In recent years, the federal government (under Republican and Democratic administrations alike) has encouraged the outsourcing of core parts of public education’s work, including testing and test preparation, teaching and tutoring, data collection, and human resources management. However, researchers have found little evidence to support policy makers’ assumption that privatization will lead schools to become more efficient and effective. If anything, evidence suggests that market-friendly education reforms have had negative effects on teaching and learning, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds.
AppleM.JungckS. (1990). You do not have to be a teacher to teach this unit: Teaching, technology and control in the classroom. Journal of Education, 291, 149–172.
2.
BurchP. (2009). Hidden markets: The new education privatization. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
3.
BurchP.MiglaniN. (2017). Technocentrism and social fields in the Indian edtech movement: Formation, reproduction and resistance. Journal of Education Policy, 33 (5), 590–616.
4.
BurchP.GoodA.HeinrichC. (2016). Improving access to quality and the effectiveness of digital tutoring in K–12 education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38 (1), 65–67.
5.
HeinrichC.BurchP.GoodA.AcostaR.ChengH.DillenderM.KirshbaumC.NisarH.StewartM. (2014) Improving the implementation and effectiveness of out of school time tutoring. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 3 (2), 471–494.
6.
McIntyreE. (2015, December4). The controversy behind ESSA’s Pay for Success initiative. Education Dive.
