Researchers are starting to explore predictive models for departmental usage of opportunities to self-represent online. This is the first study to independently address police social networking in the US across a variety of social media platforms. Using the sampling frame of the 558 ‘self-representing’ municipal police department respondents in the 2007 Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) data, I collected information concerning whether departments maintained active accounts on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube in 2014. The LEMAS data provides key independent variables concerning each department’s community-oriented policing commitment and technological sophistication. Ultimately, these organisational features are not predictive of departmental use of any of the three social networking sites.
AielloMF (2014) Policing the masculine frontier: Cultural criminological analysis of the gendered performance of policing. Crime, Media, Culture10(1): 59–79.
2.
BartheELateanoT (2006) The state of police department web sites. Police Chief73(5): 68–74.
3.
BayerlPSStoynovL (2014) Revenge by photoshop: Memefying police acts in the public dialogue about injustice. New Media and Society18(6): 1006–1026.
4.
BrainardLEdlinsM (2014) Top 10 US municipal police departments and their social media usage. The American Review of Public Administration45(6): 728–745.
5.
CordnerGW (1999) Elements of community policing. In: GainesLKCordnerGW (eds) Policing Perspectives: An Anthology. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company, 137–149.
6.
CrumpJ (2011) What are the police doing on Twitter? Social media, the police and the public. Policy and Internet3(4): 1–27.
7.
DykehouseSGSiglerRT (2000) Use of the World Wide Web, hyperlinks and managing the news by criminal justice agencies. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management23(3): 318–338.
GermannAC (1969) Community policing: An assessment. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science60(1): 89–96.
11.
GiacomelloG (2004) Bangs for the buck: A cost-benefit analysis of cyberterrorism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism27(5): 387–408.
12.
IBM Corp (2013) IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 [computer software]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
13.
KatyalSK (2003) The new surveillance. Case Western Reserve Law Review54(2): 297–385.
14.
KellyAFinlaysonA (2015) Can Facebook save Neighborhood Watch?Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles88(1): 65–77.
15.
LiebermanJDKoetzleDSakiyamaM (2013) Police departments’ use of Facebook: Patterns and policy issues. Police Quarterly16(4): 438–462.
16.
LuckenbillDMillerK (2008) Policing intellectual property piracy: A study in corporate control of crime. Journal of Crime and Justice31(2): 27–64.
17.
MastrofskiSDWillisJJKochelTR (2007) The challenges of implementing community policing in the United States. Policing1(2): 223–234.
18.
O’ConnorCD (2015) The police on Twitter: Image management, community building, and implications for policing in Canada. Policing and Society. Published online ahead of print. 1–14.
19.
PanagiotopoulosPBigdeliAZSamsS (2012) ‘5 days in August’: How London local authorities used Twitter during the 2011 riots. Electronic Government7443: 102–113.
20.
ProcterRCrumpJKarstedtSVossACantijochM (2013) Reading the riots: What were the police doing on Twitter?Policing and Society23(4): 413–436.
21.
ReisigMD (2011) Community and problem-oriented policing. In: TonryM (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Crime and Criminal Justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 538–569
22.
RosenbaumDPGrazianoLMStephensCDSchuckAM (2011) Understanding community policing and legitimacy-seeking behavior in virtual reality: A national study of municipal police websites. Police Quarterly14(1): 25–47.
23.
RuddellRJonesN (2013) Social media and policing: Matching the message to the audience. Safer Communities12(2): 64–70.
24.
SchneiderCJ (2016) Police presentational strategies on Twitter in Canada. Policing and Society26(2): 129–147.
25.
SoperD (2015) Statistics calculators, Version 3.0 [computer software].
26.
TullyEJMcKeeS (2000) The present and future use of the Internet by law enforcement: Part one. NEIA Research Projects On-Line. Available at: www.neiassociates.org/internet-and-law-enforcement/(accessed 12 January 2016).
US Bureau of Justice Statistics (2007) Law enforcement management and administrative statistics (LEMAS), 2007. Available at: www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/31161(accessed 12 January 2016).
US Bureau of Justice Statistics (2013) Law enforcement management and administrative statistics (LEMAS), 2013. Available at: www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/36164(accessed 12 January 2016).
31.
WeimannG (2005) Cyberterrorism: The sum of all fears?Studies in Conflict and Terrorism28(2): 129–149.
32.
WhitakerGP (1982) What is patrol work?Police Studies: The International Review of Police Development4(4): 13–22.
