Rural schools, especially smaller ones, offer enormous opportunities for teachers to get to know their students and to cultivate their academic talents. However, students with potential in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) face specific obstacles to having their talents fully realized in rural schools. Joni Lakin, Tamra Stambaugh, Lori Ihrig, Duhita Mahatmya, and Susan G. Assouline describe the STEM Excellence and Leadership project from the University of Iowa, which seeks to equip rural teachers in grades 5-8 with the skills and knowledge to recognize and grow STEM talent in rural areas. Examples of success and lessons learned are shared.
ACT (2017). STEM education in the U.S.: Where we are and what we can do. Author.
2.
ArdiesJ.De MaeyerS.GijbelsD. (2015). A longitudinal study on boys’ and girls’ career aspirations and interest in technology. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33 (3), 366–386.
3.
AssoulineS.G.IhrigL.M.MahatmyaD. (2017). Closing the excellence gap: Investigation of an expanded talent search model for student selection into an extracurricular STEM program in rural middle schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61 (3), 250–261.
4.
AssoulineS.G.MahatmyaD.IhrigL.LaneE. (2020, April). High-achieving rural middle-school students’ academic self-efficacy and attributions in relationship to gender. High Ability Studies, 1–27.
5.
BishopR.S. (1990). Mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors. Perspectives: Choosing and using books for the classroom, 6 (3).
6.
BohanonM. (2018, August16). Innovative programs expose rural students to opportunities in STEM. Insight Into Diversity.
7.
DuschlR.A.SchweingruberH.A.ShouseA.W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. National Academies Press.
8.
GeorgeR. (2000). Measuring change in students’ attitudes toward science over time: An application of latent variable growth modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9 (3), 213–225.
9.
GrangerE.M.BevisT.H.SakaY.SoutherlandS.A. (2009, April) Learning about space science: Comparing the efficacy of reform-based teaching with a traditional/verifications approach. Paper presented to the 2009 American Educational Research Association conference, San Diego, CA.
10.
GrossB.OpalkaA. (2020). Too many schools leave learning to chance during the pandemic. Center on Reinventing Public Education.
11.
HacheyA.C. (2020). Success for all: Fostering early childhood STEM identity. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13 (1).
12.
HarrisR.S.HodgesC.B. (2018). STEM education in rural schools: Implications of untapped potential. National Youth-At-Risk Journal, 3 (1).
13.
IhrigL.M.LaneE.MahatmyaD.AssoulineS.G. (2018). STEM Excellence and Leadership program: Increasing the level of STEM challenge and engagement for high-achieving students in economically disadvantaged rural communities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41 (1), 24–42.
14.
IrvinM.J.HannumW.H.FarmerT.W.de la VarreC.KeaneJ. (2009). Supporting online learning for advanced placement students in small rural schools: Conceptual foundations and intervention components of the facilitator preparation program. The Rural Educator, 31 (1), 29–37.
15.
KittlesonT.MorganJ.T. (2012). Schools in balance: Comparing Iowa physics teachers and teaching in large and small schools. Iowa Science Teachers Journal, 39 (1), 8–12.
16.
LapanR.T.TuckerB.KimS.K.KosciulekJ.F. (2003). Preparing rural adolescents for post‐high school transitions. Journal of Counseling & Development, 81 (3), 329–342.
17.
LavalleyM. (2018). Out of the loop: Rural schools are largely left out of research and policy discussions, exacerbating poverty, inequity, and isolation. Center for Public Education.
18.
LawrenceB.K. (2009). Rural gifted education: A comprehensive literature review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32 (4), 461–494.
19.
Lawrence Hall of Science. (2009). Great explorations in math and science (GEMS). Author.
20.
LynnR.GlynnJ. (2019). Small town, big talent: Identifying and supporting academically promising students in rural areas. Jack Kent Cooke Foundation.
21.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2017, December). Table 4. Selected statistics from the public elementary/secondary school universe; School year 2015-16. U.S. Department of Education.
22.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2001). Navigation series middle school bundle 6-8. Author.
23.
National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. National Academies Press.
24.
National Research Council. (2015). Identifying and supporting productive STEM programs in out-of-school settings. National Academies Press.
25.
National Rural Education Association (2016). The voice of rural schools and communities. Author.
26.
OsborneJ.SimonS.CollinsS. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (9), 1049–1079.
27.
PetersonB.BornemannG.LydonC.WestK. (2015). Rural students in Washington State: STEM as a strategy for building rigor, postsecondary aspirations, and relevant career opportunities. Peabody Journal of Education, 90 (2), 280–293.
28.
Place-based Education Evaluation Collaborative. (2010). The benefits of place-based education: A report from the Place-based Education Evaluation Collaborative (2nd ed.). Author.
29.
RasheedM. (2020). Context and content in rural gifted education: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31 (1), 61–84.
30.
SawG.K.AggerC.A. (2021, June). STEM pathways of rural and small-town students: Opportunities to learn, aspirations, preparation, and college enrollment. Educational Researcher.
31.
SewardK.GaesserA.H. (2018). Career decision-making with gifted rural students: Considerations for school counselors and teachers. Gifted Child Today, 41 (4), 217–225.
32.
StambaughT.WoodS.M. (2015). Serving gifted students in rural settings. Routledge.
33.
SubotnikR.F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF.C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12 (1), 3–54.
34.
TrustyJ. (2002). Effects of high school course‐taking and other variables on choice of science and mathematics college majors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 80 (4), 464–474.
35.
TenenbaumL.S.AndersonM.K.YourickD.L. (2014). An innovative near-peer mentoring model for undergraduate and secondary students: STEM focus. Innovative Higher Education, 39 (5), 375–385.
36.
VersyptJ.J.Ford VersyptA.N. (2013, June). Mapping rural students’ STEM involvement: Case studies of chemical engineering undergraduate enrollment in the states of Illinois and Kansas. Paper presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.
