The COVID-19 global pandemic has required everyone to make sense of data about community spread, levels of risk, and vaccine efficacy. Yet research shows that students are underprepared in data literacy. Tanya LaMar and Jo Boaler argue that data science education provides an opportunity to address this problem while providing much needed updates to the current mathematics curriculum. The integration of data science can provide a more equitable mathematics pipeline than the calculus-focused pathway that has excluded most students from a future in mathematics. Through data science, students can learn to answer questions that are relevant to their lives and communities, to be critical consumers of the data that surround them every day, and to wield the power of data analysis.
BerryR.Q.IIILarsonM.R. (2019). The need to catalyze change in high school mathematics. Phi Delta Kappan, 100 (6), 39–44.
3.
BoalerJ. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Routledge.
4.
BoalerJ. (2015). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
5.
BoalerJ.CorderoM.DieckmannJ. (2019) Pursuing gender equity in mathematics competitions: A case of mathematical freedom. Mathematics Association of America MAA Focus, 39 (1), 18–20.
6.
BoalerJ.LevittS.D. (2019, October23). Opinion: Modern high school math should be about data science — not Algebra 2. The Los Angeles Times.
7.
BoalerJ.StaplesM. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers College Record, 110 (3), 608–645.
8.
BressoudD. (Ed.). (2017). The role of calculus in the transition from high school to college mathematics. Mathematical Association of America & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
9.
ChaS.H. (2015). Exploring disparities in taking high level math courses in public high schools. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 12 (1).
DaroP.AsturiasH. (2019). Branching out: Designing high school math pathways for equity. Just Equations.
12.
DiekmanA.B.BrownE.R.JohnstonA.M.ClarkE.K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21 (8), 1051–1057.
13.
DiekmanA.B.ClarkE.K.JohnstonA.M.BrownE.R.SteinbergM. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to STEM careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 902–918.
14.
EngelJ. (2017). Statistical literacy for active citizenship: A call for data science education. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16 (1), 44–49.
15.
EricksonT.WilkersonM.FinzerW.ReichsmanF. (2019). Data moves. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 12 (1).
16.
EvansC.D.DiekmanA.B. (2009). On motivated role selection: Gender beliefs, distant goals, and career interest. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33 (2), 235–249.
17.
FlemingP.J.WallaceJ.J. (1986). How not to lie with statistics: the correct way to summarize benchmark results. Communications of the ACM, 29 (3), 218–221.
18.
FriesL.SonJ.Y.GivvinK.B.StiglerJ.W. (2021). Practicing connections: A framework to guide instructional design for developing understanding in complex domains. Educational Psychology Review, 33 (2), 739–762.
19.
GouldR.MachadoS.OngC.JohnsonT.MolyneuxJ.NolenS.…ZanontianL. (2016, July). Teaching data science to secondary students: The mobilize introduction to data science curriculum. In EngelJ. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Roundtable Conference of the International Association of Statistics Education, Berlin.
20.
HuffD. (1993). How to lie with statistics. WW Norton & Company.
21.
JohnsonS. (2020, November9). University of California expands list of courses that meet math requirement for admission. EdSource.
22.
KahneJ.BowyerB. (2017). Educating for democracy in a partisan age: Confronting the challenges of motivated reasoning and misinformation. American Educational Research Journal, 54 (1), 3–34.
23.
KesarS. (2017). Closing the STEM gap: Why STEM classes and careers still lack girls and what we can do about it. Microsoft Philanthropies.
24.
KingG. (1986). How not to lie with statistics: Avoiding common mistakes in quantitative political science. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 666–687.
25.
KohY. (2020, November11). The movement to modernize math class. Wall Street Journal.
26.
KonoldC.HigginsT.RussellS.J.KhalilK. (2015). Data seen through different lenses. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88 (3), 305–325.
27.
Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area. (2013). Held back: Addressing misplacement of 9th grade students in Bay Area school math classes. Author.
NiederleM.VesterlundL. (2010). Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24 (2), 129–44.
30.
NobleS.U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
31.
O’NeilC. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Broadway Books.
32.
Program for International Student Assessment. (2020). PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
33.
RubinA. (2019). Learning to reason with data: How did we get here and what do we know?Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1–11.
34.
SpectorC. (2020, March3). Bringing math class into the data age. Research Stories. Stanford Graduate School of Education.
35.
WineburgS.McGrewS.BreakstoneJ.OrtegaT. (2016). Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning. Stanford Digital Repository.
36.
WolframC. (2020). The math(s) fix: An education blueprint for the AI age. Wolfram Media, Inc.
37.
ZuckerA.NoyceP.McCulloughA. (2020). JUST SAY NO! Teaching students to resist scientific misinformation. The Science Teacher, 87 (5), 24–29.
