Process mapping homicide investigations and estimating resource requirements for homicide units: Findings from a case study in the United States

Abstract

A research team worked with a large urban jurisdiction in the southeastern United States, conducted detective interviews, developed process maps, and estimated the work hours associated with various phases of homicide investigations. The investigative process was organized into separate stages and presented as process maps. The average time elapsed for the initial investigative stage was 72.0 hours, while time to complete the second stage was 10.3 days. Plea-bargained cases consumed 12 hours of lead investigator’s time; homicide trials required an additional 13.2 workdays. These workflow maps and workload estimates could be used to help determine staffing allocations in similar agencies.

Keywords

Homicide investigation law enforcement process map

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Addington

(2006) Using national incident-based reporting system murder data to evaluate clearance predictors: a research note. Homicide Studies 10: 140–152.

Alderden

Lavery

(2007) Predicting homicide clearances in Chicago: Investigating disparities in predictors across different types of homicide. Homicide Studies 11: 115–132.

Alexander

Wellford

(2021) Solving homicides: trends, causes and ways to improve. In: Giles

Maguire

Hill

(eds) Handbook of Policing, Communication, and Society: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Borg

Parker

(2001) Mobilizing law in urban areas: the social structure of homicide clearance rates. Law & Society Review 35(2): 435–466.

Brady

King

(2021) Technology and homicide investigations. In: Giles

Maguire

Hill

(eds) Handbook of Policing, Communication, and Society: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Braga

Dusseault

(2017) Can Police Improve Homicide Clearance Rates? Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.

Braga

Turchan

Barao

(2019) The influence of investigative resources on homicide clearances. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 35: 337–364.

Brookman

Innes

(2013) The problem of success: what is a ‘good’ homicide investigation? Policing & Society 23(3): 292–310.

Brookman

Maguire

(2019) What factors influence whether homicide cases are solved? Insights from qualitative research with detectives in Great Britain and the United States. Homicide Studies 23(2): 145–174.

10.

Brookman

Jones

Williams

, et al. (2020) Dead reckoning: unraveling how “homicide” cases travel from crime scene to court using qualitative research methods. Homicide Studies 24(3): 283–306.

11.

Carter

(2013) Homicide process mapping: best practices for increasing homicide clearances. In: NCJ #243969. Washington DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance. U.S. Department of Justice.

12.

Carter

(2016) Effective police homicide investigations: evidence from seven cities with high clearance rates. Homicide Studies 20(2): 150–176.

13.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022a) Death rate maps and graphs. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/deaths.

14.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022b) Suicide data and statistics. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/suicide-data-statistics.html.

15.

Chakraborty

(2020) Reporting and investigating missing persons: a background paper on how to frame the issue. In: NCJRS 255934. Washington DC: Office of Justice Programs.

16.

Chermack

McGarrell

(2004) Problem-solving approaches to homicide: an evaluation of the Indianapolis violence reduction partnership. Criminal Justice Policy Review 15(2): 161–192.

17.

Cozens

Babb

Stefani

(2023) Exploring and developing crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) audits: an iterative process. Crime Prev Community Saf 25: 1–19. DOI: 10.1057/s41300-022-00170-0.

18.

Davies

(2007) Understanding variations in murder clearance rates: the influence of the political environment. Homicide Studies 11(2): 133–150. DOI: 10.1177/1088767907300751.

19.

Death Penalty Information Center (2022) State Studies on Time Costs. Retrieved from: https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/costs/state-studies-on-time-costs.

20.

Eck

(1992) Criminal investigation. In: Cordner

Hale

(eds) What Works in Policing? Operations and Administration Examined. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson, pp. 19–34.

21.

Federal Bureau of Investigations (2022a) Uniform Crime Reports: National Homicide Clearance Rates: 2018. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2018/crime-in-the-u.s.-2018/topic-pages/clearances.

22.

Federal Bureau of Investigations (2022b) Uniform Crime Reports: National Homicide Clearance Rates: 2019. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019.

23.

Gilbert

(1982) A study of the increased rate of unsolved criminal homicide in San Diego, California and its relationship to police investigative effectiveness. American Journal of Police 2: 149–166.

24.

Hawk

Dabney

(2019) Shifting the focus from variables to substantive domains when modeling homicide case outcomes. Homicide Studies 23(2): 93–125. DOI: 10.1177/1088767918807253.

25.

Hough

McCorkle

Harper

(2019) An examination of investigative practices of homicide units in Florida. Homicide Studies 23(2): 175–194.

26.

Innes

(2003) Investigating Murder: Detective Work and the Police Response to Criminal Homicide. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

27.

Keel

(2018) Detective Clues in Homicide Management: A Homicide “Best Practices” Research Project. Washington DC: Federal Bureau of Investigations.

28.

Keel

Jarvis

Muirhead

(2009) An exploratory analysis of factors affecting homicide investigations. Homicide Studies 13: 50–68.

29.

Kuhns

Cambareri

Messer

, et al. (2018) Independent Investigations Of Officer-Involved Shootings: Current Practices and Recommendations From Law Enforcement Leaders in the United States and Canada; Major Cities Chiefs Association https://www.mcca.org.

30.

Kuhns

Messer

(2019) Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department – Homicide Unit Workload Assessment. Charlotte, NC: Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department.

31.

Kuhns

Messer

(2021) Interagency communication: homicide investigations. In: Giles

Maguire

Hill

(eds) Handbook of Policing, Communication, and Society: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

32.

Kuhns

Metcalfe

(2022) Assessing the Public Safety Impact of Limited Prosecutorial Resources in Charlotte, North Carolina. Charlotte, NC: Charlotte Police Foundation.

33.

Liem

Eisner

(2020) From homicide to imprisonment: mapping and understanding the flow of homicide cases. Homicide Studies 24(3): 207–219.

34.

Liem

Krüsselmann

Eisner

(2020) From murder to imprisonment: mapping the flow of homicide cases—a systematic review. Homicide Studies 24(3): 220–241.

35.

Litwin

(2004) A multilevel multivariate analysis of factors affecting homicide clearances. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 41(4): 327–351. DOI: 10.1177/0022427803260269.

36.

LoFaso

(2020) Solving homicides: the influence of neighborhood characteristics and investigator caseload. Criminal Justice Review 45(1): 84–103.

37.

Lum

Koper

(2022) Can we really defund the police? A nine-agency study of police response to calls for service. Police Quarterly 35(3): 255–280.

38.

McGrath

(2021) Secondary traumatic stress, burnout, compassion satisfaction, and perceived organizational trauma readiness in forensic science professionals. Journal of Forensic Sciences 15: 1–12. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14747.

39.

Mendell

(2010) Probing into Cold Cases: A Guide for Investigators. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishing. NCJ 229612.

40.

Miethe

(2012) Estimates of time spent in capital and non-capital murder cases: a statistical analysis of survey data from Clark County defense attorneys. Retrieved from: https://files.deathpenaltyinfo.org/legacy/documents/ClarkNVCostReport.pdf.

41.

Montique

(2019) London domestic homicide review (DHR) case analysis and review of local authorities DHR process. London: Standing Together against Domestic Violence. Retrieved from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ee0be2588f1e349401c832c/t/5f633ee1e0e0be6ec5b858a1/1600339696014/Standing+Together+London+DHR+Review+Report.pdf.

42.

National Institute of Drug Abuse (2022) Overdose death rates. Retrieved from: https://nida.nih.gov/research-topics/trends-statistics/overdose-death-rates.

43.

National Institute of Justice (2016) National And Best Practices for Implementing and Sustaining a Cold Case Investigative Unit. NCJ252016. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

44.

National Institute of Justice (2022) Cold case investigations. Retrieved from: https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/law-enforcement/investigations/cold-case-investigations.

45.

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (2022) Recruitment, hiring and retention. Retrieved from: https://cops.usdoj.gov/recruitment_hiring_and_retention.

46.

Pizarro

Terrill

LoFaso

(2020) The impact of investigation strategies and tactics on homicide clearance. Homicide Studies 24(1): 3–24. DOI: 10.1177/1088767918816741.

47.

Police Executive Research Forum (2018) Promising Strategies for Strengthening Homicide Investigations: Findings and Recommendations from the Bureau of Justice Assistance’s Homicide Investigations Enhancement Training and Technical Assistance Project. Retrieved from: https://www.policeforum.org/assets/homicideinvestigations.pdf.

48.

Puckett

Lundman

(2003) Factors affecting homicide clearances: multivariate analysis of a more complete conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 40: 171–193.

49.

Reeves

Hickman

(2004) Individual State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies with 100 or More Officers. Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics. Washington DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics: U.S. Department of Justice.

50.

Regoeczi

Jarvis

Riedel

(2008) Clearing murders: is it about time? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 45: 142–162.

51.

Ribeiro

Diniz

AMA

(2020) The flow of murder cases through the criminal justice system in a Brazilian City. Homicide Studies 24(3): 242–267.

52.

Riedel

(2008) Homicide arrest clearances: a review of the literature. Sociology Compass 2: 1145–1164.

53.

Riedel

Jarvis

(1999) The decline of arrest clearances for criminal homicide: causes, correlates, and third parties. Criminal Justice Policy Review 9: 279–306.

54.

Roberts

(2007) Predictors of homicide clearance by arrest: an event history analysis of NIBRS incidents. Homicide Studies 11: 82–93.

55.

Roberts

(2015) Adjusting rates of homicide clearance by arrest for investigation difficulty: modeling incident- and jurisdiction-level obstacles. Homicide Studies 19: 273–300.

56.

Roberts

Lyons

(2011) Hispanic victims and homicide clearance by arrest. Homicide Studies 15: 48–73.

57.

Robinson

(2004) Domestic violence MARACs (Multi-Agency risk assessment conferences) for very high-risk victims in cardiff, wales: a process and outcome evaluation. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Amanda-Robinson-12/publication/237442284_Domestic_Violence_MARACs_Multi-Agency_Risk_Assessment_Conferences_for_Very_High-Risk_Victims_in_Cardiff_Wales_A_Process_and_Outcome_Evaluation/links/02e7e5345110dd25be000000/Domestic-Violence-MARACs-Multi-Agency-Risk-Assessment-Conferences-for-Very-High-Risk-Victims-in-Cardiff-Wales-A-Process-and-Outcome-Evaluation.pdf.

58.

Sewell

(1994) The stress of homicide investigators. Death Studies 18(6): 565–582.

59.

Southeastern Police Department (2020) Internal Data Reports provided to the Research Team. Anonymous City, State: Southeastern Police Department.

60.

Southeastern Police Department (2023) Crime Statistical Summary for the End of the Year 2022. Agency Website. (accessed on March 1, 2023).

61.

Southeastern Police Department (n.d.) City Government Website. (accessed on March 1, 2023).

62.

The Urban Institute (2020) State and local finance initiative, police and corrections expenditures. Retrieved from: https://www.urban.org/policy-centers/cross-center-initiatives/state-and-local-finance-initiative/state-and-local-backgrounders/police-and-corrections-expenditures#Question3Police.

63.

Van Patten

Burke

(2001) Critical incident stress and the child homicide investigator. Homicide Studies 5(2): 131–152. DOI: 10.1177/1088767901005002003.

64.

Wellford

Cronin

(2000) Clearing up homicide clearance rates. In: National Institute of Justice Journal. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

65.

Wilson

Dalton

Scheer

, et al. (2010) Police Recruitment and Retention for the New Millennium: The State of Knowledge. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.