Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study contributes to the evidence base of police deferred prosecution schemes aimed at reducing reoffending. Durham Constabulary, UK, introduced Checkpoint, an adult deferred prosecution scheme which targets offenders entering the Criminal Justice System by providing an alternative to a criminal prosecution. Applying theories of deterrence and desistance, this paper describes the randomised control trial findings of 521 offenders randomised between 1 August 2016 and 31 March 2018. The results indicate that the Checkpoint treatment cohort achieved a lower reoffending rate in comparison to the control cohort, on the basis of prevalence (10.3% reduction) and risk of reoffending (30% reduction).

Keywords

Reoffending out of court disposals evidence-based policing offender desistance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

Bonta

Hoge

(1990a) Classification for effective rehabilitation: rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior 17(1): 19–52.

Andrews

Zinger

Hoge

, et al. (1990b) Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology 28: 369–404.

Ashby

(2018) Comparing methods for measuring crime harm/severity. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 12(4): 439–454.

Barnes

(2016) Focusing Police with Algorithms in Durham [Evidence-Based Policing Conference held at the Faculty of Law]. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 13 July.

Beccaria

(1767) An Essay on Crimes and Punishments. London: J. Almon, opposite Burlington-House.

Blakeborough

Pierpoint

(2007) Conditional Cautions: An Examination of the Early Implementation of the Scheme. London: Ministry of Justice.

Brennan

(2015) Centre for Criminology and Criminal Justice report: An experimental evaluation of an adult female triage pilot project for Humberside Police. National Police Library. Available at: http://library.college.police.uk/docs/Police-Female-Triage-Report-Hull-University-2015.pdf (accessed 18 October 2015).

Cohen

(1998) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences (2nd edn). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Criminal Justice Joint Inspection (CJJI) (2011) Exercising discretion: the Gateway to Justice, 1-38. Available at: https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/cjji/wpcontent/uploads/sites/2/2014/04/CJI_20110609.pdf (accessed 20 October 2015).

10.

Debidin

(2009) A Compendium of Research and Analysis on the Offender Assessment System (OASys) 2006-2009. Wellington: Ministry of Justice. Available at: http://nomsintranet.org.uk/roh/official-documents/Debdin%20Compendium%20of%20OASys%20research.pdf (accessed 20th April 2020).

11.

Durlak

DuPre

(2008) Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology 41(3–4): 327.

12.

Edwards

SJL

Lilford

Jackson

, et al. (1998) Ethical issues in the design and conduct of randomised controlled trials. Health Technology Assessment 2(15): 1–146.

13.

Farrall

Calverley

(2005) Understanding Desistance From Crime. London: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

14.

Farrington

(2003) Key results from the first forty years of the Cambridge study in delinquent development. In: Thornberry

Krohn

(eds) Taking Stock of Delinquency: An Overview of Findings from Contemporary Longitudinal Studies. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, pp. 137–183.

15.

Gendreau

Ross

(1981) Correction potency: treatment and deterrence on trial. In: Roesch

Corrrado

(eds) Evaluation and Criminal Justice Policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 29–57.

16.

Gendreau

Little

Goggin

(1996) A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology 34(4): 575–608.

17.

Giordano

Cernovich

Rudolph

(2002) Gender crime and desistance: Towards a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology 107: 990–1064.

18.

Harvey

Shakeshaft

Hetherington

, et al. (2007) The efficacy of diversion and aftercare for adult drug-involved offenders: a summary and methodological review of the outcome literature. Drug and Alcohol Review 26: 379–387.

19.

Higgins

(2017) Mixed Signals for Police Improvement: The Value of your Crime Severity Score May Go Up As Well As Down. Perspectives on Policing, Paper 1, The Police Foundation, London, UK. Available at: http://www.police-foundation.org.uk/2017/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/perspectives_on_policing_paper_1.pdf (accessed 20 April 2020).

20.

Hobbes

(1651 [1994]) Leviathan. In: Curley

(ed.) Leviathan, With Selected Variants From the Latin Edition of 1668 , Indianapolis, IL: Hackett.

21.

Kennedy

Kleiman

Braga

(2017) Beyond deterrence: strategies of focus and fairness. In: Tilley

Sidebottom

. (eds) Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety (2nd edn). London: Routledge.

22.

Klepper

Nagin

(1989) The deterrent effect of perceived certainty and severity of punishment revisited. Criminology 27(4): 721–746.

23.

McDougall

Perry

Clarbour

, et al. (2009) Evaluation of HM Prison Service Enhanced Thinking Skills Programme. Report on the outcomes from a Randomised Control Trial. Ministry of Justice Research Series 3/09. London, UK: Ministry of Justice. Available at: http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/docs/report-on-the-outcomes-from-a-randomised-controlled-trial1.pdf (accessed 28 February 2015).

24.

McNeill

(2002) Beyond what works: How and why do people stop offending?.

25.

Miles

Huberman

(1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

26.

Moore

(2015) A compendium of research and analysis on the offender assessment system (OASys) 2009-2013. Ministry of Justice. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/449357/research-analysis-offender-assessment-system.pdf (accessed 20 April 2020).

27.

Neyroud

(2015a) Rethinking the gateway: using evidence to reform the criminal justice system for victims and people who offend, pp. 1–28. Howard League for Penal Reform, October 2015. Available at: https://d19ylpo4aovc7m.cloudfront.net/fileadmin/howard_league/user/pdf/Publications/Gateway_final_web.pdf (accessed 05 January 2020).

28.

Neyroud

(2015b) Evidence-based triage in prosecuting arrestees: testing an actuarial system of selective targeting. International Criminal Justice Review 25(1): 117–131.

29.

Neyroud

(2017) Learning to Field Test in Policing: Using an analysis of completed randomised controlled trials involving the police to develop a grounded theory on the factors contributing to high levels of treatment integrity in Police Field Experiments. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, UK.

30.

Neyroud

(2018) Out of court disposals managed by the police: a review of the evidence. Commissioned by the National Police Chief’s Council of England and Wales. University of Cambridge. Available at: https://www.npcc.police.uk/Publication/NPCC%20Out%20of%20Court%20Disposals%20Evidence%20assessment%20FINAL%20June%202018.pdf (accessed 27 May 2021).

31.

Neyroud

Slothower

(2013) Operation Turning Point: Interim Report on a Randomised Trial in Birmingham. Cambridge: Institute of Criminology.

32.

Neyroud

Slothower

Sherman

, et al. (2015) Operation Turning Point (storyboard), College of Policing. Available at: https://whatworks.college.police.uk/Research/Research-Map/Documents/TP_Storyboard.pdf (accessed 20 February 2021).

33.

NHS (2015) Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) downloaded from. Available at: https://www.gmw.nhs.uk/download.cfm?doc=docm93jijm4n639.pdf&ver+1017 (accessed 16 October 2015).

34.

National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) (2017) Charging And Out of Court Disposals: A National Strategy. NPCC (accessed 20 February 2019).

35.

Office of National Statistics (ONS) (2017) Crime Severity Score data tool. ONS.gov.uk. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/datasets/crimeseverityscoredatatool (accessed 05 January 2018).

36.

Oyserman

Markus

(1990) Possible selves and delinquency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(1): 112.

37.

Parker

Grasmick

(1979) Linking actual and perceived certainty of punishment: an exploratory study of an untested proposition in deterrence theory. Criminology 17(3): 366–379.

38.

Paternoster

(1987) The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: a review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly 4(2): 173–217.

39.

Punch

(1986) The Politics and Ethics of Fieldwork. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

40.

Rex

(1999) Desistance from offending: experiences of probation. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 38(4): 366–383.

41.

Routledge

(2015) A Protocol and Experimental Trial: The Checkpoint Desistance Programme in Durham. Cambridge: Institute of Criminology.

42.

Sadlier

(2010) Evaluation of the Impact of the HM Prison Service Enhanced Thinking Skills Programme on Reoffending. Outcomes of the Surveying Prisoner Crime Reduction (SPCR) Sample. Ministry of Justice Research Series 19/10. Available at: https://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/research-and-analysis/moj-research/eval-enhanced-thinking-skills-prog.pdf (accessed 27 May 2021).

43.

Sampson

Laub

(1997) A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In: Thornberry

(ed.) Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 133–163.

44.

Sherman

(2011) Offender desistance policing (ODP): less prison and more evidence in rehabilitating offenders. In: Bliesener

Beelmann

Stemmler

(eds) Antisocial Behavior and Crime: Contributions of Developmental and Evaluation research to Prevention and Intervention. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe Publishing, pp. 199–218.

45.

Sherman

Neyroud

(2012) Offender-Desistance Policing and the Sword of Damocles. London: Civitas.

46.

Sherman

Neyroud

(2016) The Cambridge crime harm index: measuring total harm from crime based on sentencing guidelines. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 10(3): 171–183.

47.

Torgerson

(2008) Designing Randomised Trials in Health, Education and Social Services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

48.

Trotter

(1996) The impact of different supervision practices in community corrections: cause for optimism. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 29(1): 1–19.

49.

Trotter

(2000) Social work education, pro-social orientation and effective probation practice. Probation Journal 47: 256–261.

50.

Urwin

(2016) Cambridge CRIM-PORT. Retrieved from Algorithmic forecasting of offender dangerousness for police custody officers: an assessment of accuracy for the Durham Constabulary Model. Available at: http://www.crim.cam.ac.uk/alumni/theses/Sheena%20Urwin%20Thesis%2012-12-2016.pdf (accessed 5 January 2018).

51.

Weir

Routledge

Kilili

(2019) Checkpoint: an innovative programme to navigate people away from the cycle of reoffending: implementation phase evaluation. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 15(1): 508–527. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paz015 (accessed March 2021).

52.

Williams

Hawkins

(1986) Perceptual research on general deterrence: a critical review. Law and Society Review 20: 545–572.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.18 MB

Checkpoint: An innovative Programme to navigate people away from the cycle of reoffending – A randomised control trial evaluation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material