Impacts of a residential STEM program on increasing interest in computer science careers for gifted female students

Abstract

This study explored factors impacting the decision for gifted females to pursue a career in computer science. The study used a phenomenological approach to delve into the experiences of ten gifted alumnae of The Gatton Academy of Mathematics and Science (Gatton), a residential STEM program, aiming to reveal nuanced insights into factors shaping their career development. Participants were selected based on their initial intentions to pursue careers other than CS before attending Gatton but changing to a CS focus afterward. Semi-structured interviews conducted via Zoom and coded using thematic analysis provided rich data on lived experiences and perspectives of participants. Findings shed light on the multifaceted factors influencing gifted women’s career intentions before attending Gatton, the transformative effects of the residential STEM program on their decisions to pursue CS careers, and the evolution of their perceptions of CS over time.

Keywords

Gifted education talent development computer science career decisions science,technology,engineering,and mathematics programs specialized schools

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achter

J. A.

Lubinski

(2005). Blending promise with passion: Best practices for counseling intellectually talented youth. In Brown

S. D.

Lent

R. W.

(Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 600–624). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Adams-Byers

Whitsell

S. S.

Moon

S. M.

(2004). Gifted students’ perceptions of the academic and social/emotional effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800102

Besnoy

K. D.

McDaniel

S. C.

(2016). Going up in dreams and esteem: Cross-age mentoring to promote leadership skills in high school–age gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 39(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217515613386

Boyd

Hemmings

Braggett

(2001). A career education program for gifted high school students: A case study. Australian Journal of Career Development, 10(2), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/103841620101000203

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cao

T. H.

Jung

J. Y.

Smith

(2021). The career intentions of gifted English as a foreign language high school students in Vietnam. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(3), 262–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986221991166

Chan

Yuen

(2023). Career decision-making of talented engineering graduates in Hong Kong. Gifted and Talented International, 38(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2671-9_6

Coleman

L. J.

(2005). Nurturing talent in high school: Life in the fast lane. Teachers College.

Emmett

J. D.

Minor

C. W.

(1993). Career decision-making factors in gifted young adults. The Career Development Quarterly, 41(4), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1993.tb00409.x

10.

Enersen

D. L.

(1993). Summer residential programs: Academics and beyond. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(4), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629303700406

11.

Ertl

Luttenberger

Paechter

(2017) The impact of gender stereotypes on the self-concept of female students in stem subjects with an under-representation of females. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 703. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00703

12.

Fiebig

J. N.

(2003). Gifted American and German early adolescent girls: Influences on career orientation and aspirations. High Ability Studies, 14(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813032000163898

13.

Fiebig

J. N.

Beauregard

(2011). Longitudinal change and maternal influence on occupational aspirations of gifted female American and German adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003400103

14.

Figg

Rogers

McCormick

Low

(2012). Differentiating low performance of the gifted learner: Achieving, underachieving, and selective consuming students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X11430000

15.

Gagné

(2021). Implementing the DMGT’s constructs of giftedness and talent: What, why, and how? In Smith

S. R.

(Ed.), Handbook of giftedness and talent development in the asia-pacific (pp. 71–99). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3041-4_3

16.

Gómez-Arízaga

M. P.

Navarro

Roa-Tampe

Conejeros-Solar

M. L.

Valdivia-Lefort

Martin

Bravo Rojas

(2023). Career choice in gifted students with interests in STEM. Gifted and Talented International, 38(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2023.2237556

17.

Greene

M. J.

(2003). Gifted adrift? Career counseling of the gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 25(2), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554201

18.

Greene

M. J.

(2006). Helping build lives: Career and life development of gifted and talented students. Professional School Counseling, 10(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.5330/PRSC.10.1.B55J504360M48424

19.

Hoyt

(2019). Interrater reliability and agreement. In Hancock

Stapleton

Mueller

(Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to Quantitative methods in the social sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.

20.

Jung

J. Y.

(2019). The career development of gifted students. In Athanasou

J. A.

Perera

H. N.

(Eds.), International handbook of career guidance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25153-6_15

21.

Jung

J. Y.

Young

(2019). The occupational/career decision-making processes of intellectually gifted adolescents from economically disadvantaged backgrounds: A mixed methods perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218804575

22.

Kang

(2022). Meta-analysis on the career development of gifted students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 32(3), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2022.32.3.431

23.

Kher-Durlabhji

Lacina-Gifford

L. J.

Carter

R. C.

Lalande

L. K.

(1997). A career in teaching: Comparing views of gifted and talented adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X9700900104

24.

Kollof

P. B.

(2003). State-supported residential high schools. In Colangelo

Davis

G. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 238–246). Allyn & Bacon.

25.

Landivar

L. C.

(2013). Disparities in STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin. American Community Survey Reports, ACS-24, U.S. Census Bureau.

26.

Lee

(2008). Residential schools and gifted students. College of William & Mary. (Publication No. 1539272213). Master thesis. https://doi.org/10.25774/W4-M105-N575

27.

Lee

S.-Y.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Makel

M. C.

Putallaz

(2015). Gifted students’ perceptions of an accelerated summer program and social support. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215599205

28.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

29.

Lopatto

(2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039

30.

Maree

(2016). Career construction counseling with a mid-career black man. The Career Development Quarterly, 64(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/CDQ.12038

31.

Maree

J. G.

(2019). Self- and career construction counseling for a gifted young woman in search of meaning and purpose. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 19(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10775-018-9377-2

32.

Marland

S. P.

(1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the congress of the United States by the U. S. Commissioner of education: Vol. 1. United States Congress.

33.

Martinez-Garcia

Vowels-Duce

Messmore

(2022). The impact of STEM based programs on girls and women. Proceedings of IMPRS 5(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.18060/26922

34.

Matthews

D. J.

Foster

J. F.

(2005). A dynamic scaffolding model of teacher development: The gifted education consultant as catalyst for change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(3), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900304

35.

Mayes

R. D.

Hines

E. M.

Bibbs

D. L.

Rodman

(2019). Counselors and psychologists mentoring gifted black males with disabilities to foster college and career readiness. Gifted Child Today, 42(3), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217519843150

36.

McChesney

J. E.

Behrend

T. S.

Glosenberg

(2022). Stereotypical descriptions of computer science career interests are not representative of many computer scientists. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 5990. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09522-0

37.

Mendez

L. M. R.

Crawford

K. M.

(2002). Gender-role stereotyping and career aspirations: A comparison of gifted early adolescent boys and girls. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13(3), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2002-375

38.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

(2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

39.

Miller

Cummings

(2009). Gifted and talented students’ career aspirations and influences: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 6(1), Article8. https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1667

40.

NAGC . (2018). What is giftedness? https://nagc.org/page/what-is-giftedness

41.

NAGC . (2019). Gifted programming standards. https://nagc.org/page/National-Standards-in-Gifted-and-Talented-Education

42.

Napier

R. D.

Jarvis

J. M.

Clark

Halsey

R. J.

(2024). Influences on career development for gifted adolescent girls in selective academic programs in Australia. Gifted Child Quarterly, 68(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862231201604

43.

Perrone

K. M.

Tschopp

M. K.

Snyder

E. R.

Boo

J. N.

Hyatt

(2010). A longitudinal examination of career expectations and outcomes of academically talented students 10 and 20 years post-high school graduation. Journal of Career Development, 36(4), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845309359347

44.

Persson

R. S.

(2009). Intellectually gifted individuals’ career choices and work satisfaction: A descriptive study. Gifted and Talented International, 24(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2009.11674857

45.

Roberts

J. L.

(2013). The Gatton Academy: A case study of a state residential high school with a focus on mathematics and science. Gifted Child Today, 36(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217513486649

46.

Roberts

J. L.

Alderdice

C. T.

(2015). State residential STEM schools: A model for accelerated learning. In Assouline

S. G.

Colangelo

VanTassel-Baska

Lupkowski-Shoplik

A. E.

(Eds.), A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses that hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. II, pp. 137–151). The Belin-Blank Center for Gifted and Talented Education.

47.

Sáinz

Fàbregues

Romano

M. J.

López

B.-S.

(2022). Interventions to increase young people’s interest in STEM. A scoping review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 954996. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954996

48.

Scott

Zou

Jacob

S. R.

Richardson

Warschauer

(2023). Comparing boys and girls attitudes toward computer science. Journal of Computer Science Integration, 6(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.26716/jcsi.2023.2.22.37

49.

Seward

Gaesser

A. H.

(2018). Career decision-making with gifted rural students: Considerations for school counselors and teachers. Gifted Child Today, 41(4), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217518786986

50.

Smith

C. K.

Wood

S. M.

(2018). Career counseling for the gifted and talented: A life span development approach. In Pfeiffer

S. I.

(Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 315–333). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_18

51.

Sternberg

R. J.

Jarvin

Grigorenko

E. L.

(2010). Explorations in giftedness. Cambridge University.

52.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056

53.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization . (2021). UNESCO science report 2021: The race against time for smarter development. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210058575

54.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics . (2023). Women in the labor force: A databook (1103). https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-databook/2022/home.htm

55.

Veldman-de Jonge

Jen

(2022). Choices gifted women made in education, personal life, and career: A qualitative study in The Netherlands. Gifted and Talented International, 37(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2022.2075293

56.

Vock

Köller

Nagy

(2013). Vocational interests of intellectually gifted and highly achieving young adults. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(Pt 2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02063.x

57.

Watters

J. J.

(2010). Career decision making among gifted students: The mediation of teachers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(3), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210369255

58.

Wright

(2022). The case for gifted education. The Thomas B. Fordham Institute. https://fordhaminstitute.org/national/commentary/case-gifted-education

59.

H. P.

Jen

(2021). The gender role and career self-efficacy of gifted girls in STEM areas. High Ability Studies, 32(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1705767