manic or hypomanic episode, panic disorder or posttraumatic stress disorder, as evaluated using the DSM-IV criteria on the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Lecrubier et al., 1997). Additional details on the trial, including descriptions for scales included in this study, are available through the registered protocol (Goering et al., 2011). The present study was approved by the appropriate institutional research ethics board, including additional approval for the use of administrative police data. All participants provided signed informed consent for interviews and data access.

Participants

While 469 participants were recruited in Montreal, 454 were included in the present analyses; one participant did not consent to administrative justice data collection, two participants’ police files were irretrievable, and 12 participants passed away over the study period.

Variables of interest

Sociodemographic characteristics were self-reported at baseline through an interviewer-administered questionnaire designed for the study. Variables included: gender (all individuals identified as either man or woman), age, ethnicity (coded as White, Aboriginal, or other), past stable employment (i.e., has worked at least 1 year in the past), high school completion, and lifetime homelessness (duration in months).

Police interactions were identified through the Montreal Police Service’s administrative databases between October 2007 and March 2013. A research assistant coded information about each participant from multiple police databases (i.e., including both dispatch data and internal record management systems) using an online platform developed for this study. For each participant, interactions were extracted from 2 years prior to trial enrollment to 2 years of follow-up. Interactions were categorized based on the participant’s status as identified in reports, that is as a suspect, victim, or person in crisis (e.g., psychotic symptoms, suicidality, physically unwell). Interactions where the status did not fit these categories (e.g., witness, reported as missing) were excluded (n = 79). For each interaction, the date, location, initiator(s) of the police call, judicial outcomes (e.g., warning, arrest, charges), and mental health outcomes (e.g., suicidality, psychological intervention team) were extracted. Multiple outcomes per interaction were reported throughout reports and taken into account for the present study.

Mental health characteristics, including diagnoses, suicidality, and drug and alcohol use disorders, were evaluated by trained interviewers using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview at screening (Lecrubier et al., 1997) and corroborated by medical files. Severity of psychiatric symptoms in the past month was assessed at baseline by way of the 14 self-reported items on the Modified Colorado Symptom Index (MCSI) (Conrad et al., 2001). Severity of substance use problems was measured at baseline using the 16-item Global Assessment of Individual Needs – Substance problem Scale (GAIN SPS) (Dennis et al., 2006). Impulsivity was measured at the 6-month interview using the self-reported Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11) (Patton et al., 1995). Item scores were prorated for missing items. Adverse childhood experiences (ACE) were measured at the 18-months interview using the Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire (Felitti et al., 1998), which includes 10 childhood trauma items coded dichotomously; the total number of types of ACEs was computed.

Quality of life was measured at baseline using the self-reported Quality of Life Index (QoLI20) (Lehman, 1996), designed for use with people living with severe and persistent mental illnesses. The 20-item scale comprises seven subjective indicators (i.e., living situation, everyday activities, family, social relationships, finances, safety, and satisfaction with life in general) and four objective indicators (i.e., everyday activities, enough money, family contacts and contacts with friends).

Community integration was measured at baseline using the Community Integration Scale–Psychological Integration and Sense of Belonging subscale (CIS-P) (Aubry and Myner, 1996). Specifically adapted for the trial (Patterson et al., 2014), the subscale assesses sense of belonging in one’s neighborhood through four items rated on a five-point Likert scale.

Community functioning was rated by an interviewer at baseline using the Multnomah Community Ability Scale (MCAS). The MCAS includes 17 items rated on a five-point Likert scale which assess functional ability across four domains: health, adaptation, social, and behavioral (Barker et al., 1994; Dickerson et al., 2003).

Statistical analyses

Using latent class analysis (LCA) in Mplus version 8, we identified groups which presented similar patterns of police interactions (i.e., statistical classes), based on frequency of interactions per subject and three indicator variables computed from the 4-year sum of interactions as suspect, victim, and person in crisis (Winsorized at the 99^th percentile). We tested the plausibility of two-to six-class solutions, accounting for sufficient sample sizes, interpretability of resulting groups, and avoiding nonconvergence (Nylund-Gibson et al., 2023). The best solution was selected based on theoretical interpretation (i.e., so that groups are qualitatively and quantitatively distinct), parsimony (fewer groups preferred) and the following fit indices: the Bayesian Information Criterion (lowest is preferred), entropy (>0.80), and the bootstrapped likelihood ratio test (Nylund et al., 2007). We then assigned individuals to groups that were most consistent with their own patterns of interactions based on their maximum posterior probability estimate and bivariate analyses (chi-square analyses and analyses of variance) (Bolck et al., 2004; Heron et al., 2015; Vermunt, 2017). Sociodemographic analyses were conducted in R software v.2022.07.02 + 576. For all analyses, significance level was set at p < .05.

Results

Sample description

Of the 454 participants, mean duration of lifetime homelessness was 51.7 months (SD = 67.2). Half of participants met diagnostic criteria for a current major depressive episode (50.2%), while 34.8% were living with a psychotic disorder. Furthermore, 34.1% and 49.3% met criteria for alcohol or drug use disorders, respectively. Sample characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the sample.

Characteristics	Total sample (N = 454)
Characteristics	N	%
Gender
Men	306	67.4%
Women	148	32.6%
Age at enrollment (years)	M = 43.9	SD = 10.5
Race
White	344	75.7%
Aboriginal^a	9	1.9%
Other^b	101	22.3%
High school completion	233	51.5%
Lifetime homelessness (months)	Mean = 51.7, Median = 24	SD = 67.2
Diagnoses^c
Psychotic disorder	158	34.8%
Mood disorder with psychotic features	24	5.3%
Major depressive episode	228	50.2%
Manic or hypomanic episode	18	3.9%
Panic disorder	71	15.6%
Post-traumatic stress disorder	66	14.5%
Alcohol dependence or abuse	155	34.1%
Drug dependence or abuse	224	49.3%

^aThe term Aboriginal was used at the time of this study but has generally been replaced with Indigenous in Canada. Here, the term Aboriginal refers to First Nations, Métis, and Inuit people who originally inhabited the land that is now known as Canada, as well as indigenous peoples from other countries living in Canada.

^bOther includes black, East Asian, Indian Caribbean, Latin American, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Southeast Asian, and mixed ethnicity.

^cParticipants could have more than one diagnosis.

Types of policing interactions

Over the 4-year period of the study, 284 (62.6%) participants had at least one police-reported interaction, cumulating 1190 police interactions as suspects (77.5%; M = 2.6/person), 170 as victims (11.1%; M = 0.4/person), and 176 as a person in crisis (11.5%; M = 0.4/person). Of people with at least one interaction, 50% had at least one contact as a suspect, 23.6% as a victim, and 18.9% as a person in crisis. Participants without any police interactions were significantly older, identified more often as women, reported higher levels of high school completion, had experienced homelessness for shorter durations, and were less likely to have a diagnosis of psychotic disorder, alcohol abuse, or substance abuse (p < .01).

As depicted in Table 2, suspect interactions were most often initiated by police (45.0%) and took place in outdoor public spaces (52.2%). They were most often resolved by an arrest (49.9%) or ticket (36.1%). Participants were considered aggressive in only 16.4% of suspect interactions. Two-thirds of victim interactions were initiated by participants themselves and most took place in private residences (37.1%) or outdoor public spaces (28.8%). Participants involved in victim interactions were often transported or referred to a hospital (24.1%) and emergency responders were called in 21.8% of situations. For interactions where participants were in crisis, there was no clear pattern for contact initiator, although bystanders and participants initiated contacts in 16.5% and 15.3% of cases, respectively. A third of crisis interactions (36.3%) took place in outdoor public spaces and another third (32.4%) in private residences. Transportation or referral of the participant to a hospital (80.1%) or mental health service in the community (10.8%) were the most frequent outcomes. Participants were believed to be at suicide risk in 32.4% of crisis interactions and emergency responders were called in 65.3% of these cases.

Table 2.

Type and characteristics of police interactions.

Variable	As a suspect (n = 1190)		As a victim (n = 170)		As a person in crisis (n = 176)
Variable	N	%	N	%	N	%
Contact initiator
Friend or relative	36	3.0	7	4.1	12	6.8
Business owner	97	8.2	3	1.8	13	7.4
Bystander	125	10.5	23	13.5	29	16.5
Health care services or hospital	15	1.2	6	3.6	18	10.2
Emergency response	7	0.6	0	0	12	6.8
Police officer	535	45.0	8	4.7	22	12.5
Participant themself	26	2.2	106	62.4	27	15.3
Neighbor	27	2.3	4	2.4	13	7.4
Other^a	243	20.4	7	4.1	26	14.8
Location
Outdoor public space	621	52.2	49	28.8	64	36.4
Indoor public space	198	16.6	4	2.4	29	16.5
Business	173	14.5	5	2.9	9	5.1
Private residence	108	9.1	63	37.1	57	32.4
Hospital or mental health/addictions services	17	1.4	3	1.8	2	1.1
Shelter	6	0.5	4	2.4	4	2.3
Police station	5	0.4	31	18.2	3	1.7
Unknown or other^b	62	5.2	11	6.5	5	2.8
Outcome
Transportation/referral to hospital	37	3.1	41	24.1	141	80.1
Transportation/referral to shelter	14	1.2	8	4.7	7	4.0
Transportation/referral to AHCS^c	2	0.2	3	1.8	4	2.3
Transportation/referral to mental health services	16	1.3	28	16.5	19	10.8
Verbal/written warning	47	4.0	0	0	1	0.6
Ticket issued	430	36.1	0	0	6	3.4
Asked to leave location	119	10.0	0	0	3	1.7
Arrested	594	49.9	2	1.2	0	0
Mental health crisis outcomes
Participant believed to be suicidal	11	0.9	1	0.6	57	32.4
Participant believed to be aggressive	195	16.4	3	1.8	49	27.8
Emergency response called	41	3.5	37	21.8	115	65.3
Psychological intervention police team called	12	1.0	1	0.6	24	13.6

^aOther contact initiators include victim (if other than participant), security personnel, public transport personnel, shelter services, and other public institutions.

^bOther locations includes public transport, other public institutions or unknown as a rating from police officers.

^cAHCS, At Home/Chez Soi team.

Groups of policing interactions

LCA fit indices suggested a four-class model was most appropriate among two-to six-class models based on recommended guidelines and parsimony (see Table 3). Figure 1 describes police interactions for the four distinct groups. The largest class (n = 304, 67.0%) represents “few interactions”, with a median of zero interactions as a suspect and generally no interactions as a victim or as a person in crisis. The second class (n = 76, 16.7%) represents “interactions mainly as suspect”, with a median of five suspect interactions, and very infrequent other interactions. The third class (n = 47, 10.4%) represents “diverse interactions”, with a median of two suspect interactions and more frequent interactions as victim and person in crisis relative to the first two groups (median = 1). Finally, the smallest class (n = 27, 6%) represents “frequent and diverse interactions”, with a high frequency of suspect interactions (median = 17), one interaction as victim, and one interaction as person in crisis. Thus, the “interactions mainly as suspect” and “frequent and diverse interactions” groups include a higher number of suspect interactions, whereas “diverse interactions” and “frequent and diverse interactions” groups are the only groups to include interactions as a victim or person in crisis.

Table 3.

Latent-class analysis model fit statistics.

Model fit indicator	2-Class	3-Class	4-Class	5-Class	6-Class
BIC^a	3420.957	3211.528	3171.291	3154.614	3159.119
Entropy	0.934	0.830	0.809	0.797	0.799
Size of classes	380	314	304	276	276
	74	103	76	92	93
		37	47	43	40
			27	29	21
				14	13
					11
BLRT^b	p < .001	p < .001	p < .001	p < .001	No convergence

^aBIC, Bayesian Information Criterion.

^bBLRT, Bootstrapped Likelihood Ratio Test.

Figure 1.

Police interactions by group and status of participants. Note. Box plot displaying the number of each type of police interaction over the 4-year follow-up per class. Boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR), and dots represent outliers (beyond 1.5 × IQR).

Groups differed significantly on some sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics (Table 4). There was a higher proportion of males and younger individuals in groups with a higher number of suspect interactions. In addition, significantly less participants in both suspect-dominant groups reported past stable employment. Participants in such groups also scored lower on MCAS adaptation and behavioral scores. Regarding mental health disorders, these groups reported a significantly higher prevalence and severity of alcohol and drug use disorders. Impulsivity scores were also significantly higher in these groups, with highest scores in the “frequent and diverse interactions” class. Though the “few interactions” class generally followed the same trends as the “diverse interactions” class, the later reported the highest rate of major depressive episodes out of all groups.

Table 4.

Participant characteristics by police interaction group.

	‘Few interactions’	‘Frequent & diverse interactions’	‘Interactions mainly as suspect’	‘Diverse interactions’	Chi-square/F-test	df	p
Men	62.5%	85.2%	85.5%	59.%	19.9	3	<.001
Age (M ± SD years)	45.7 ± 10.3	38.7 ± 10.5	39.8 ± 10.3	42.5 ± 9.8	9.6	3	<.001
Aboriginal^a	1.6%	0%	5.3%	0%			.117
High school completion	53.3%	33.3%	48.7%	55.3%			.214
Past stable employment	82.2%	70.4%	66.7%	80.9%	9.9	3	.019
Lifetime homeless (months)	49.5	69.3	61.2	40.7			.174
Psychotic disorder	31.9%	51.9%	42.1%	31.9%			.088
Major depressive episode	51.3%	33.3%	42.1%	66.0%	9.9	3	.020
Alcohol use disorder	29.0%	59.3%	46.1%	34.0%	16.0	3	.001
Drug use disorder	43.4%	74.1%	67.1%	44.7%	20.1	3	<.001
MCAShealth	19.1	18.7	19.0	18.5			.674
MCAS adaptation	11.0	9.4	9.9	11.3	7.0	3	<.001
MCAS social	16.3	15.4	15.4	16.2			.136
MCAS behavioral	15.6	12.5	13.0	15.5	18.1	3	<.001
CIS-P	10.4	10.7	11.2	11.3			.305
MCSI (past month)	38.2	37.6	37.7	40.9			.421
GAIN SPS (past year)	2.24	3.96	2.99	2.43	8.0	3	<.001
QoLI20	69.0	75.9	72.4	69.4			.346
ACES	4.10	3.81	3.77	4.25			.746
BIS-11	67.1	73.6	69.3	67.8	3.2	3	.022

MCAS, Multnomah Community Ability Scale; CIS-P, Community Integration Scale–Psychological Integration and Sense of Belonging subscale; MCSI, Modified Colorado Severity Index; GAIN SPS, Global Assessment of Individual Needs – Substance problem Scale; QoLI20, Quality of Life Index; ACES, Adverse childhood experiences; BIS-11, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11.

^aAboriginal in the context of this study refers to First Nations, Métis, and Inuit people who originally inhabited the land that is now known as Canada, as well as indigenous people from outside of Canada.

Discussion

Two thirds of people experiencing both homelessness and mental illness in Montreal also experienced police interactions over the 4-year period, comparable to yearly rates reported in Toronto’s At Home/Chez soi cohort which also used administrative data (55.8% in the year prior to the trial and 43%–52% post-trial) (Kouyoumdjian et al., 2019). Participants were most often considered suspects and ultimately arrested in about half of instances. Despite these macro-level trends, interactions showed heterogeneous patterns, especially regarding who initiated contacts and in which location. Modeling police interactions using LCA shed light on four overarching groups, characterized by the nature (i.e., as a suspect, a victim, or a person in crisis) and frequency of interactions.

For suspect-dominant groups (i.e., “interactions mainly as suspect” and “frequent and diverse interactions”), significant correlates included younger age, male gender, substance use disorders, greater severity of substance use problems, and greater impulsivity. In line with the interpretation that suspect interactions lead to more arrests and would be the contacts to lead to CJI, these findings replicate most commonly identified predictors of CJI in this population (Luong et al., 2021; Parpouchi et al., 2021; Roy, Crocker, Nicholls, Latimer, Gozdzik, et al., 2016a; Roy et al., 2014). Present findings therefore further underscore the need to target substance abuse as a criminogenic factor (Luong et al., 2021). Moreover, most suspect interactions resulted in arrests, tickets, or the individual being asked to leave the premises. The vast majority did not involve an aggressive participant. Moreover, 45% of suspect-interactions were initiated by police. Though it was not possible to ascertain exact reasons for individual tickets or arrests, when taken together these results lend support to the criminalization of homeless hypothesis. That is, similarly to previous studies (Kouyoumdjian et al., 2019; Roy, Crocker, Nicholls, Latimer, Gozdzik, et al., 2016a), participants might have been subjected to policing for situations which would be better addressed through psychosocial support, such as breaching parole or probation conditions, using or carrying drugs, committing survival offenses, or disrupting the peace.

Participants in the “diverse interactions” class showed the highest rate of major depressive episodes. This class was characterized by the most interactions as a victim or person in crisis and by non-male respondents. An association has been previously reported between PTSD or violent victimization and subsequent depressive symptoms in women experiencing homelessness and mental illness specifically (Tinland et al., 2018). With regards to psychotic diagnoses, neither having a psychotic disorder nor the severity of symptoms in the past month were significantly different between groups. This is somewhat in line with Parpouchi et al.’s (2021) multilevel modelling of criminal convictions in the Vancouver At Home/Chez Soi cohort, which found no independent association between this harder CJI outcome and individual severe mental disorders.

Most calls related to victimization were initiated by participants themselves while calls for people in crises were evenly distributed across types of initiators. Crisis calls did in fact end in a hospital transfer and/or call to emergency response teams rather than escalating CJI. While only 21% and 24% of interactions as victims resulted in hospital and emergency response help, data did not allow to determine whether these interactions would have required further care. An important finding from the present study is the low rate of victimization reported (23.6%) as compared to other At Home/Chez soi cohorts. For example, 41% of police encounters were related to victimization in the Toronto cohort (Kouyoumdjian et al., 2019) and self-reported national data showed 51% of participants were victimized in the 6 months prior to the trial Roy, Crocker, Nicholls, Latimer, Gozdzik, et al., 2016a). The low prevalence in this study suggests victimization was underreported to authorities. This may be related to mistrust towards police because of previous encounters (especially where individuals have been handcuffed or report being assaulted by an officer) (Krameddine and Silverstone, 2016; Watson et al., 2008; Zakrison et al., 2004), as well as hidden victimization given the low number of interactions reported by bystanders. Of note, both groups characterized by victimization also included high rates of suspect interactions, replicating the well-documented correlation between victimization and CJI in this population (Roy, Crocker, Nicholls, Latimer & Isaak, 2016b; Roy et al., 2014).

Findings from this study hold important implications for reducing barriers to help seeking in people experiencing homelessness and mental illness. Previous research shows that procedural safety determines perceptions of both law enforcement and health and social services in this population, with labelling as vulnerable versus deviant being a key moderator (Roy et al., 2020). While crisis intervention teams and training involving police have aimed to reduce stigmatising attitudes in first responders and improve subsequent CJI and health outcomes, there is mixed-evidence as to their success (Marcus and Stergiopoulos, 2022; Rogers et al., 2019). In contrast, non-police crisis intervention teams show promising results for engaging users with services and reducing CJI (Marcus and Stergiopoulos, 2022). There is a need for further experimental evaluations of these teams (Marcus and Stergiopoulos, 2022), notably to ensure service planning is informed by users’ perspectives and past trauma experiences (Hopper et al., 2010; Spolum et al., 2023). Ultimately, alternative crisis response teams will only be effective in a wider health and social services system which provides timely and continuous access to integrated mental health care (Roesch and Goossens, 2022; Xanthopoulou et al., 2022).

The sensitivity of administrative data on policing compared to self-reports represents a strength of this study. This method enabled an investigation of the heterogeneity in police interactions over a significant period of time, as well as pointed to potential blind-spots in reporting victimization. Nevertheless, interpretation was limited by lack of consistency across reports as to why participants were ticketed or arrested. While previous At Home/Chez Soi analyses have shown good agreement between self-reported and administrative data with respect to court appearances (Lemieux et al., 2017), it is probable that some interactions between police and participants may not have been captured in police reports. Such interactions may include victimization (which was likely underreported in this study) or access to mental health or crisis services not coordinated by police. Second, in accordance with our objectives to model patterns of interactions cross-sectionally, causal mechanisms or confounders were not investigated. Third, we did not investigate the effect of the housing intervention, as it has been reported elsewhere to have no effect on CJI (Kouyoumdjian et al., 2019; Leclair et al., 2019; Luong et al., 2021) or arrests (Aubry et al., 2016; Stergiopoulos et al., 2015). Therefore, while the present study spanned from 2 years prior to 2 years after the trial, the housing intervention is not expected to have had a differential effect than control conditions on police reported outcomes in the present study. Fourth, because the trial selected for absolutely homeless or precariously housed persons from various community services, the sample in this study is less generalizable to persons experiencing hidden homelessness. Finally, there is a need to replicate findings over time, as the implementation of new civilian and police-driven interventions in this population may affect results. Future research should also consider the independent effects of prediction variables longitudinally, notably to model the effects of mental health treatment and social support interventions on CJI.

In conclusion, results from this study add to the evidence base on the frequent interaction of police and people experiencing homelessness and mental illness in Canada, especially as suspects. Results suggest this population may face unnecessary policing related to the behaviors associated with homelessness and underreported victimization. Addressing criminogenic risk factors as well as reducing barriers to help seeking should be prioritized in future evidenced-based policy development and service models for risk management (Leclair et al., 2019).

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

M.L and M.C.L acknowledge financial support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) in the form of Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships. L.R and T.N each acknowledge their CIHR Foundation Grants. We thank Stéfanie Brière with the Montreal Police Service for her expertise and contribution throughout the data extraction process.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was financially supported through a Health Canada contribution to the Mental Health Commission of Canada and by a grant from the CIHR (MOP 136958). This research was undertaken in part, thanks to the funding form the Canada Research Chairs program to A.G.C.

ORCID iDs

Mimosa Luigi

Ashley J Lemieux

Tonia L Nicholls

Anne G Crocker

References

Aubry

Myner

(1996) Community integration and quality of life: a comparison of persons with psychiatric disabilities in housing programs and community residents who are neighbors. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health 15(1): 5–20. DOI: 10.7870/cjcmh-1996-0001.

Aubry

Goering

Veldhuizen

, et al. (2016) A multiple-city RCT of housing first with assertive community treatment for homeless Canadians with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services 67(3): 275–281. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400587.

Barker

Barron

McFarland

, et al. (1994) A community ability scale for chronically mentally ill consumers: Part II. Applications. Community Mental Health Journal 30(5): 459–472. DOI: 10.1007/bf02189063.

Bolck

Croon

Hagenaars

(2004) Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: one-step versus three-step estimators. Political Analysis 12(1): 3–27. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mph001.

Brink

Livingston

Desmarais

, et al. (2011) A study of how people with mental illness perceive and interact with the police. Mental Health Commission of Canada 56–71. Available at: https://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca/wp-content/uploads/drupal/Law_How_People_with_Mental_Illness_Perceive_Interact_Police_Study_ENG_1_0_1.pdf.

Charette

Crocker

Billette

(2014) Police encounters involving citizens with mental illness: use of resources and outcomes. Psychiatric Services 65(4): 511–516. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300053.

Chesnay

Bellot

Sylvestre

M-È

(2013) Taming disorderly people one ticket at a time: the penalization of homelessness in Ontario and British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 55(2): 161–185.

Conrad

Yagelka

Matters

, et al. (2001) Reliability and validity of a modified Colorado symptom index in a national homeless sample. Mental Health Services Research 3(3): 141–153. DOI: 10.1023/a:1011571531303.

Dennis

Chan

Funk

(2006) Development and validation of the GAIN Short Screener (GSS) for internalizing, externalizing and substance use disorders and crime/violence problems among adolescents and adults. American Journal on Addictions 15(Suppl 1): 80–91. DOI: 10.1080/10550490601006055.

10.

Desmarais

Van Dorn

Johnson

, et al. (2014) Community violence perpetration and victimization among adults with mental illnesses. American Journal of Public Health 104(12): 2342–2349. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2013.301680.

11.

Dickerson

Origoni

Pater

, et al. (2003) An expanded version of the Multnomah Community Ability Scale: anchors and interview probes for the assessment of adults with serious mental illness. Community Mental Health Journal 39(2): 131–137. DOI: 10.1023/a:1022610620391.

12.

Fazel

Geddes

Kushel

(2014) The health of homeless people in high-income countries: descriptive epidemiology, health consequences, and clinical and policy recommendations. Lancet 384(9953): 1529–1540. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61132-6.

13.

Felitti

Anda

Nordenberg

, et al. (1998) Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 14(4): 245–258. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00017-8.

14.

Goering

Streiner

Adair

, et al. (2011) The at Home/Chez Soi trial protocol: a pragmatic, multi-site, randomised controlled trial of a Housing First intervention for homeless individuals with mental illness in five Canadian cities. BMJ Open 1(2): e000323. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000323.

15.

Gutwinski

Schreiter

Deutscher

, et al. (2021) The prevalence of mental disorders among homeless people in high-income countries: an updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis. PLoS Medicine 18(8): e1003750. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003750.

16.

Heron

Croudace

Barker

, et al. (2015) A comparison of approaches for assessing covariate effects in latent class analysis. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies 6(4): 420–434.

17.

Hopper

Bassuk

Olivet

(2010) Shelter from the storm: trauma-informed care in homelessness services settings∼!2009-08-20∼!2009-09-28∼!2010-03-22∼! The Open Health Services and Policy Journal 3: 80–100. DOI: 10.2174/1874924001003020080.

18.

Kouyoumdjian

Wang

Mejia-Lancheros

, et al. (2019) Interactions between police and persons who experience homelessness and mental illness in Toronto, Canada: findings from a prospective study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 64(10): 718–725. DOI: 10.1177/0706743719861386.

19.

Krameddine

Silverstone

(2016) Police use of handcuffs in the homeless population leads to long-term negative attitudes within this group. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 44: 81–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.034.

20.

Leclair

Deveaux

Roy

, et al. (2019) The impact of housing first on criminal justice outcomes among homeless people with mental illness: a systematic review. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 64(8): 525–530. DOI: 10.1177/0706743718815902.

21.

Lecrubier

Sheehan

Weiller

, et al. (1997) The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): a short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. European Psychiatry 12: 224–231. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-9338(97)83296-8.

22.

Lehman

(1996) Measures of quality of life among persons with severe and persistent mental disorders. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 31(2): 78–88. DOI: 10.1007/bf00801903.

23.

Lemieux

Roy

Martin

, et al. (2017) Justice involvement among homeless individuals with mental illnesses: are self-report and administrative measures comparable? Evaluation and Program Planning 61: 86–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.12.007.

24.

Livingston

Desmarais

Verdun-Jones

, et al. (2014) Perceptions and experiences of people with mental illness regarding their interactions with police. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 37(4): 334–340. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.003.

25.

Luong

Lachaud

Kouyoumdjian

, et al. (2021) The impact of a Housing First intervention and health-related risk factors on incarceration among people with experiences of homelessness and mental illness in Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health 112(2): 270–279. DOI: 10.17269/s41997-020-00433-z.

26.

Marcus

Stergiopoulos

(2022) Re-examining mental health crisis intervention: a rapid review comparing outcomes across police, co-responder and non-police models. Health and Social Care in the Community 30(5): 1665–1679. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13731.

27.

Marr

Webb

Yee

, et al. (2023) A systematic review of interpersonal violence perpetration and victimization risk examined within single study cohorts, including in relation to mental illness. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 25(0): 130–149. DOI: 10.1177/15248380221145732.

28.

Nylund

Asparouhov

Muthén

(2007) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 14: 535–569. DOI: 10.1080/10705510701575396.

29.

Nylund-Gibson

Garber

Carter

, et al. (2023 Apr) Ten frequently asked questions about latent transition analysis. Psychological Methods 28(2): 284–300, Epub 2022 Jul 14. PMID: 35834194. DOI: 10.1037/met0000486.

30.

Parpouchi

Moniruzzaman

Buxton

, et al. (2021) Multivariable modelling of factors associated with criminal convictions among people experiencing homelessness and serious mental illness: a multi-year study. Scientific Reports 11(1): 16610. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96186-x.

31.

Patterson

Moniruzzaman

Somers

(2014) Community participation and belonging among formerly homeless adults with mental illness after 12 months of Housing First in Vancouver, British Columbia: a randomized controlled trial. Community Mental Health Journal 50(5): 604–611. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-013-9672-9.

32.

Patton

Stanford

Barratt

(1995) Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology 51(6): 768–774. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::aid-jclp2270510607>3.0.co;2-1.

33.

Robinson

(2017) No right to rest: police enforcement patterns and quality of life consequences of the criminalization of homelessness. Urban Affairs Review 55(1): 41–73. DOI: 10.1177/1078087417690833.

34.

Roesch

Goossens

(2022) Chapter 9 - improving police procedures for dealing with mental illness. In: Marques

Paulino

(eds) Police Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 173–188. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816544-7.00009-7.

35.

Rogers

McNiel

Binder

(2019) Effectiveness of police crisis intervention training programs. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 47(4): 414–421. DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003863-19.

36.

Roy

Crocker

Nicholls

, et al. (2014) Criminal behavior and victimization among homeless individuals with severe mental illness: a systematic review. Psychiatric Services 65(6): 739–750. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200515.

37.

Roy

Crocker

Nicholls

, et al. (2016a) Profiles of criminal justice system involvement of mentally ill homeless adults. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 45: 75–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.02.013.

38.

Roy

Crocker

Nicholls

, et al. (2016b) Predictors of criminal justice system trajectories of homeless adults living with mental illness. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 49(Pt A): 75–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.05.013.

39.

Roy

Leclair

Côté

, et al. (2020) Itinérance, santé mentale, justice : expérience et perceptions des utilisateurs de services à Montréal. Criminologie 53(2): 359–383. DOI: 10.7202/1074199ar.

40.

Sleet

Francescutti

(2021) Homelessness and public health: a focus on strategies and solutions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(21): 11660. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111660.

41.

Spolum

Lopez

Watkins

, et al. (2023) Police violence: reducing the harms of policing through public health–informed alternative response programs. American Journal of Public Health 113(S1): S37–S42. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2022.307107.

42.

Stergiopoulos

Hwang

Gozdzik

, et al. (2015) Effect of scattered-site housing using rent supplements and intensive case management on housing stability among homeless adults with mental illness: a randomized trial. JAMA 313(9): 905–915. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.1163.

43.

Tinland

Boyer

Loubière

, et al. (2018) Victimization and posttraumatic stress disorder in homeless women with mental illness are associated with depression, suicide, and quality of life. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 14: 2269–2279. DOI: 10.2147/ndt.S161377.

44.

Uppal

(2022, March) A Portrait of Canadians Who Have Been Homeless. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/75-006-x/2022001/article/00002-eng.htm.

45.

Vermunt

(2017) Latent class modeling with covariates: two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis 18(4): 450–469. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpq025.

46.

Watson

Angell

Morabito

, et al. (2008) Defying negative expectations: dimensions of fair and respectful treatment by police officers as perceived by people with mental illness. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 35(6): 449–457. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-008-0188-5.

47.

Xanthopoulou

Thomas

Dooley

(2022) Subjective experiences of the first response to mental health crises in the community: a qualitative systematic review. BMJ Open 12(2): e055393. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055393.

48.

Zakrison

Hamel

Hwang

(2004). Homeless people's trust and interactions with police and paramedics interactions with police and paramedics. Journal of Urban Health 81(4): 596-605. DOI: 10.1093/jurban/jth143.

Patterns of police interactions with people experiencing homelessness and mental illness

Abstract

Keywords

Long-Form Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Participants

Variables of interest

Statistical analyses

Results

Sample description

Types of policing interactions

Groups of policing interactions

Discussion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

References