The Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) program was first developed to reduce violence in encounters between the police and people with mental illness as well as provide improved access to mental health services. Although there is overwhelming popular support for this intervention, scant empirical evidence of its effectiveness is available—particularly whether the program can reduce the use of force. This investigation seeks to fill this gap in the literature by exploring the factors that influence use of force in encounters involving people with mental illness and evaluating whether CIT can reduce the likelihood of its use.
AbramK. M. (1990). The problem of co-occurring disorders among jail detainees: Anti-social disorder, alcoholism, drug abuse and depression. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 333-345.
2.
AbramsonM. F. (1972). The criminalization of mentally disordered behavior: Possible side effects of a new mental health law. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 23, 101-107.
3.
AdamsK. (2004). What we know about police use of force. In ThurmanQ.ZhaoJ. (Eds.), Contemporary police: Controversies, challenges, and solutions (pp. 187-199). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
4.
AlpertG. P.DunhamR. G. (1999). The force factor. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
5.
AlpertG. P.DunhamR. G.MacDonaldJ. M. (2004). Interactive police-citizen encounters that result in force. Police Quarterly, 7, 475-488.
6.
BittnerE. (1967). Police discretion in the emergency apprehension of mentally ill persons. Social Problems, 14, 278-292.
7.
BorumR.DeaneM. W.SteadmanH. J.MorrisseyJ. (1998). Police perspectives on responding to mentally ill people in crisis: Perceptions of program effectiveness. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 16, 393-405.
8.
Chicago Police Department, Use of Force, GO-02-08-01A. (2003).
9.
Chicago Police Department. (2008). Annual report 2007: A year in review. Retrieved October 10, 2008, from http://www.CityofChicago.org/Police.
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
ComptonM. T.ChienV. H. (2008). Factors related to knowledge retention after crisis intervention training for police officers. Psychiatric Services, 59, 1049-1051.
12.
ComptonM. T.EsterbergM. L.McGeeR.KotwickiR. J.OlivaJ. R. (2006). Crisis intervention team training: Changes in knowledge, attitudes, and stigma related to schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services, 57, 1199-1202.
13.
CordnerG. (2006). People with mental illness. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
14.
Council of State Governments. (2002). Criminal Justice/Mental Health Consensus Project. New York, NY: Council of State Governments.
15.
CrankJ. P. (1997). Understanding police culture. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
16.
EngelR.SilverE. (2001). Policing mentally disordered suspects: A re-examination of the criminalization hypothesis. Criminology, 39, 225-252.
17.
EngelR.SobolJ.WordenR. (2000). Further exploration of the demeanor hypothesis: The interaction effects of suspects’ characteristics and demeanor on police behavior. Justice Quarterly, 17, 235-258.
18.
GarnerJ.MaxwellC.HerauxC. (2002). Characteristics associated with the prevalence and severity of force used by the police. Justice Quarterly, 19, 705-746.
19.
KaminskiR.DiGiovanniC.DownsR. (2004). The use of force between the police and persons with impaired judgment. Police Quarterly, 7, 311-338.
20.
KlingerD. (1996). More on demeanor and arrest in Dade County. Criminology, 34, 61-82.
21.
LawtonB. (2007). Levels of nonlethal force: An examination of individual, situational and contextual factors. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 163-184.
22.
LurigioA.SwartzJ. (2000). Changing the contours of the criminal justice system to meet the needs of persons with serious mental illness. In HorneyJ. (Ed.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 45-108). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
23.
MacDonaldJ. M.ManzP. W.AlpertG. P.DunhamR. G. (2003). Police use of force: Examining the relationship between calls for service and the balance of police force and suspect resistance. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 119-127.
24.
MorabitoM. S. (2007). Horizons of context: Understanding the police decision to arrest people with mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 58, 1582-1587.
ReulandM.SchwarzfeldM.DraperL. (2009). Law enforcement responses to people with mental illnesses: A guide to research-informed policy and practice. New York, NY: Council of State Governments Justice Center.
27.
SkoganW. (2004). Community policing: Common impediments to success. In WycoffL.WycoffM. A. (Eds.), Community policing: The past, present, and future (pp. 159-167). Washington, DC: Annie E. Casey Foundation, Police Executive Research Forum.
28.
StraussG.GlennM.ReddiP.. (2005). Psychiatric disposition of patients brought in by crisis intervention team police officers. Community Mental Health Journal, 41,223-228.
29.
TeplinL. (1984). Criminalizing mental disorder: The comparative arrest rates of the mentally ill. The American Psychologist, 29, 794-803.
30.
TeplinL.PruettN. S. (1992). Police as streetcorner psychiatrists: Managing the mentally ill. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 142, 593-599.
31.
TerrillW.AlpertG. P.DunhamR. G.SmithM. R. (2003). A management tool for evaluating police use of force: An application of the force factor. Police Quarterly, 6, 150-171.
32.
TerrillW.MastrofskiS. D. (2002). Situational and officer-based determinants of police coercion. Justice Quarterly, 19, 215-248.
33.
TerrillW.ReisigM. (2003). Neighborhood context and police use of force. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 291-321.
34.
WatsonA. C.MorabitoM. S.DraineJ.OttatiV. (2008). Improving police response to persons with mental illness: A multi-level conceptualization of CIT. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31, 359-368.
