Community police academies (CPA) are used by police agencies to educate the public on practices and expand community involvement. Using pre-test, post-test, and follow-up survey data, the current study examines the lasting effects of attending a CPA on citizen knowledge, perceptions, and concerns. Results indicate that participants were more knowledgeable about police practices, perceived officers as more honest and accountable, and expressed lower concerns about use of force and misconduct immediately following participation. Follow-up results indicated that, while knowledge was retained, the improvements to perceptions of honesty and accountability were reduced and concerns about misconduct had increased 6 months later.
BectonJBMeadowsLTearsR, et al. (2005) Can citizen police academies influence citizens’ beliefs and perceptions. Public Management87(4): 20–23.
2.
BellRLClevelandSEHansonPG, et al. (1969) Small group dialogue and discussion: an approach to police-community relationships. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science. 60(2): 242–246.
BreenMEJohnsonBR (2007) Citizen police academies: an analysis of enhanced police-community relations among citizen attendees. The Police Journal80(3): 246–266.
BrewsterJStoloffMSandersN (2005) Effectiveness of citizen police academies in changing the attitudes, beliefs, and behavior of citizen participants. American Journal of Criminal Justice30(1): 21–34.
7.
BuchnerBBobbMRootO, et al. (2008) Evaluation of a Pilot Community Policing Program: The Pasadena Police-Community Mediation and Dialog Program (COPS Evaluation Brief No. 2). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
8.
CohnEG (1996) The citizen police academy: a recipe for improving police-community relations. Journal of Criminal Justice24(3): 265–271.
9.
DesmondMPapachristosAVKirkDS (2016) Police violence and citizen crime reporting in the black community. American Sociological Review81(5): 857–876.
10.
ElliottIThomasSDMOgloffJRP (2011) Procedural justice in contacts with the police: testing a relational model of authority in a mixed methods study. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law17(4): 592–610.
11.
KempRL (2018) Police-community relations and services are changing in a positive way in cities throughout America. National Civic Review107: 49–51.
12.
LaiYLZhaoJS (2010) The impact of race/ethnicity, neighborhood context, and police/citizen interaction on residents’ attitudes toward the police. Journal of Criminal Justice38(4): 685–692.
13.
LeeTL (2016) Tennessee citizen police academies: program and participant characteristics. American Journal of Criminal Justice41(2): 236–254.
14.
LipsittPDSteinbrunerM (1969) An experiment in police-community relations: a small group approach. Community Mental Health Journal5(2): 172–179.
McCandlessS (2018) Improving community relations: how police strategies to improve accountability for social equity affect citizen perceptions. Public Integrity20(4): 370–385.
MurphyKTylerTR (2017) Experimenting with procedural justice policing. Journal of Experimental Criminology13(3): 287–292.
19.
NixJWolfeSE (2017) The impact of negative publicity on police self-legitimacy. Justice Quarterly34(1): 84–108.
20.
PerezNMNguyenTVogelBL (2020a) Community police academies: assessing the effect of education on public perceptions of police. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice, and Principles1–16.
21.
PerezNMNguyenTVogelBL (2020b) Community-police dialogues: evaluating the effects on adult, youth, and police participants. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice.
22.
PopeJJonesTCookS, et al. (2007) Citizen’s police academies: beliefs and perceptions regarding the program. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice3(1): 42–53.
23.
RosenbaumDPLawrenceDS (2017) Teaching procedural justice and communication skills during police–community encounters: results of a randomized control trial with police recruits. Journal of Experimental Criminology13(2): 292–319.
SkoganWGHartnettSM (1999) Community Policing, Chicago Style. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
SunshineJTylerTR (2003) The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review37: 513–548.
27.
TrojanowiczRTBucquerouxB (1990) Community Policing: A Contemporary Perspective. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company.
28.
TylerTR (2004) Enhancing police legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science593(1): 84–99.
29.
TylerTR (2008) Psychology and institutional design. Review of Law & Economics4(3): 801–887.
30.
TylerTRJacksonJ (2013) Future challenges in the study of legitimacy and criminal justice. In: TankebeJLieblingA (eds) Legitimacy and Criminal Justice. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 83–104.
31.
U.S. Census Bureau (2016) American Community Survey 1-year estimatesAvailable at: https://censusreporter.org (accessed 12 February 2021).
32.
WahlRWhiteSK (2017) Deliberation, accountability, and legitimacy: a case study of police-community forums. Polity49(4): 489–517.
33.
WeitzerRTuchSASkoganWG (2008) Police–community relations in a majority-black city. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency45(4): 398–428.
