Despite law enforcement’s best efforts to use social media as a means of community policing, some engagement tactics may lead citizens to disclose personally identifiable information (PII). We coded 200 tweets with the popular #9PMRoutine that tagged @PascoSheriff (Florida) for participant PII. We found numerous postings of adults’ and children’s PII that are problematic including pictures, health information and security-related comments about their routines or vacations. Implications for law enforcement to protect their communities are discussed as well as opportunities to continue to cultivate their online relationships in a more secure forum. We also provide future research directions.
AielloMF (2018) Policing through social networking: testing the linkage between digital and physical police practices. The Police Journal91(1): 89–101.
BrainardLEdlinsM (2015) Top 10 US municipal police departments and their social media usage. The American Review of Public Administration45(6): 728–745.
4.
BrainardLA (2016) Fostering engagement through social media? The case of the Washington, DC, Metropolitan Police Department. In: ZavattaroSMBryerTA (eds) Social Media for Government: Theory and Practice, 1st ed. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 117–134.
5.
ChaninJEspinosaS (2016) Examining the determinants of police department transparency: the view of police executives. Criminal Justice Policy Review27(5): 498–519.
Federal Trade Commission (2000) Final report of the Federal Trade Commission Advisory Committee on Online Access and Security. Available at: http://www.ftc.gov/acoas/papers/finalreport.htm (accessed December 2020).
9.
Federal Trade Commission (2013) Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule; Final Rule. Federal Register78(12): 16 CFR Part 312. Available at: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/2012-31341.pdf (accessed December 2020).
FoxAKHoyMG (2019) Smart devices, smart decisions? Implications of parents’ sharenting for children’s online privacy: an investigation of mothers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing38(4): 403–413.
HoyMGPhelpsJ (2003) Consumer privacy and security protection on church web sites: reasons for concern. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing22(1): 58–70.
17.
HoyMGPhelpsJ (2009) Online privacy and security practices of the 100 largest US nonprofit organizations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing14(1): 71–82.
18.
HuangYWuQ (2018) Understanding interactions between municipal police departments and the public on Twitter. In International conference on information, 25–28 March, pp. 37–46. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
19.
HuangYWuQHouY (2017) Examining Twitter mentions between police agencies and public users through the lens of stakeholder theory. In Proceedings of the 18th annual international conference on Digital Government Research, Staten Island, NY, USA, June 2017, pp. 30–38. ACM Digital Library.
MeijerAThaensM (2013) Social media strategies: understanding the differences between North American police departments. Government Information Quarterly30(4): 343–350.
26.
QuinnAGroveL (2018) ‘The whole window just shatters into a million pieces and it doesn’t make any sound’: an examination of ‘affordance’ and situational cues for theft from a motor vehicle. Security Journal31(4): 841–858.
27.
SchneiderCJ (2017) Body worn cameras and police image work: news media coverage of the rialto police department’s body worn camera experiment. Crime, Media, Culture14(3): 449–466.
28.
WalshJPO’ConnorC (2019) Social media and policing: a review of recent research. Sociology Compass13(1): e12648.
29.
WilliamsCBFedorowiczJKavanaughA, et al. (2018) Leveraging social media to achieve a community policing agenda. Government Information Quarterly35(2): 210–222.
30.
WimmerRDDominickJR (1997) Mass Media Research: An Introduction. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
31.
YinZFabbriDRosenbloomST, et al. (2015) A scalable framework to detect personal health mentions on Twitter. Journal of Medical Internet Research17(6): e138.
32.
ZawiszaTGarzaR (2017) Using an eye tracking device to assess vulnerabilities to burglary. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology32(3): 203–213.
