Extra-curricular programmes that unite police officers and youth (hereafter: ‘police-youth programmes’) have long been recommended to ameliorate the often-strained relationship between these groups. Baltimore’s history of police-youth programming includes initiating and discontinuing a variety of programmes. Researchers conducted in-depth interviews and focus group discussions among diverse stakeholders to identify barriers to sustaining police-youth programmes. Stakeholders described lack of political will, conflicting policing philosophies, and negative police-community dynamics. Participants were optimistic about the potential impact of quality programming, despite these barriers. Police-youth programmes have the capacity to improve police-youth relationships in Baltimore. Strategies to ensure sustainability and increase impact are discussed.
AlexanderM (2012) The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.
2.
AllenTParkerM (2013) Police officers and their perceived relationship with urban communities: Does living in the community influence police decisions?Social Development Issues35(3): 82–95.
3.
AndersonSASabatelliRMTrachtenbergJ (2007) Community police and youth programs as a context for positive youth development. Police Quarterly10(1): 23–40.
BassS (2001), Policing space, policing race: Social control imperatives and police discretionary decisions. Social Justice28(1): 156–76.
6.
BeckettKSassonT (2004) The Politics of Injustice: Crime and Punishment in America. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
BerkowitzE (1997) Baltimore’s public schools in a time of transition. Maryland Historical Magazine92(4): 419–529.
8.
BlasiGJostJT (2006) System justification theory and research: Implications for law, legal advocacy, and social justice. California Law Review94(4): 1119–1168.
9.
BorreroM (2001) The widening mistrust between youth and police. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services82(4): 399–408.
10.
BroaddusETScottKEGonsalvesLMParrishCRhodesELDonovanSEWinchPJ (2013) Building connections between officers and Baltimore city youth: Key components of a police-youth teambuilding program. Journal of Juvenile Justice3(1): 48–62.
11.
BrunsonRKMillerJ (2006) Young black men and urban policing in the United States. British Journal of Criminology46(4): 613–640.
12.
BrunsonRKWeitzerR (2009) Police relations with black and white youths in different urban neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review (44)6: 858–885.
13.
CashmoreEMcLaughlinE (2013) Out of Order: Policing Black People. New York: Routledge.
14.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE.
15.
CollinsR (2007) Strolling while poor: How broken-windows policing created a new crime in Baltimore. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy14(3): 254–266
16.
DocoboJM (2005) Community policing as the primary prevention strategy for homeland security at the local law enforcement level. Homeland Security Affairs1(4). Available at: https://www.hsaj.org/articles/183(accessed 8 February 2017).
17.
EithCDuroseM (2011) Contacts Between Police and the Public, 2008. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
18.
ErezE (1984) Self-defined ‘desert’ and citizens’ assessment of the police. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology75(4): 1276–1299.
19.
FaganJGellerADaviesGWestV (2009) Street stops and broken windows revisited: The demography and logic of proactive policing in a safe and changing city. In RiceSWhiteMD (eds) Race, Ethnicity, And Policing: New And Essential Readings (09-203). New York: New York University Press, 309–348.
FineMFreudenbergNPayneYPerkinsTSmithKWanzerK (2003) ‘Anything can happen with police around’: Urban youth evaluate strategies of surveillance in public places. Journal of Social Issues59(1): 141–158.
24.
FordJK (2007) Building capability throughout a change effort: leading the transformation of a police agency to community policing. American Journal of Community Psychology39(3–4): 321–334.
25.
GiacomazziAThurmanQC (1994) Cops and kids revisited: A second-year assessment of a community policing and delinquency prevention innovation. Police Studies17(4): 1–20.
26.
GlensorRWPeakK (1996) Implementing change: Community-oriented policing and problem solving. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin65(7): 14–21.
27.
GuestGBunceAJohnsonL (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods18(1): 59–82.
28.
HaarrRN (2001) The making of a community policing officer: The impact of basic training and occupational socialization on police recruits. Police Quarterly4(4): 402–433.
29.
HarcourtBE (1998) Reflecting on the subject: A critique of the social influence conception of deterrence, the broken windows theory, and order-maintenance policing New York style. Michigan Law Review97(2) 291–389.
30.
HarcourtBELudwigJ (2006) Broken windows: New evidence from New York City and a five-city social experiment. The University of Chicago Law Review73(1) 271–320.
HindsL (2009) Youth, police legitimacy and informal contact. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology24(1): 10–21.
33.
HowellB (2009) Broken lives from broken windows: The hidden costs of aggressive order-maintenance policing. New York University Review of Law and Social Change33: 271.
34.
HurstYGFrankJLee BrowningS (2000) The attitudes of juveniles toward the police: A comparison of black and white youth. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management23(1): 37–53.
35.
JostJTBanajiMR (1994) The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology33(1): 1–27.
36.
JostJTBanajiMRNosekBA (2004) A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology25(6): 881–919.
37.
JostJTGlaserJKruglanskiAWSullowayFJ (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin129(3): 339–375.
38.
KayACFriesenJ (2011) On social stability and social change understanding when system justification does and does not occur. Current Directions in Psychological Science20(6): 360–364.
39.
KayACGaucherDPeachJMLaurinKFriesenJZannaMPSpencerSJ (2009) The power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology97(3): 421–434.
40.
KralsteinD (2007) Community Justice Model: An Evaluation of the Baltimore Community Justice Initiative. Baltimore: Center for Court Innovation, University of Maryland, Baltimore. Available at:www.courtinnovation.org/sites/default/files/Baltimore_Eval.pdf(accessed 8 February 2017).
41.
KubrinCEWeitzerR (2003) Retaliatory homicide: Concentrated disadvantage and neighborhood culture. Social Problems50(2): 157–180.
42.
LaurinKShepherdSKayAC (2010) Restricted emigration, system inescapability, and the defense of the status quo: System justifying consequences of restricted exit opportunities. Psychological Science21(8): 1075–1082.
McCluskeyJDMastrofskiSDParksRB (1999) To acquiesce or rebel: Predicting citizen compliance with police requests. Police Quarterly2(4): 389–416.
47.
NewmanSAFoxJAFlynnEAChristesonW (2000) America’s after-school choice: The prime time for juvenile crime, or youth enrichment and achievement. Washington, DC: A Report from Fight Crime: Invest in Kids. Available at: www.jfox.neu.edu/Documents/afterschool2000.pdf(accessed 8 February 2017).
48.
PattonM (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
PiqueroA (2008) Disproportionate Minority Contact. The Future of Children18(2): 59–79.
51.
Presman DRChapmanRosenL (2002) Creative Partnerships: Supporting Youth, Building Communities. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
52.
RothJARyanJF (2000) The COPS Program after 4 Years: National Evaluation. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
53.
RuryJLHillS (2013) An end of innocence: African-American high school protest in the 1960s and 1970s. History of Education42(4): 486–508.
54.
RutjensBTvan HarreveldFvan der PligtJ (2010) Yes we can: Belief in progress as compensatory control. Social Psychological and Personality Science1(3): 246–252.
55.
SaldañaJ (2009) Writing analytic memos. In The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: SAGE Publications, 41–57.
56.
SampsonRJBartuschDJ (1998) Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law and Society Review777–804.
57.
ShepherdSKayACLandauMJKeeferLA (2011) Evidence for the specificity of control motivations in worldview defense: Distinguishing compensatory control from uncertainty management and terror management processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology47(5): 949–958.
58.
SmithBWHolmesMD (2003) Community accountability, minority threat, and police brutality: An examination of civil rights criminal complaints. Criminology41(4): 1035–1064.
59.
StoutlandSE (2001) The multiple dimensions of trust in resident/police relations in Boston. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency38(3): 226–256.
60.
SubhasNChandraA (2004) Baltimore City Police Athletic League Assessment Study. Baltimore: Center for Adolescent Health-Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
61.
TerrillWReisigMD (2003). Neighborhood context and police use of force. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency40(3): 291–321.
62.
ThompsonHA (2010) Why mass incarceration matters: Rethinking crisis, decline, and transformation in postwar American history. The Journal of American History97(3): 703–734.
63.
ThurmanQCGiacomazziABogenP (1993) Research note: Cops, kids, and community policing: An assessment of a community policing demonstration project. Crime and Delinquency39(4): 554–564.
64.
TrettienB (2006) Order-maintenance policing in Baltimore: The failure of ‘broken windows’ as a police strategy. Recipient of the 2006 Abell Award in Urban Policy. Available at: www.abell.org/sites/default/files/files/2006%20Trettien.pdf(accessed 8 February 2017).
65.
TylerTR (2004) Enhancing police legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science593(1): 84–99.
66.
TylerTRJacksonJMentovichA (2015) The consequences of being an object of suspicion: Potential pitfalls of proactive police contact. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (12)4, 602–636.
67.
United States Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (2003a) Community Policing Explained: A Guide for Local Governments. Available at:www.cops.usdoj.gov/pdf/vets-to-cops/cp_explained.pdf(accessed 8 February 2017).
United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division (2016) Investigation of the Baltimore City Police Department. Available at: www.justice.gov/opa/file/883366/download(accessed 8 February 2017).
70.
Van der ToornJJostJT (2014) Twenty years of system justification theory: Introduction to the special issue on ‘Ideology and system justification processes’. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations17(4): 143–419.
71.
WeitzerRTuchSA (2005) Racially biased policing: Determinants of citizen perceptions. Social Forces83(3): 1009–1030.
72.
WilliamsEJ (2003) Structuring in community policing: Institutionalizing innovative change. Police Practice and Research4(2): 119–129.
